Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/1275510424084021249

Remember those photos of Mr. Barak visiting Epstein’s New York apartment, either after he was arrested or after he died?

Looks like Israeli Prime minister Ehud Barak was busy beating and raping Virginia Guffrie.

More likely Epstein was an OP by the Mossad and Barak was checking in on his assets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/1275510424084021249

Remember those photos of Mr. Barak visiting Epstein’s New York apartment, either after he was arrested or after he died?

Looks like Israeli Prime minister Ehud Barak was busy beating and raping Virginia Guffrie.

Dershowitz is playing a political game. Barak did business with Epstein and was probably involved. He's on that particular list, which is entirely democrats, because Barak is in opposition to Netanyahu.

Remember that Dersh is on the list himself and was the guy digging up dirt on Guiffre and the other victims.

I think Dershowitz is worst of the worst in terms of character, and that as a Zionist who has decided he’s the worlds most hated Martha’s Vineyard resident, but nothing about that pleading is really a “political game.” Dershowitz is himself conservative (at best a contrarian civil libertarian and the nightmare of a “too smart” lawyer, who physically and legally in terms of maneuvers abused his first time til she killed herself over custody issues.) but so is Prince Andrew on that list, and we know to a certainty he did what he was accused of (photo, reputed payment of 12 million pounds).

I believe every name listed accurately lists a man who raped Giuffre or participated in an orgy with underage and of age abused and trafficked women. So yes - I believe Senators Mitchell and Richardson are in there along with Clinton, and Trump, and Andrew, and Ehud Barak.

This story is an important story to me. It provides a sense of the kind of abuse many of us don’t see. We’re in the understory, and we are all susceptible to biases where we think “our people” can’t do heinously abusive things. I’m not that deluded anymore. Michelle Goldberg (liberal oped NYT columnists) wrote back in 2016 a single column that perhaps there was something to the myriad Bill Clinton assault allegations, and that maybe we who voted for him (like me) should stop laughing at phrases like “bimbo eruption” and start thinking big about why exactly so many “opposite” people are tainted by this.

I don’t know any democrat in real life who would have the slightest hesitation about dem names being published. Of course there are dems implicated-throw the book at them!

Would it be very discouraging to find that a dem that shocked me was on the list (meaning not Clinton, etc)-yes! But of course they should still be named.

I feel like that’s a key difference between democrats and republicans at the moment. (For example, I don’t know anyone who wasn’t completely disgusted by the Hunter Biden pardon.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Giuffere's book had already taken down a British Prince and a British aristocrat. It will also take down an American president. Judging by how quickly the two in England were downed, I don't give trump a lot of time before he toppled.

Read "Epstein: Dirty Secrets Emerge From a Painful Book — and the Powerful Squirm" on SmartNews: https://l.smartnews.com/p-6qyo76py/lKKmlz

Link doesn't work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/1275510424084021249

Remember those photos of Mr. Barak visiting Epstein’s New York apartment, either after he was arrested or after he died?

Looks like Israeli Prime minister Ehud Barak was busy beating and raping Virginia Guffrie.

Dershowitz is playing a political game. Barak did business with Epstein and was probably involved. He's on that particular list, which is entirely democrats, because Barak is in opposition to Netanyahu.

Remember that Dersh is on the list himself and was the guy digging up dirt on Guiffre and the other victims.

I think Dershowitz is worst of the worst in terms of character, and that as a Zionist who has decided he’s the worlds most hated Martha’s Vineyard resident, but nothing about that pleading is really a “political game.” Dershowitz is himself conservative (at best a contrarian civil libertarian and the nightmare of a “too smart” lawyer, who physically and legally in terms of maneuvers abused his first time til she killed herself over custody issues.) but so is Prince Andrew on that list, and we know to a certainty he did what he was accused of (photo, reputed payment of 12 million pounds).

I believe every name listed accurately lists a man who raped Giuffre or participated in an orgy with underage and of age abused and trafficked women. So yes - I believe Senators Mitchell and Richardson are in there along with Clinton, and Trump, and Andrew, and Ehud Barak.

This story is an important story to me. It provides a sense of the kind of abuse many of us don’t see. We’re in the understory, and we are all susceptible to biases where we think “our people” can’t do heinously abusive things. I’m not that deluded anymore. Michelle Goldberg (liberal oped NYT columnists) wrote back in 2016 a single column that perhaps there was something to the myriad Bill Clinton assault allegations, and that maybe we who voted for him (like me) should stop laughing at phrases like “bimbo eruption” and start thinking big about why exactly so many “opposite” people are tainted by this.

I don’t know any democrat in real life who would have the slightest hesitation about dem names being published. Of course there are dems implicated-throw the book at them!

Would it be very discouraging to find that a dem that shocked me was on the list (meaning not Clinton, etc)-yes! But of course they should still be named.

I feel like that’s a key difference between democrats and republicans at the moment. (For example, I don’t know anyone who wasn’t completely disgusted by the Hunter Biden pardon.)

Speaking of Hunter could it be that he is in the files and that’s why the Biden administration didn’t release them? I know there were other reasons but this just crossed my mind. Hunter seemed like Biden’s Achilles heel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/1275510424084021249

Remember those photos of Mr. Barak visiting Epstein’s New York apartment, either after he was arrested or after he died?

Looks like Israeli Prime minister Ehud Barak was busy beating and raping Virginia Guffrie.

Dershowitz is playing a political game. Barak did business with Epstein and was probably involved. He's on that particular list, which is entirely democrats, because Barak is in opposition to Netanyahu.

Remember that Dersh is on the list himself and was the guy digging up dirt on Guiffre and the other victims.

I think Dershowitz is worst of the worst in terms of character, and that as a Zionist who has decided he’s the worlds most hated Martha’s Vineyard resident, but nothing about that pleading is really a “political game.” Dershowitz is himself conservative (at best a contrarian civil libertarian and the nightmare of a “too smart” lawyer, who physically and legally in terms of maneuvers abused his first time til she killed herself over custody issues.) but so is Prince Andrew on that list, and we know to a certainty he did what he was accused of (photo, reputed payment of 12 million pounds).

I believe every name listed accurately lists a man who raped Giuffre or participated in an orgy with underage and of age abused and trafficked women. So yes - I believe Senators Mitchell and Richardson are in there along with Clinton, and Trump, and Andrew, and Ehud Barak.

This story is an important story to me. It provides a sense of the kind of abuse many of us don’t see. We’re in the understory, and we are all susceptible to biases where we think “our people” can’t do heinously abusive things. I’m not that deluded anymore. Michelle Goldberg (liberal oped NYT columnists) wrote back in 2016 a single column that perhaps there was something to the myriad Bill Clinton assault allegations, and that maybe we who voted for him (like me) should stop laughing at phrases like “bimbo eruption” and start thinking big about why exactly so many “opposite” people are tainted by this.

I don’t know any democrat in real life who would have the slightest hesitation about dem names being published. Of course there are dems implicated-throw the book at them!

Would it be very discouraging to find that a dem that shocked me was on the list (meaning not Clinton, etc)-yes! But of course they should still be named.

I feel like that’s a key difference between democrats and republicans at the moment. (For example, I don’t know anyone who wasn’t completely disgusted by the Hunter Biden pardon.)

Of course but I find the self-congratulatory crap about this so pointless. Yes. I’m not Trump or MAGA, yes, release all the names.
I don’t think there’s a point to your point. PP talking Dershowitz also had no fundamental point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn’t Biden release the files??? If Trump is in there, Biden could’ve tanked Trump’s run for reelection. It must have both R and D names that neither side want released.

This has been asked and answered about thousand times. Do your own research!

The answer is simply "to protect powerful people."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why people care so much about the Epstein files. American elected a known convicted felon, adjudicated rapist, and corporate scam artist who allowed billionaires to cut science and programs for poor and middle income people to given themselves tax breaks and is hurling us into authoritarianism. There is nothing that could be in the Epstein files that would prevent the spineless republicans in congress from supporting his every illegal move.

A billionaire created a pedophile sex trafficking ring that preyed on poor girls. Other billionaires and high ranking politicians took part. Even more of them knew about what was going and did nothing. How can you not care?

This has nothing to do with "the files".

[Anonymous]

Johnson saying he won't block an Epstein vote, which makes me think they bought someone off. Sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/1275510424084021249

Remember those photos of Mr. Barak visiting Epstein’s New York apartment, either after he was arrested or after he died?

Looks like Israeli Prime minister Ehud Barak was busy beating and raping Virginia Guffrie.

Dershowitz is playing a political game. Barak did business with Epstein and was probably involved. He's on that particular list, which is entirely democrats, because Barak is in opposition to Netanyahu.

Remember that Dersh is on the list himself and was the guy digging up dirt on Guiffre and the other victims.

I think Dershowitz is worst of the worst in terms of character, and that as a Zionist who has decided he’s the worlds most hated Martha’s Vineyard resident, but nothing about that pleading is really a “political game.” Dershowitz is himself conservative (at best a contrarian civil libertarian and the nightmare of a “too smart” lawyer, who physically and legally in terms of maneuvers abused his first time til she killed herself over custody issues.) but so is Prince Andrew on that list, and we know to a certainty he did what he was accused of (photo, reputed payment of 12 million pounds).

I believe every name listed accurately lists a man who raped Giuffre or participated in an orgy with underage and of age abused and trafficked women. So yes - I believe Senators Mitchell and Richardson are in there along with Clinton, and Trump, and Andrew, and Ehud Barak.

This story is an important story to me. It provides a sense of the kind of abuse many of us don’t see. We’re in the understory, and we are all susceptible to biases where we think “our people” can’t do heinously abusive things. I’m not that deluded anymore. Michelle Goldberg (liberal oped NYT columnists) wrote back in 2016 a single column that perhaps there was something to the myriad Bill Clinton assault allegations, and that maybe we who voted for him (like me) should stop laughing at phrases like “bimbo eruption” and start thinking big about why exactly so many “opposite” people are tainted by this.

I don’t know any democrat in real life who would have the slightest hesitation about dem names being published. Of course there are dems implicated-throw the book at them!

Would it be very discouraging to find that a dem that shocked me was on the list (meaning not Clinton, etc)-yes! But of course they should still be named.

I feel like that’s a key difference between democrats and republicans at the moment. (For example, I don’t know anyone who wasn’t completely disgusted by the Hunter Biden pardon.)

Of course but I find the self-congratulatory crap about this so pointless. Yes. I’m not Trump or MAGA, yes, release all the names.
I don’t think there’s a point to your point. PP talking Dershowitz also had no fundamental point.

The point is republicans are obstructing while also implying there are tons of democrats in the files so the louder democrats say “Roger that, let’s see those files!” the more ridiculous their position looks. And since this is the only thing thing maga people seem to care about I think that’s a worthwhile goal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Johnson saying he won't block an Epstein vote, which makes me think they bought someone off. Sad.

I guess the shutdown will end now. I mean that was the whole point, right? Buying more time to threaten someone enough to get them to cave.

[Anonymous]

Release the Epstein Files and the only names that should be redacted are the girls who were abused. All the men should be exposed regardless of citizenship, job, title, or political affiliation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Johnson saying he won't block an Epstein vote, which makes me think they bought someone off. Sad.

I guess the shutdown will end now. I mean that was the whole point, right? Buying more time to threaten someone enough to get them to cave.

Nah sounds like they’ve redacted enough to only expose Democrats.

[Anonymous]

A few pages back someone asked if a poster had prosecutorial experience. I do, and I was specially trained on sexual assault prosecution and handled more than a few such cases. I call BS on Acosta’s assessment of the case, not least because I’ve followed the reporting closely and it is universally acknowledged that Acosta never met with any of the victims and never even read their statements. He is misrepresenting the assessment of the line prosecutors in his office were ready to move the case forward.

All prosecutors know that sexual assault cases have the lowest conviction rate, it IS a crap shoot no matter the strength of the evidence because jurors bring ugly biases to these cases that are part of our societal sickness regarding crimes against women and children, who are the primary victims of sexual assault. They also disbelieve male children when they testify about sexual assault. Diddy’s case is one recent example but there are many others. SA cases have only a 50% conviction rate and only 1% of cases ever go to trial. It’s awful. As a society, we essentially condone the sexual exploitation of women and children.

And yes, I have zero doubt that there are men from all along the political spectrum in those files and that we will all be dismayed if we ever get to see them. As a prosecutor I lost all my remaining illusions about people when I saw the kinds of upstanding citizens grandpas who were molesting and raping their own granddaughters and how communities would rally around such people and vilify the victims because most people DON’T REALLY WANT TO KNOW.

Anytime I had a SA case, I would have a brutal heart to heart with the victim. I would tell them the odds and the reasons for them. I would tell them that the trial process would be like being raped again even if I did my very best to enforce all rules of procedure designed to protect victims. I would promise to fight like hell and always have their backs, win or lose. And I would ask them to go home and think about it, talk to their family, their therapist, their confidants and then come back and give me my orders and I would follow them as they wished.

I don’t believe that all the victims refused to cooperate - they weren’t even given the option if you believe what they are saying now about how it all went down - and I for one DO believe them. They were sold out because at very least, Acosta is the kind of man (like SOOOOOO many men) who believes teen girls want it and are lying when they say they don’t. Especially poor white trash teen girls.

I suspect there is some truth to the conspiracy theories about next level dealings, possibly including intelligence assets, in the Epstein trafficking scheme. But even if not, it’s very much like the sexual abuse scandals of the Catholic Church, the Southern Baptist Convention, the Boy Scouts of America, etc. There are a LOT of predators in our midst, some of them are in our own families, and predators cover for other predators because they don’t want it coming home to roost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Johnson saying he won't block an Epstein vote, which makes me think they bought someone off. Sad.

I guess the shutdown will end now. I mean that was the whole point, right? Buying more time to threaten someone enough to get them to cave.

Nah sounds like they’ve redacted enough to only expose Democrats.

If there were big Democrats to be exposed they would have already released the files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A few pages back someone asked if a poster had prosecutorial experience. I do, and I was specially trained on sexual assault prosecution and handled more than a few such cases. I call BS on Acosta’s assessment of the case, not least because I’ve followed the reporting closely and it is universally acknowledged that Acosta never met with any of the victims and never even read their statements. He is misrepresenting the assessment of the line prosecutors in his office were ready to move the case forward.

All prosecutors know that sexual assault cases have the lowest conviction rate, it IS a crap shoot no matter the strength of the evidence because jurors bring ugly biases to these cases that are part of our societal sickness regarding crimes against women and children, who are the primary victims of sexual assault. They also disbelieve male children when they testify about sexual assault. Diddy’s case is one recent example but there are many others. SA cases have only a 50% conviction rate and only 1% of cases ever go to trial. It’s awful. As a society, we essentially condone the sexual exploitation of women and children.

And yes, I have zero doubt that there are men from all along the political spectrum in those files and that we will all be dismayed if we ever get to see them. As a prosecutor I lost all my remaining illusions about people when I saw the kinds of upstanding citizens grandpas who were molesting and raping their own granddaughters and how communities would rally around such people and vilify the victims because most people DON’T REALLY WANT TO KNOW.

Anytime I had a SA case, I would have a brutal heart to heart with the victim. I would tell them the odds and the reasons for them. I would tell them that the trial process would be like being raped again even if I did my very best to enforce all rules of procedure designed to protect victims. I would promise to fight like hell and always have their backs, win or lose. And I would ask them to go home and think about it, talk to their family, their therapist, their confidants and then come back and give me my orders and I would follow them as they wished.

I don’t believe that all the victims refused to cooperate - they weren’t even given the option if you believe what they are saying now about how it all went down - and I for one DO believe them. They were sold out because at very least, Acosta is the kind of man (like SOOOOOO many men) who believes teen girls want it and are lying when they say they don’t. Especially poor white trash teen girls.

I suspect there is some truth to the conspiracy theories about next level dealings, possibly including intelligence assets, in the Epstein trafficking scheme. But even if not, it’s very much like the sexual abuse scandals of the Catholic Church, the Southern Baptist Convention, the Boy Scouts of America, etc. There are a LOT of predators in our midst, some of them are in our own families, and predators cover for other predators because they don’t want it coming home to roost.

Thank you for your work.

The bolded is key. I too have lost my illusions. But it means a lot to know there are people rowing against the tide.