Haha |
I wanted to say it earlier, but I didn't want to bump the thread. I hoped it would die a natural death. |
I don't think so. Some of these are economic choices - Cheaper houses that are an hour away from DC, and with less than stellar public schools are available in DMV, but people want homes closer to their work as well as with great schools. Yes, probably having a SAHM helped with the kids going to magnet schools in this particular case, but kids of WOHMs go to magnet public schools too. And having a SAHM is no guarantee that a kid will get into magnet programs. Having a SAHM helped with childcare and school homework and it probably helped with DH's career as well....but being a SAHM also meant that there was no second pay-check. Most WOHMs make enough money to pay for childcare as well as contribute to household expenses and retirement. Not having kids for 7-8 years of marriage until you are settled is an economic choice. Not having pets is an economic choice. If you have not lived on a subsistence salary of H1B visa for years then you have no idea of why it is worse than having student debt. Anyone can payoff student debt in several years if they live on 40-50K per year. As mentioned above, not being able to afford having kids, no house, 1 cheap car, no cable, no eating out...these are economic choices that was made in the lean years that lasted for 10 years. So to have a family that is making 350K in their 30s, with a house, two cars, paying into pension fund, paying into college funds, going for vacations and with a high food budget...these people will be very wealthy and will be able to set their kids up very well in life. |
350K income here. One SAH. PITI $4600 NWDC in a 1m house. Don't need to take vacations - we've BTDT all over the world. I drive a 10-year-old Toyota with 80K miles on it, and I will drive that sumbitch into the ground, then will get on Craigslist and buy another used one and drive it for 10+ years. 1 kid in public school, 1 kid in college. We save 70K per year plus max out 401K. We DIY whatever we can and have fun doing it. We furnished our house off of Craigslist over the course of a year (West Elm, CB2, Restoration Hardware, DWR, C&B, Pottery Barn). Our house looks stylish enough and we saved a ton of money buying stuff used (hope we didn't bring in bed bugs, though). Anyway, at 350K a year, we feel super rich. I open up the car door and sit in the 10 years of stink and it's comforting. I don't worry that someone is going to scratch or ding the car, or if the dog is going to puke in it. That's freedom. Your lifestyle is high-stress with all the things you buy and what you think you need. |
A fool and his money is soon parted.
Yes, some people can earn 350K, but how many people can keep and grow it? 350K is UMC for savvy people and wealthy for savvy and frugal people. It is MC for someone who had unexpected catastrophe (illness, hurricanes, special needs) or someone who is incredibly incompetent in money management. |
To you and me, Nats tickets are not expensive. But even the cheapest seats will typically set you back $100 for a family of 4. For many families that is not an insignificant purchase. |
Do you consider having children and requiring legal on the books childcare to be incompetence? What about the $1,200 a month you’re supposed to save per kid for college? Or federal taxes? Do all of these things scream incompetence to you? |
I drove an old car for years. We don’t even use a car on a regular basis. BUT - I wouldn’t be too smug about driving a 10 year old car when you have kids. If you get in a major wreck and don’t have the latest safety features you won’t be as smug. Especially if your kid gets injured so you can save a few bucks. You’re pretty much proving the point of the post. Driving an old, probably unsafe car and shopping on Craigslist for furniture isn’t a “rich” lifestyle. What you described is very middle class. Same with not taking vacations. |
Not incompetence, but those are luxuries and/or a but a dream to most. |
MC and LC cannot afford all of these things. UMC means having kids and being able to afford legal, quality childcare. 1,200 a month for college per child is not what college costs. Most people will look at state college with 10K tuition/per year and expect their kids to work and also save for college. These are not poor kids, these are solidly MC kids. You are saving a quarter million per child for education? Dude - you are solidly UMC or UC. No one saves 50k a year for college. Most people are lucky to earn that much. |
Did you miss the part where they are saving 70k per year after maxing our 401k? They could certainly do all of these things but choose not to. |
| My God, this is a breathtakingly stupid thread. |
I agree, is is stupid that people making 350k/ year consider themselves MC. |
Not PP but I keep coming back to laugh at the people here about to pop a blood vessel arguing that $350K isn't UMC/UC because they are saving thousands upon thousands a year and have no money for white lines and hookers. |
I’m the person you quoted that finds it stupid, and personally, it doesn’t make me laugh. It just shows me how clueless the UC is. It’s frustrating and insulting to those of us that ARE the struggling MC. (Own the actual average priced house of ~200k, make the actual median wage of 60k, send kids to public school, barely save for retirement, live paycheck to paycheck with no backup, do a road trip to somewhere a few hours away for vacation if you’re even able to afford one this year, etc...) if the MC had the lifestyle some of these posters are complaining about we wouldn’t have so many people feeling left behind and angry in our country today, and might actually feel like their kids will do better than them and move up the ladder. https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2013/10/24/retirement-health-care-social-security/3169827/ many Americans don’t expect to retire (I only cite the article for the statistics, not this BS “oh everyone can save and have a plan!” Because no, if everyone just saved that would cause a recession). |