Pray for Charlotte, NC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:22 eyewitnesses are now saying that it was not the black officer who shot that man to two people who are willing to go on camera or saying that was not the shooter

That should have been two eyewitnesses
auto correct!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:22 eyewitnesses are now saying that it was not the black officer who shot that man to two people who are willing to go on camera or saying that was not the shooter

what?

I'm confused by your post.

The cop didn't shoot at him? Then who did?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: And this latest witness is a white woman who says that Scott is out there every day waiting for his son get off the school bus and he's in his car reading a book.

i wonder why the book wasn't found but a gun was.

[Anonymous]

22 eyewitnesses are now saying that it was not the black officer who shot that man to two people who are willing to go on camera or saying that was not the shooter

Remember Michael Brown's pal? The one who lied to everyone present? He is probably the responsible party for the riots in Ferguson. Turns out that other witnesses were also present and they disagreed. As for the witness who said that Scott sat and read a book every day--maybe, he did. He chose the wrong day to roll a blunt instead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: And this latest witness is a white woman who says that Scott is out there every day waiting for his son get off the school bus and he's in his car reading a book.

i wonder why the book wasn't found but a gun was.

Exactly. Was the Quran found or not? Or was that just another inflammatory bit of fuel placed on the fire.

Also to the PP. What does that have to do with anything? He clearly had a gun, which was illegal for a felon to possses. He was clearly doing something his wife was telling him not to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

22 eyewitnesses are now saying that it was not the black officer who shot that man to two people who are willing to go on camera or saying that was not the shooter

Remember Michael Brown's pal? The one who lied to everyone present? He is probably the responsible party for the riots in Ferguson. Turns out that other witnesses were also present and they disagreed. As for the witness who said that Scott sat and read a book every day--maybe, he did. He chose the wrong day to roll a blunt instead.

Witnesses who tell their stories to the media are not credible. If you are witness to a crime you give your statement to the police and then you keep quiet in case you need to testify.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: And this latest witness is a white woman who says that Scott is out there every day waiting for his son get off the school bus and he's in his car reading a book.

i wonder why the book wasn't found but a gun was.

Exactly. Was the Quran found or not? Or was that just another inflammatory bit of fuel placed on the fire.

Also to the PP. What does that have to do with anything? He clearly had a gun, which was illegal for a felon to possses. He was clearly doing something his wife was telling him not to do.

and why wear a gun holster ankle if you're just reading a book?

[Anonymous]

^^ *on your ankle

the holster was clearly empty in the video, so where was the gun? if the police were screaming at him to DROP the gun, i'd guess it was in his hand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

22 eyewitnesses are now saying that it was not the black officer who shot that man to two people who are willing to go on camera or saying that was not the shooter

Remember Michael Brown's pal? The one who lied to everyone present? He is probably the responsible party for the riots in Ferguson. Turns out that other witnesses were also present and they disagreed. As for the witness who said that Scott sat and read a book every day--maybe, he did. He chose the wrong day to roll a blunt instead.

Witnesses who tell their stories to the media are not credible. If you are witness to a crime you give your statement to the police and then you keep quiet in case you need to testify.

Yea
Ok

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:22 eyewitnesses are now saying that it was not the black officer who shot that man to two people who are willing to go on camera or saying that was not the shooter

what?

I'm confused by your post.

The cop didn't shoot at him? Then who did?

She says it was the white officer.

[Anonymous]

If you don't think your message is being heard by those in power (mainly whites), then why bother? Instead of rioting, take back the schools first. Do more outreach to communities. Partner up with libraries. Seek out grants for funding creative projects. Bring in local doctors to talk about healthy living. Redesign the schedule to include time for town hall meetings. It's all possible.

Look, whoever you are, if you're going to get push back from what we used to call "the man," then ignore the man, do a Farrakhan, and rebuild communities through grass roots efforts. There is no trust with the police; there is no trust with your average white person. That's all we hear on these boards. If you don't trust others, then put your trust in the black community leaders and do something.

Protect the kids by educating them first. You know the majority of prisoners are illiterate - something astounding like 3/4 of the prison population. What's the hope in finding a job when you're illiterate? in reading a rental lease or obtaining a mortgage when you're illiterate? of attending college?

Work with the schools. It's not easy, but it's the only hope. Keep the kids off the streets where they get involved in gangs and buy and sell drugs - and worse.

Whites are the enemy. So go around the whites. Work around black cops who won't side with you.

I don't know what else to say - not that you care b/c you're still going to call me a goddamn racist.

But it is what it is. You can change the system by first rebuilding. The more you educate the young, the stronger the communities become.


truth

Your post should have its own thread. Its an important discussion that needs to be had.

Totally agree but here's why it won't catch on.

All of the above stuff is hard to do. If you just take the approach that there's no way to overcome racist whiteys than you don't have to do all that hard stuff AND you get to feel morally superior. People are inherently lazy and enjoy feeling like they're better than other people.

I wrote the first post - and corrected some mistakes.

As a white person, I don't believe you can change people - at least not the current older generation. I'm 50. I've been an educator for over 20 years, and I've seen kids change over the years - becoming more distant, trusting people less and less.

So no, I don't see hope in lessening tension, in changing mindsets. Until we become a brown nation, this division will always exist. However, that doesn't mean that communities can't help themselves. That's a sad vision to paint, as there are many dedicated individuals in communities who feel isolated. This can only change when people start to connect. There's no other way, imo, to reshape struggling communities.

But expecting white people to join in the cause (most whites,as I can't speak for all whites) won't amount to much. We've passed the kumbaya stage of the 60s and 70s, and people are too angry, feeling too threatened to even care. Remember that during the 60s whites made up almost 90% of the population. So when they were fighting for a cause during the 60, lifting the spirits and rights of 10% of the population wouldn't affect them much. As white numbers shrink, so does white security.

again - truth

But I'm confused as to who's too lazy to change? whites? blacks? I agree that moral superiority is key. We always try to one up each other - even w/in cultures.

But who's one upping whom in your case?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:22 eyewitnesses are now saying that it was not the black officer who shot that man to two people who are willing to go on camera or saying that was not the shooter

what?

I'm confused by your post.

The cop didn't shoot at him? Then who did?

She says it was the white officer.

ahh

ok

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: And this latest witness is a white woman who says that Scott is out there every day waiting for his son get off the school bus and he's in his car reading a book.

i wonder why the book wasn't found but a gun was.

Exactly. Was the Quran found or not? Or was that just another inflammatory bit of fuel placed on the fire.

Also to the PP. What does that have to do with anything? He clearly had a gun, which was illegal for a felon to possses. He was clearly doing something his wife was telling him not to do.

Yea gun was found
Just like that female cop in ga that said a black man shit her
Just like the cop in St. Louis who planted the gun and said he was going to kill the suspect before he shot him
Just like Holtzclaw
Yea cops NEVER do anything wrong
The police depts never hire idiots and fail to train them
Never happens

[Anonymous]

Of course, she did. Myth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:22 eyewitnesses are now saying that it was not the black officer who shot that man to two people who are willing to go on camera or saying that was not the shooter

what?

I'm confused by your post.

The cop didn't shoot at him? Then who did?

She says it was the white officer.

ahh

ok

Ah
Ok
She's not the only one who says so