REV Soccer Only CHAT, No drama please

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lots of clubs/coaches opt for no sound on their VEO recordings. Does kinda seem suspicious but my DD's coach opts for no sound and I have no reason to beleive it's to cover abusive language on the sideline - he's quiet as a mouse from what I can tell. Too quiet, IMO!

You don't have any thing to worry about then. It's easy for parents to hear what the coach does and most coaches are yelling at their players and certainly not demeaning them. Some do and some do it with no consequences.

[Anonymous]

"aren't"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I would be very suspicious of ANY coach who insists on sound being removed from the VEO for even one game or one portion of a game, let alone every game.

We have a team veo and can hear everything our coach tells the players.

At FCV, the GA program stopped playing/recording the (VEO) sound so that they (a coach or several coaches) couldn't be caught yelling. (It happened every game). It might be why at least one of the coaches who ended up at VRSC was terminated. Nobody really gave a full explanation but one day suddenly that coach moved to VRSC with out explanation and mid season. At least one parent believed it was a firing. It may have been the same parent that complained about the demeaning comments yelled by that coach on the field as the player frequently received this abuse. This same coach now at VRSC is now back at it, bringing female players to tears on the field the way he treats them. The parents of the player have tolerated it because they believe the coach will get their dd recruited. Just an opinion or hypothesis, but sounds familiar. Another hypothesis is that something similar happened with this person at GF based on what is being said here. Yelling and demeaning a player on the field is abuse by definition. RAT took a while (a few seasons) before it set in that her actions were intolerable and a force out would occur. Clubs that allow this type of activity are trash IMHO. Zero tolerance for violating the law.

The FCV Veo was done by BP. No videos had sound. VDA is the same. Do CC’s games have sound?

They did until they didn't. Which just coincidently happened to occur shortly after RATatouille got busted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I would be very suspicious of ANY coach who insists on sound being removed from the VEO for even one game or one portion of a game, let alone every game.

We have a team veo and can hear everything our coach tells the players.

At FCV, the GA program stopped playing/recording the (VEO) sound so that they (a coach or several coaches) couldn't be caught yelling. (It happened every game). It might be why at least one of the coaches who ended up at VRSC was terminated. Nobody really gave a full explanation but one day suddenly that coach moved to VRSC with out explanation and mid season. At least one parent believed it was a firing. It may have been the same parent that complained about the demeaning comments yelled by that coach on the field as the player frequently received this abuse. This same coach now at VRSC is now back at it, bringing female players to tears on the field the way he treats them. The parents of the player have tolerated it because they believe the coach will get their dd recruited. Just an opinion or hypothesis, but sounds familiar. Another hypothesis is that something similar happened with this person at GF based on what is being said here. Yelling and demeaning a player on the field is abuse by definition. RAT took a while (a few seasons) before it set in that her actions were intolerable and a force out would occur. Clubs that allow this type of activity are trash IMHO. Zero tolerance for violating the law.

The FCV Veo was done by BP. No videos had sound. VDA is the same. Do CC’s games have sound?

They did until they didn't. Which just coincidently happened to occur shortly after RATatouille got busted.

09 parent told me. They said I could post here for the he said she said police. All of CC’s games this season have sound. Sometimes they are on bench side and sometimes on team side.

[Anonymous]

Any of GD's games publicly watchable so we can see his behavior for ourselves?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any of GD's games publicly watchable so we can see his behavior for ourselves?

With sound please!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any of GD's games publicly watchable so we can see his behavior for ourselves?

With sound please!

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I would be very suspicious of ANY coach who insists on sound being removed from the VEO for even one game or one portion of a game, let alone every game.

We have a team veo and can hear everything our coach tells the players.

At FCV, the GA program stopped playing/recording the (VEO) sound so that they (a coach or several coaches) couldn't be caught yelling. (It happened every game). It might be why at least one of the coaches who ended up at VRSC was terminated. Nobody really gave a full explanation but one day suddenly that coach moved to VRSC with out explanation and mid season. At least one parent believed it was a firing. It may have been the same parent that complained about the demeaning comments yelled by that coach on the field as the player frequently received this abuse. This same coach now at VRSC is now back at it, bringing female players to tears on the field the way he treats them. The parents of the player have tolerated it because they believe the coach will get their dd recruited. Just an opinion or hypothesis, but sounds familiar. Another hypothesis is that something similar happened with this person at GF based on what is being said here. Yelling and demeaning a player on the field is abuse by definition. RAT took a while (a few seasons) before it set in that her actions were intolerable and a force out would occur. Clubs that allow this type of activity are trash IMHO. Zero tolerance for violating the law.

The FCV Veo was done by BP. No videos had sound. VDA is the same. Do CC’s games have sound?

They did until they didn't. Which just coincidently happened to occur shortly after RATatouille got busted.

09 parent told me. They said I could post here for the he said she said police. All of CC’s games this season have sound. Sometimes they are on bench side and sometimes on team side.

Say you are a 2009 parent without saying you are a 2009 parent!

The previous reference was to FCV (recordings) not VRSC now. It also references BP who never was employed by Va Revolution was he? Does this mean that the VRSC recordings have available proof for the above commenters of CC's lunatic ranting or making girls go to tears? Same would be true for G if he transfers to that club. Not sure it matters because nobody ever does or says anything out of fear of retaliation in these situations and these clubs DO retaliate. The people on this blog will complain and complain about it though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I would be very suspicious of ANY coach who insists on sound being removed from the VEO for even one game or one portion of a game, let alone every game.

We have a team veo and can hear everything our coach tells the players.

At FCV, the GA program stopped playing/recording the (VEO) sound so that they (a coach or several coaches) couldn't be caught yelling. (It happened every game). It might be why at least one of the coaches who ended up at VRSC was terminated. Nobody really gave a full explanation but one day suddenly that coach moved to VRSC with out explanation and mid season. At least one parent believed it was a firing. It may have been the same parent that complained about the demeaning comments yelled by that coach on the field as the player frequently received this abuse. This same coach now at VRSC is now back at it, bringing female players to tears on the field the way he treats them. The parents of the player have tolerated it because they believe the coach will get their dd recruited. Just an opinion or hypothesis, but sounds familiar. Another hypothesis is that something similar happened with this person at GF based on what is being said here. Yelling and demeaning a player on the field is abuse by definition. RAT took a while (a few seasons) before it set in that her actions were intolerable and a force out would occur. Clubs that allow this type of activity are trash IMHO. Zero tolerance for violating the law.

The FCV Veo was done by BP. No videos had sound. VDA is the same. Do CC’s games have sound?

Highly doubt it. He’s a male version of RAT. With a pinch of angry German punch to his stupidity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't VEO recording how the Loudoun 09 girls coach ended up getting fired, too? Verbal abuse caught on video? It's crazy how much this goes on and how much parents and clubs tolerate it.

Yes, RAT is who is being referenced above - she was the Loudoun 09 girls coach

It took Loudoun 3 years to figure that out despite the complaints. That team was split 50/50 on her antics.

Most parents only accept this so their child can be on the top team or get recruited. It's not a good reason to justify accepting the behavior. The LS team she coached was for some time considered a top team in the country We hear almost every month about new situations where college coaches are abusing female players.

[Anonymous]

For those who don't know. The Camera may switch sides between parents and coach's side, because the camera should be set up with the sun to the back of the camera.

Who ever shares the video link make share it muted or with sound. The video's always record the sound, but its an option to not share that. (Usually due to poor language from the parents.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:personally I would be very suspicious of ANY coach who insists on sound being removed from the VEO for even one game or one portion of a game, let alone every game.

We have a team veo and can hear everything our coach tells the players.

At FCV, the GA program stopped playing/recording the (VEO) sound so that they (a coach or several coaches) couldn't be caught yelling. (It happened every game). It might be why at least one of the coaches who ended up at VRSC was terminated. Nobody really gave a full explanation but one day suddenly that coach moved to VRSC with out explanation and mid season. At least one parent believed it was a firing. It may have been the same parent that complained about the demeaning comments yelled by that coach on the field as the player frequently received this abuse. This same coach now at VRSC is now back at it, bringing female players to tears on the field the way he treats them. The parents of the player have tolerated it because they believe the coach will get their dd recruited. Just an opinion or hypothesis, but sounds familiar. Another hypothesis is that something similar happened with this person at GF based on what is being said here. Yelling and demeaning a player on the field is abuse by definition. RAT took a while (a few seasons) before it set in that her actions were intolerable and a force out would occur. Clubs that allow this type of activity are trash IMHO. Zero tolerance for violating the law.

The FCV Veo was done by BP. No videos had sound. VDA is the same. Do CC’s games have sound?

We're at another club but all of our VEOs have sound. Why on earth would any respectable coach not want sound?

avoid accountability and or losing coaches. See the RAT story above. Coach got results but it came with a price. the little snitch in the sky was to blame. There was another coach that almost got the same treatment but he got smart and moved the veo near the chattering parents sideline. veo then snitched on the parents.

[Anonymous]

Thanks coach. It's always the parents.

[Anonymous]

VEO is about studying film, volume and chatter seem annoying if I was the coach trying to study film. I don’t disagree the volume gives some context. Seems like people just look to find ways to be pissed off. Also, I saw someone say they see parents video-ing behind coaches and players during games? Never would that happen in any league. Someone back this??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:VEO is about studying film, volume and chatter seem annoying if I was the coach trying to study film. I don’t disagree the volume gives some context. Seems like people just look to find ways to be pissed off. Also, I saw someone say they see parents video-ing behind coaches and players during games? Never would that happen in any league. Someone back this??

shhhh!!!!!!! Stop snitching