Judge Lewis Kaplan rules that a Jury found that Trump RAPED E. Jean Carroll as the word 'RAPE' is commonly used

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side.

She was asked about it and answered and you don't like her answers.

No, I’m just not buying it. I would not set aside my negative feelings about a guy who raped me just to promote my friends’ tv appearances.

And if they were really my friends, they certainly wouldn’t go on his show!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side.

She was asked about it and answered and you don't like her answers.

No, I’m just not buying it. I would not set aside my negative feelings about a guy who raped me just to promote my friends’ tv appearances.

Ok and I don't believe the access Hollywood comments are just locker room talk. You vote for trump and I will vote against him and on we go. Unless you or I are in a swing state, it won't affect the outcome anyway.

[Anonymous]

I find her believable for several reasons.

Trump himself has said that when you're rich, you can do anything, including grabbing women by their p*$$ies.

He has admitted to walking backstage at the beauty contests he owned, and ogling the contestants while they're changing, and naked. This is backed up by several former contestants.

His first wife claimed that he raped her.

These two women are not the only ones that claim that Trump raped them.

It is entirely within his character to rape women.

Carroll may not have filed charges against him, but she did tell two separate friends about the incident. Well before her book or profit motive or anything else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find her believable for several reasons.

Trump himself has said that when you're rich, you can do anything, including grabbing women by their p*$$ies.

He has admitted to walking backstage at the beauty contests he owned, and ogling the contestants while they're changing, and naked. This is backed up by several former contestants.

His first wife claimed that he raped her.

These two women are not the only ones that claim that Trump raped them.

It is entirely within his character to rape women.

Carroll may not have filed charges against him, but she did tell two separate friends about the incident. Well before her book or profit motive or anything else.

What an insult and an embarrassment to have such a man in the presidency. Shame on us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side.

She was asked about it and answered and you don't like her answers.

No, I’m just not buying it. I would not set aside my negative feelings about a guy who raped me just to promote my friends’ tv appearances.

Clearly you've never experienced sexual harassment or assault or unwanted sexual attention. I was sexually assaulted some years ago and didn't recognize it as such, was mostly shocked when it happened and dismissed it as simply an irritation. Did not yell out and take it to the police. Because it was the sort of thing that society tells women we just put up with. No big deal. Pushed it out of my mind even though it made me feel icky at the time. Now I recognize it for what it was. Lots of women go through this. I've had several friends who were raped at parties but never said a word about it except in confidence to their closest inner circle. Why? Because of people like you who refuse to believe their stories. YOU are the sort of person who makes women decide not to speak up. YOU.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side.

She was asked about it and answered and you don't like her answers.

No, I’m just not buying it. I would not set aside my negative feelings about a guy who raped me just to promote my friends’ tv appearances.

Clearly you've never experienced sexual harassment or assault or unwanted sexual attention. I was sexually assaulted some years ago and didn't recognize it as such, was mostly shocked when it happened and dismissed it as simply an irritation. Did not yell out and take it to the police. Because it was the sort of thing that society tells women we just put up with. No big deal. Pushed it out of my mind even though it made me feel icky at the time. Now I recognize it for what it was. Lots of women go through this. I've had several friends who were raped at parties but never said a word about it except in confidence to their closest inner circle. Why? Because of people like you who refuse to believe their stories. YOU are the sort of person who makes women decide not to speak up. YOU.

YOU are absolutely wrong on so many things. I have experienced plenty of unwanted attention and harassment in public, in private and at work. I find her in particular unbelievable not because she didn’t say anything at the time but because of all of the things she did, and said after that, including tweeting about her love of Trump’s television show. She clearly has a profit motive, and her gloating about the money is disgusting. I also know good men who have been falsely accused and if you think, rape is a horrific thing as I do, then being accused of it is horrific as well.

I don’t believe all women because some women lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side.

She was asked about it and answered and you don't like her answers.

No, I’m just not buying it. I would not set aside my negative feelings about a guy who raped me just to promote my friends’ tv appearances.

Clearly you've never experienced sexual harassment or assault or unwanted sexual attention. I was sexually assaulted some years ago and didn't recognize it as such, was mostly shocked when it happened and dismissed it as simply an irritation. Did not yell out and take it to the police. Because it was the sort of thing that society tells women we just put up with. No big deal. Pushed it out of my mind even though it made me feel icky at the time. Now I recognize it for what it was. Lots of women go through this. I've had several friends who were raped at parties but never said a word about it except in confidence to their closest inner circle. Why? Because of people like you who refuse to believe their stories. YOU are the sort of person who makes women decide not to speak up. YOU.

YOU are absolutely wrong on so many things. I have experienced plenty of unwanted attention and harassment in public, in private and at work. I find her in particular unbelievable not because she didn’t say anything at the time but because of all of the things she did, and said after that, including tweeting about her love of Trump’s television show. She clearly has a profit motive, and her gloating about the money is disgusting. I also know good men who have been falsely accused and if you think, rape is a horrific thing as I do, then being accused of it is horrific as well.

I don’t believe all women because some women lie.

Also, I am sorry that that happened to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side.

She was asked about it and answered and you don't like her answers.

No, I’m just not buying it. I would not set aside my negative feelings about a guy who raped me just to promote my friends’ tv appearances.

Clearly you've never experienced sexual harassment or assault or unwanted sexual attention. I was sexually assaulted some years ago and didn't recognize it as such, was mostly shocked when it happened and dismissed it as simply an irritation. Did not yell out and take it to the police. Because it was the sort of thing that society tells women we just put up with. No big deal. Pushed it out of my mind even though it made me feel icky at the time. Now I recognize it for what it was. Lots of women go through this. I've had several friends who were raped at parties but never said a word about it except in confidence to their closest inner circle. Why? Because of people like you who refuse to believe their stories. YOU are the sort of person who makes women decide not to speak up. YOU.

YOU are absolutely wrong on so many things. I have experienced plenty of unwanted attention and harassment in public, in private and at work. I find her in particular unbelievable not because she didn’t say anything at the time but because of all of the things she did, and said after that, including tweeting about her love of Trump’s television show. She clearly has a profit motive, and her gloating about the money is disgusting. I also know good men who have been falsely accused and if you think, rape is a horrific thing as I do, then being accused of it is horrific as well.

I don’t believe all women because some women lie.

She did say something at the time, though. To two of her friends, both of whom testified in the proceedings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side.

She was asked about it and answered and you don't like her answers.

No, I’m just not buying it. I would not set aside my negative feelings about a guy who raped me just to promote my friends’ tv appearances.

Clearly you've never experienced sexual harassment or assault or unwanted sexual attention. I was sexually assaulted some years ago and didn't recognize it as such, was mostly shocked when it happened and dismissed it as simply an irritation. Did not yell out and take it to the police. Because it was the sort of thing that society tells women we just put up with. No big deal. Pushed it out of my mind even though it made me feel icky at the time. Now I recognize it for what it was. Lots of women go through this. I've had several friends who were raped at parties but never said a word about it except in confidence to their closest inner circle. Why? Because of people like you who refuse to believe their stories. YOU are the sort of person who makes women decide not to speak up. YOU.

YOU are absolutely wrong on so many things. I have experienced plenty of unwanted attention and harassment in public, in private and at work. I find her in particular unbelievable not because she didn’t say anything at the time but because of all of the things she did, and said after that, including tweeting about her love of Trump’s television show. She clearly has a profit motive, and her gloating about the money is disgusting. I also know good men who have been falsely accused and if you think, rape is a horrific thing as I do, then being accused of it is horrific as well.

I don’t believe all women because some women lie.

She did say something at the time, though. To two of her friends, both of whom testified in the proceedings.

And not only that but Trump BRAGGED about being able to assault women. That is on tape. We all heard it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And not only that but Trump BRAGGED about being able to assault women. That is on tape. We all heard it.

+1

It’s not like he’s some morally impeccable person for whom this is a surprise. E. Jean Carroll was one of dozens of women who accused Trump of sexual harassment, sexual assault or rape. A crime he brags about and thinks is not a crime at all, that as a famous man he is entitled to use women’s bodies however he wishes!

And still people think he didn’t do this? Some people will believe anything to protect their beliefs.

[Anonymous]

There are dozens of women waiting for their day in court to tell their story of aexual assault by Donald j. Trump.

[Anonymous]

Indelible in the hippocampus.

[Anonymous]

Never forget who the rapist is alongside the thugs he commands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are dozens of women waiting for their day in court to tell their story of aexual assault by Donald j. Trump.

Most of them will never get to go to court. But Donald Trump will always be, officially, a rapist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are dozens of women waiting for their day in court to tell their story of aexual assault by Donald j. Trump.

What are they waiting for?