Judge Lewis Kaplan rules that a Jury found that Trump RAPED E. Jean Carroll as the word 'RAPE' is commonly used

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

+1. We all know what trump is. What kind of ignorant sluts respect his disrespect for women. Maybe he will get a chance to see what it is like to be sexually assaulted in prison and see how much he likes it.

If that orange POS goes to prison, the Secret Service will go with him. I doubt he'll be sexually assaulted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

You disagree with the fact that 70% of women who are sexually assaulted do not report their assault? Ugh. Take a poll of all of your female friends and relatives about their own experiences and come back and relay the results.

I would say at least a third of my female friends and relatives have experienced some kind sexual assault from groping to rape. Probably more. I am among them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

+1. We all know what trump is. What kind of ignorant sluts respect his disrespect for women. Maybe he will get a chance to see what it is like to be sexually assaulted in prison and see how much he likes it.

If that orange POS goes to prison, the Secret Service will go with him. I doubt he'll be sexually assaulted.

I could almost feel sorry for the SS, almost but not quite.

[Anonymous]

He’s not going to prison. None of the counts in this case have a mandatory minimum jail sentence. I wish I was wrong but he won’t be going to jail if he’s convicted here.

[Anonymous]

Uggh. Well maybe he will just get rammed against a wall and groped in a department store one day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

If you’re so well informed, why didn’t you know she didn’t report the sexual assault to authorities when it happened and why she didn’t report it? Her reasoning wasn’t a secret, nor was it a mystery, as it happens literally every day. Many, maybe even most women don’t report sexual assaults because they’re afraid they won’t be believed, especially when their attacker is someone powerful/wealthy/well liked.

When people ask “innocent” questions like why wasn’t the rape prosecuted when it happened, there’s an implication that the rape was reported and that the powers that be chose not to prosecute. A better question would be why don’t women feel like they can safely report crimes committed against them, or why aren’t their attackers held accountable more often? There are many studies and a multitude of personal accounts from women that speak to why women don’t report rapes and other sexual assaults when they happen. They’re rarely prosecuted successfully, but sexual assaults aren’t rare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side.

She was asked about it and answered and you don't like her answers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.

It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?

Why are you so misinformed? He was not prosecuted for rape. He was sued. If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case.

Trust me, I am well informed. She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really? Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you.

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question? if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted? plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police. 5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.

Thank you! I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.

Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole.

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive. Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.

You are a fool. This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look. It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter.

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.

What are you talking about? No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence.

A justice system jury found her claims to be true. I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side.

She was asked about it and answered and you don't like her answers.

No, I’m just not buying it. I would not set aside my negative feelings about a guy who raped me just to promote my friends’ tv appearances.