Reply to Judge Lewis Kaplan rules that a Jury found that Trump RAPED E. Jean Carroll as the word 'RAPE' is commonly used

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Judge Lewis Kaplan rules that a Jury found that Trump RAPED E. Jean Carroll as the word 'RAPE' is commonly used"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Imagine losing an appeal on one case while you’re securing the bond for another case while you’re on trial for still another case, while the Supreme Court is weighing arguments in yet another case…and those aren’t even all the cases you have pending right now. 😂[/quote]

This would be enough to kill an ordinary human being.  [/quote]
It takes a strong drive, a cult-like mafia, and no conscience whatsoever to commit so many crimes in so many jurisdictions, refuse to stop defaming someone even after a multimillion dollar civil verdict, and get other people to pay your legal fees. It helps to have personally appointed 1/3 of the Supreme Court.[/quote]

I hope you know that 40% of the country agrees with you that Trump is a one man crime wave, but the other 60% believes that the countless civil and criminal matters are politically motivated to take him out before the election. if he committed so many crimes, in so many jurisdictions, over so many years (i.e, the "rape" was in the mid 1990's), why is it all being prosecuted in 2024?[/quote]

Why are you so misinformed?  [b]He was not prosecuted for rape[/b].  He was sued.  If you don’t know the difference, keep your trap shut and read up on the case. [/quote]

Trust me, I am well informed.  She claims that he raped her in a department store in 1996, so why was it not prosecuted criminally back at the time?  [/quote]

Are you this ignorant of sexual assault to not know why women don’t speak up at the time of their assault? Really?  Hope you don’t have daughters or women/girls who are close to you. [/quote]

without deflecting with ad hominem attacks, can you answer the question?  if a rape was committed in 1996, why was it not prosecuted?  plenty of rapes do get prosecuted within the time allowed by law, but this one was not.  [/quote]

It was not prosecuted because she did not report it to law enforcement at the time.

"Carroll explained that she did not go to police when the incident happened, and did not come forward sooner due to concerns that she’d be dismissed. At the time, she told two friends about the incident, both of whom confirmed to New York magazine that she’d relayed the assault to them. Carroll has also said that her decision to speak publicly about the alleged attack changed when allegations against other prominent men like Harvey Weinstein began to emerge."

This is nothing unexpected. Per DOJ statistics, the vast majority (nearly 70%) of women that are sexually assaulted do not report it to the police.  5.7% are arrested, 1.1% prosecuted, and 0.7% convicted.  [/quote]

Thank you!  I disagree with you, but I respect you a lot more when you use facts to make your point instead of petty sarcastic attacks.[/quote]
Np- well, there is broad agreement here that you are a victim blaming/slut shaming a hole. [/quote]

She didn’t report to the police for 25 years, and then she included the story in a book where she had a profit motive, and told the story in court where she had a political motive.  Calling me names proves what we all know, which is that you can’t argue the facts.   [/quote]

You are a fool.    This man has showed you who he is regarding women many times and you are refusing to look.   It's ugly but not looking at it won't change reality.[/quote]

If you believe Carroll, then presumably, she knew who he was and yet she had no trouble gushing over her love for watching The Apprentice on Twitter. [/quote]

Typical victim blaming.

I have no idea what you do or don't watch but whatever garbage it is, you don't deserve to be thrown against a wall and assaulted by a big thug.[/quote]

What are you talking about?  No one is blaming the victim. My point is that, years after the alleged assault, Carroll was loving watching the Apprentice and talking about it on Twitter. That tends to make me think it was less likely that Trump assaulted her, but the jury wasn’t allowed to know about the tweets as the judge excluded that evidence. [/quote]

A justice system jury found her claims to be true.    I think we will go with our legal system over some anonymous DCUM poster.[/quote]

Sure, just dismiss me because I presented a fact you don’t like because it cuts against what you want to believe and the jury was not allowed to hear about it. There are still people who are interested in the truth and not just the narrative that helps your side. [/quote]

She was asked about it and answered and you don't like her answers.

[/quote]

No, I’m just not buying it. I would not set aside my negative feelings about a guy who raped me just to promote my friends’ tv appearances. [/quote]

Ok and I don't believe the access Hollywood comments are just locker room talk.   You vote for trump and I will vote against him and on we go.  Unless you or I are in a swing state, it won't affect the outcome anyway.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics