New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SC surf was below average in GA. But now ECNL hats will say they’re awesome.

So ECNL is taking GA lower tier clubs again? Just like SSS Ukies (they proved to be quite a turd) etc. On top of that ECNL is diluting their brand by bringing up all kinds of questionable RL clubs.

Not a good showing do far this season. But Im sure the ECNL hats will try to spin it into something its not.

What is SSS Ukies? You mean Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals? They're doing better than a lot of the bottom feeders in a very tough North Atlantic conference. 2013s just beat PDA Blue who was top 10 in the country earlier today. They have a lot of talent, just some questionable coaching

Yeah Ukies is Philadelphia Ukranian Nationals, but SSS is South Shore Select from Massachusetts

Got it! I thought this was some really bad joke, but thanks for clarifying

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SC surf was below average in GA. But now ECNL hats will say they’re awesome.

So ECNL is taking GA lower tier clubs again? Just like SSS Ukies (they proved to be quite a turd) etc. On top of that ECNL is diluting their brand by bringing up all kinds of questionable RL clubs.

Not a good showing do far this season. But Im sure the ECNL hats will try to spin it into something its not.

keep them wet dreams going...it's a great laugh

girls club rankings

ECNL:
Team Boca: #115
SC Surf: #107
Lonestar #50


GA:
Carolina Core # 512
Oklahoma Celtic # 410
Kansas City Legends: #190

Other than Boca they're all pretty terrible.

no they are not...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SC surf was below average in GA. But now ECNL hats will say they’re awesome.

So ECNL is taking GA lower tier clubs again? Just like SSS Ukies (they proved to be quite a turd) etc. On top of that ECNL is diluting their brand by bringing up all kinds of questionable RL clubs.

Not a good showing do far this season. But Im sure the ECNL hats will try to spin it into something its not.

Maybe do some research before talking nonsense. SC Surf had all but 1 make GA playoffs when they were in it. Now in RL they lost 4 total games out of 70 something...

[Anonymous]

The rumor is if ECNL boys is not bought out by some major venture capitalists and combine with MLSN. ECNL is going to start kicking out girls clubs with MLSN boys. The reason they have not started is because some clubs are going to separate boys from girls as two clubs if the merger does not happen.

You will either be all ECNL or not ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The rumor is if ECNL boys is not bought out by some major venture capitalists and combine with MLSN. ECNL is going to start kicking out girls clubs with MLSN boys. The reason they have not started is because some clubs are going to separate boys from girls as two clubs if the merger does not happen.

You will either be all ECNL or not ECNL.

There is more money in the boys game, that would be a foolish move from ecnl and give a helping hand to GA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The rumor is if ECNL boys is not bought out by some major venture capitalists and combine with MLSN. ECNL is going to start kicking out girls clubs with MLSN boys. The reason they have not started is because some clubs are going to separate boys from girls as two clubs if the merger does not happen.

You will either be all ECNL or not ECNL.

You mean like ECNL did to former DA clubs after DA blew up?

Everything old is new again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The rumor is if ECNL boys is not bought out by some major venture capitalists and combine with MLSN. ECNL is going to start kicking out girls clubs with MLSN boys. The reason they have not started is because some clubs are going to separate boys from girls as two clubs if the merger does not happen.

You will either be all ECNL or not ECNL.

There is more money in the boys game, that would be a foolish move from ecnl and give a helping hand to GA

[Anonymous]

Not true.

Although I do find interesting that so cal blues has DPL……hmmm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SC surf was below average in GA. But now ECNL hats will say they’re awesome.

So ECNL is taking GA lower tier clubs again? Just like SSS Ukies (they proved to be quite a turd) etc. On top of that ECNL is diluting their brand by bringing up all kinds of questionable RL clubs.

Not a good showing do far this season. But Im sure the ECNL hats will try to spin it into something its not.

Maybe do some research before talking nonsense. SC Surf had all but 1 make GA playoffs when they were in it. Now in RL they lost 4 total games out of 70 something...

100%. its just the GA headbands trolling. facts matter. all 3 clubs ECNL promoted are really good clubs overall.

girls club rankings

ECNL:
Team Boca: #115
SC Surf: #107
Lonestar #50


GA:
Carolina Core # 512
Oklahoma Celtic # 410
Kansas City Legends: #190

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The rumor is if ECNL boys is not bought out by some major venture capitalists and combine with MLSN. ECNL is going to start kicking out girls clubs with MLSN boys. The reason they have not started is because some clubs are going to separate boys from girls as two clubs if the merger does not happen.

You will either be all ECNL or not ECNL.

doesn't make sense cause there are clubs that have ECNL boys but their girls side were rejected from moving to ECNL from another league or not promoted to RL or moved to GA because ECNL denied their Girls entry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SC surf was below average in GA. But now ECNL hats will say they’re awesome.

So ECNL is taking GA lower tier clubs again? Just like SSS Ukies (they proved to be quite a turd) etc. On top of that ECNL is diluting their brand by bringing up all kinds of questionable RL clubs.

Not a good showing do far this season. But Im sure the ECNL hats will try to spin it into something its not.

Maybe do some research before talking nonsense. SC Surf had all but 1 make GA playoffs when they were in it. Now in RL they lost 4 total games out of 70 something...

100%. its just the GA headbands trolling. facts matter. all 3 clubs ECNL promoted are really good clubs overall.

girls club rankings

ECNL:
Team Boca: #115
SC Surf: #107
Lonestar #50


GA:
Carolina Core # 512
Oklahoma Celtic # 410
Kansas City Legends: #190

On paper ECNL added the higher-ranked clubs right now. But GA’s move seems pretty clearly about the future, not just current rankings. Carolina Core, Oklahoma Celtic, and KC Legends all sit in strategic markets where there’s real room to grow, and they have the kind of leadership and infrastructure that could eventually challenge ECNL clubs locally.

So yes, ECNL added three very good clubs today. But GA’s additions look like long-term market plays with upside. Different strategies, not necessarily a win/lose situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SC surf was below average in GA. But now ECNL hats will say they’re awesome.

So ECNL is taking GA lower tier clubs again? Just like SSS Ukies (they proved to be quite a turd) etc. On top of that ECNL is diluting their brand by bringing up all kinds of questionable RL clubs.

Not a good showing do far this season. But Im sure the ECNL hats will try to spin it into something its not.

Maybe do some research before talking nonsense. SC Surf had all but 1 make GA playoffs when they were in it. Now in RL they lost 4 total games out of 70 something...

100%. its just the GA headbands trolling. facts matter. all 3 clubs ECNL promoted are really good clubs overall.

girls club rankings

ECNL:
Team Boca: #115
SC Surf: #107
Lonestar #50


GA:
Carolina Core # 512
Oklahoma Celtic # 410
Kansas City Legends: #190

On paper ECNL added the higher-ranked clubs right now. But GA’s move seems pretty clearly about the future, not just current rankings. Carolina Core, Oklahoma Celtic, and KC Legends all sit in strategic markets where there’s real room to grow, and they have the kind of leadership and infrastructure that could eventually challenge ECNL clubs locally.

So yes, ECNL added three very good clubs today. But GA’s additions look like long-term market plays with upside. Different strategies, not necessarily a win/lose situation.

this comment shows you clearly don't know anything about the clubs. the paper rankings the poster posted are pretty accurate. it's just a fact. those are very weak clubs and the 3 ECNL clubs are very strong and will get stronger now in the ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SC surf was below average in GA. But now ECNL hats will say they’re awesome.

So ECNL is taking GA lower tier clubs again? Just like SSS Ukies (they proved to be quite a turd) etc. On top of that ECNL is diluting their brand by bringing up all kinds of questionable RL clubs.

Not a good showing do far this season. But Im sure the ECNL hats will try to spin it into something its not.

Maybe do some research before talking nonsense. SC Surf had all but 1 make GA playoffs when they were in it. Now in RL they lost 4 total games out of 70 something...

100%. its just the GA headbands trolling. facts matter. all 3 clubs ECNL promoted are really good clubs overall.

girls club rankings

ECNL:
Team Boca: #115
SC Surf: #107
Lonestar #50


GA:
Carolina Core # 512
Oklahoma Celtic # 410
Kansas City Legends: #190

On paper ECNL added the higher-ranked clubs right now. But GA’s move seems pretty clearly about the future, not just current rankings. Carolina Core, Oklahoma Celtic, and KC Legends all sit in strategic markets where there’s real room to grow, and they have the kind of leadership and infrastructure that could eventually challenge ECNL clubs locally.

So yes, ECNL added three very good clubs today. But GA’s additions look like long-term market plays with upside. Different strategies, not necessarily a win/lose situation.

this comment shows you clearly don't know anything about the clubs. the paper rankings the poster posted are pretty accurate. it's just a fact. those are very weak clubs and the 3 ECNL clubs are very strong and will get stronger now in the ECNL.

The homer is easy to detect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SC surf was below average in GA. But now ECNL hats will say they’re awesome.

So ECNL is taking GA lower tier clubs again? Just like SSS Ukies (they proved to be quite a turd) etc. On top of that ECNL is diluting their brand by bringing up all kinds of questionable RL clubs.

Not a good showing do far this season. But Im sure the ECNL hats will try to spin it into something its not.

Maybe do some research before talking nonsense. SC Surf had all but 1 make GA playoffs when they were in it. Now in RL they lost 4 total games out of 70 something...

100%. its just the GA headbands trolling. facts matter. all 3 clubs ECNL promoted are really good clubs overall.

girls club rankings

ECNL:
Team Boca: #115
SC Surf: #107
Lonestar #50


GA:
Carolina Core # 512
Oklahoma Celtic # 410
Kansas City Legends: #190

On paper ECNL added the higher-ranked clubs right now. But GA’s move seems pretty clearly about the future, not just current rankings. Carolina Core, Oklahoma Celtic, and KC Legends all sit in strategic markets where there’s real room to grow, and they have the kind of leadership and infrastructure that could eventually challenge ECNL clubs locally.

So yes, ECNL added three very good clubs today. But GA’s additions look like long-term market plays with upside. Different strategies, not necessarily a win/lose situation.

this comment shows you clearly don't know anything about the clubs. the paper rankings the poster posted are pretty accurate. it's just a fact. those are very weak clubs and the 3 ECNL clubs are very strong and will get stronger now in the ECNL.

The homer is easy to detect.

Well, he is wearing an ECNL hat.

Go League!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SC surf was below average in GA. But now ECNL hats will say they’re awesome.

So ECNL is taking GA lower tier clubs again? Just like SSS Ukies (they proved to be quite a turd) etc. On top of that ECNL is diluting their brand by bringing up all kinds of questionable RL clubs.

Not a good showing do far this season. But Im sure the ECNL hats will try to spin it into something its not.

Maybe do some research before talking nonsense. SC Surf had all but 1 make GA playoffs when they were in it. Now in RL they lost 4 total games out of 70 something...

100%. its just the GA headbands trolling. facts matter. all 3 clubs ECNL promoted are really good clubs overall.

girls club rankings

ECNL:
Team Boca: #115
SC Surf: #107
Lonestar #50


GA:
Carolina Core # 512
Oklahoma Celtic # 410
Kansas City Legends: #190

On paper ECNL added the higher-ranked clubs right now. But GA’s move seems pretty clearly about the future, not just current rankings. Carolina Core, Oklahoma Celtic, and KC Legends all sit in strategic markets where there’s real room to grow, and they have the kind of leadership and infrastructure that could eventually challenge ECNL clubs locally.

So yes, ECNL added three very good clubs today. But GA’s additions look like long-term market plays with upside. Different strategies, not necessarily a win/lose situation.

this comment shows you clearly don't know anything about the clubs. the paper rankings the poster posted are pretty accurate. it's just a fact. those are very weak clubs and the 3 ECNL clubs are very strong and will get stronger now in the ECNL.

This comment shows you have problems with reading comprehension. Read what a posted again.