The DNC is a joke

[Anonymous]

Anyone aware that the dems have a debate tomorrow night?

DWS is a fraud. To bury these debates to maximize little viewership and interest is absurd. This is some stupid version of saving your "best" player for the playoffs by protecting her from prime time and possibly looking silly.

Dems dont need to have 900 debates like the GOP. At least have them on during the week so people can watch and see what the party offers thats different than the other side.

If this nonsense was done in 2008, Obama probably would have never gotten the nomination since nobody would see him perform in debates. Much like Bernie, all the momentum Obama would have built would have died by the lack of debates and do nothing by the DNC.

Shameful.

[Anonymous]

Bernie's not going to win, bro.

[Anonymous]

What's the point of a Dem debate? Hilary had it locked up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bernie's not going to win, bro.

I dont think he will. Yes, I despise Clinton and I am not a Bernie fan boy. I would prefer he scare her a bit and the party is doing their best to prevent that. Thats what I find annoying.

I believe he would scare the hell out of her if there were more debates or debates during times people actually watch. Scare her in a few primaries and eventually get blown out is how I imagine it would play out.

[Anonymous]

I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.

Me, too. The DNC reaction is simply more evidence that they are doing everything they can to ensure HRC gets the nomination.
I wonder if Debbie Wasserman Schulz has an “in” with the FBI to ensure that no charges will be brought against their preferred candidate????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.

I thought that's what it was about too, but honestly it feels like a ploy to discredit Sanders because he scares them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone aware that the dems have a debate tomorrow night?

DWS is a fraud. To bury these debates to maximize little viewership and interest is absurd. This is some stupid version of saving your "best" player for the playoffs by protecting her from prime time and possibly looking silly.

Dems dont need to have 900 debates like the GOP. At least have them on during the week so people can watch and see what the party offers thats different than the other side.

If this nonsense was done in 2008, Obama probably would have never gotten the nomination since nobody would see him perform in debates. Much like Bernie, all the momentum Obama would have built would have died by the lack of debates and do nothing by the DNC.

Shameful.

I don't think the DNC is a joke, but I see your point. I thing Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been in the Hillary camp for a while and doesn't want her chances challenged. So far, the debates have done nothing but bolster Hillary's candidacy, so I don't see the harm in having more of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bernie's not going to win, bro.

I dont think he will. Yes, I despise Clinton and I am not a Bernie fan boy. I would prefer he scare her a bit and the party is doing their best to prevent that. Thats what I find annoying.

I believe he would scare the hell out of her if there were more debates or debates during times people actually watch. Scare her in a few primaries and eventually get blown out is how I imagine it would play out.

If the objective is for Bernie to scare Hillary and eventually gain the nomination, fair enough. But then what? You have a candidate on the democratic ticket for the general election that the majority of the voting populace has been led to believe (rightly or wrongly) is a socialist who will take America away from it's capitalist principals. Too risky if, like me, the idea of another Republican in the White House with the potential to dramatically re-shape the construct of the Supreme Court, as well as undue the progress of the last eight years, is really scary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.

I thought that's what it was about too, but honestly it feels like a ploy to discredit Sanders because he scares them.

It's all a conspiracy. When Bernie says he won't run negative ads but then runs negative ads, it's a conspiracy. When Bernie says he won't accept super pac support but does accept super pac support, it's a conspiracy. When Bernie's campaign violates voters' privacy by accessing confidential data with four different user accounts, it's a conspiracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.

I thought that's what it was about too, but honestly it feels like a ploy to discredit Sanders because he scares them.

It's all a conspiracy. When Bernie says he won't run negative ads but then runs negative ads, it's a conspiracy. When Bernie says he won't accept super pac support but does accept super pac support, it's a conspiracy. When Bernie's campaign violates voters' privacy by accessing confidential data with four different user accounts, it's a conspiracy.

No you're right. I didn't mean to make it sound like he's some victim of the HRC machine. I don't think he is. He's a politician, just like she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bernie's not going to win, bro.

I dont think he will. Yes, I despise Clinton and I am not a Bernie fan boy. I would prefer he scare her a bit and the party is doing their best to prevent that. Thats what I find annoying.

I believe he would scare the hell out of her if there were more debates or debates during times people actually watch. Scare her in a few primaries and eventually get blown out is how I imagine it would play out.

Well Sanders just got busted for downloading her private voter data today, which I am sure scared her. So there is that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bernie's not going to win, bro.

I dont think he will. Yes, I despise Clinton and I am not a Bernie fan boy. I would prefer he scare her a bit and the party is doing their best to prevent that. Thats what I find annoying.

I believe he would scare the hell out of her if there were more debates or debates during times people actually watch. Scare her in a few primaries and eventually get blown out is how I imagine it would play out.

Assuming you're a Democrat, I'm struggling to understand why you would want to see the standard-bearer "scared." Especially since there's no one in either party who can actually challenge her for the office? I mean, if there was viable opposition, great. But there isn't, so... What's the point of dragging her down?

[Anonymous]

Man I wish Mark Warner would run.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.

I thought that's what it was about too, but honestly it feels like a ploy to discredit Sanders because he scares them.

It's all a conspiracy. When Bernie says he won't run negative ads but then runs negative ads, it's a conspiracy. When Bernie says he won't accept super pac support but does accept super pac support, it's a conspiracy. When Bernie's campaign violates voters' privacy by accessing confidential data with four different user accounts, it's a conspiracy.

No you're right. I didn't mean to make it sound like he's some victim of the HRC machine. I don't think he is. He's a politician, just like she is.

I agree with you that he's a politician just like she is, but some Sanders supporters have their tinfoil hats on.

It's not a small thing when the campaign of a leading privacy advocate deliberately accesses confidential voter data that belongs to a rival campaign.