VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Folks may want to think twice when talking about a lady who does porn and using DP in their posts!!

[Anonymous]

This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had sex with her husband and post the video online. Lauren Boebert was in a public theater fondling her date’s genitals and he was groping her breast, children were present. Both of these are sex acts.

Only one of these was for done for money. Fornicating is which different from fondling someone over their clothes and you know it. As much as I can’t stand Boebert, she didn’t take her clothes off and have her date penetrate her doggy style in the butt in the theater while people threw money at her, which is essentially what Gibson did.

There were children in that theater. There were not (or shouldn't be anyway) children watching Chaturbate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Actually I see a very pathetic person selling to complete strangers the opportunity to watch her have sex. This is not normal behavior. If she has so little regard for herself why should I?
I also think she’s probably mentally ill and really should take a time out to get help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Jesus Christ, is the bar so low now that people who don’t want their elected officials having sex online for money are “prudes”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had sex with her husband and post the video online. Lauren Boebert was in a public theater fondling her date’s genitals and he was groping her breast, children were present. Both of these are sex acts.

Only one of these was for done for money. Fornicating is which different from fondling someone over their clothes and you know it. As much as I can’t stand Boebert, she didn’t take her clothes off and have her date penetrate her doggy style in the butt in the theater while people threw money at her, which is essentially what Gibson did.

LOL. Fornicating? You sound like an old church lady from the 80s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had sex with her husband and post the video online. Lauren Boebert was in a public theater fondling her date’s genitals and he was groping her breast, children were present. Both of these are sex acts.

Only one of these was for done for money. Fornicating is which different from fondling someone over their clothes and you know it. As much as I can’t stand Boebert, she didn’t take her clothes off and have her date penetrate her doggy style in the butt in the theater while people threw money at her, which is essentially what Gibson did.

Only one of them was intentionally performing sexual acts in front of children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had sex with her husband and post the video online. Lauren Boebert was in a public theater fondling her date’s genitals and he was groping her breast, children were present. Both of these are sex acts.

Only one of these was for done for money. Fornicating is which different from fondling someone over their clothes and you know it. As much as I can’t stand Boebert, she didn’t take her clothes off and have her date penetrate her doggy style in the butt in the theater while people threw money at her, which is essentially what Gibson did.

LOL. Fornicating? You sound like an old church lady from the 80s.

I can use the other f word instead. make you feel better?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had sex with her husband and post the video online. Lauren Boebert was in a public theater fondling her date’s genitals and he was groping her breast, children were present. Both of these are sex acts.

Only one of these was for done for money. Fornicating is which different from fondling someone over their clothes and you know it. As much as I can’t stand Boebert, she didn’t take her clothes off and have her date penetrate her doggy style in the butt in the theater while people threw money at her, which is essentially what Gibson did.

Only one of them was intentionally performing sexual acts in front of children.

Gibson and Grandma Boebert could just have their own OnlyFans account. America 2023, yay

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had sex with her husband and post the video online. Lauren Boebert was in a public theater fondling her date’s genitals and he was groping her breast, children were present. Both of these are sex acts.

Only one of these was for done for money. Fornicating is which different from fondling someone over their clothes and you know it. As much as I can’t stand Boebert, she didn’t take her clothes off and have her date penetrate her doggy style in the butt in the theater while people threw money at her, which is essentially what Gibson did.

There were children in that theater. There were not (or shouldn't be anyway) children watching Chaturbate.

You think kids don’t get access to porn?! Sure. Denial is a hell of a drug.

[Anonymous]

Word is that with her campaign donations drying up, she’s now offering a free DVD with every contribution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the abortion issues pivotal to voters. Not sure people care about a politicians personal life when abortion is on the table.

Correct. Abortion and gun control.

Speak for yourself. My primary issue for this election is the border.
DP

Since this is a race for state delegate, do you mean the border with North Carolina or the border with Maryland?

DP
With Biden, every state is a border state.
Reasonable people who are fed up with the crisis at the southern border are carefully choosing who to vote for in their state and local elections because the burden is now on states on how to deal with increasing migrants in their states. You would know this if you paid attention to what is happening in NY and Massachusetts.

Chicago too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Why does this make you want to barf?
Is it so inconceivable that an OB might just be pro-life? Do you find it repulsive that an OB might not want to kill the unborn?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Jesus Christ, is the bar so low now that people who don’t want their elected officials having sex online for money are “prudes”?

Actually, I really wouldn’t care if the person also had the credentials to govern. But I would much prefer a candidate disclose up front because I know there are so many people who would disagree.

Outside of prudishness, what is so terrible about sex? I feel grosser seeing the Trump sons displaying animals they killed for fun. You can like kinky sex and be well educated and smart. You can be a sex worker and be a lawyer. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

But I also know there are lots of people who are yucked out by it. She didn’t show good judgment, but doing what she did doesn’t make her immoral or gross or even unqualified. Her poor judgment may make her unqualified.