Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry have been voted the most respected royals by young people after the Queen.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/celebrities/news/a36737454/meghan-harry-most-respected-royals/

The same Harper’s Bazaar that Sussex mouthpiece Omid Scobie works at? LOL!

Are you dull? The poll was conducted by an external organization and was reported in multiple papers, not just Harper's Bazaar.

And the fact that you'd dismiss a publication like Harper's Bazaar while no doubt clutching to your tabloid papers as gospel truth speaks volumes.

DP - but good for them. Now maybe they'll shut up about how the press is so unfair to them because they're racist.

Again, the org that conducted the survey wasn't a publication (or part of "the press") -- they are an external, third-party consultancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry have been voted the most respected royals by young people after the Queen.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/celebrities/news/a36737454/meghan-harry-most-respected-royals/

The same Harper’s Bazaar that Sussex mouthpiece Omid Scobie works at? LOL!

Are you dull? The poll was conducted by an external organization and was reported in multiple papers, not just Harper's Bazaar.

And the fact that you'd dismiss a publication like Harper's Bazaar while no doubt clutching to your tabloid papers as gospel truth speaks volumes.

DP - but good for them. Now maybe they'll shut up about how the press is so unfair to them because they're racist.

Again, the org that conducted the survey wasn't a publication (or part of "the press") -- they are an external, third-party consultancy.

So?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry have been voted the most respected royals by young people after the Queen.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/celebrities/news/a36737454/meghan-harry-most-respected-royals/

The same Harper’s Bazaar that Sussex mouthpiece Omid Scobie works at? LOL!

Are you dull? The poll was conducted by an external organization and was reported in multiple papers, not just Harper's Bazaar.

And the fact that you'd dismiss a publication like Harper's Bazaar while no doubt clutching to your tabloid papers as gospel truth speaks volumes.

How is Harper’s any different?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry have been voted the most respected royals by young people after the Queen.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/celebrities/news/a36737454/meghan-harry-most-respected-royals/

The same Harper’s Bazaar that Sussex mouthpiece Omid Scobie works at? LOL!

Are you dull? The poll was conducted by an external organization and was reported in multiple papers, not just Harper's Bazaar.

And the fact that you'd dismiss a publication like Harper's Bazaar while no doubt clutching to your tabloid papers as gospel truth speaks volumes.

How is Harper’s any different?

Are you really ignorant of the difference between a pub like Harper's Bazaar and tabloids like The Sun and Daily Mirror?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry have been voted the most respected royals by young people after the Queen.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/celebrities/news/a36737454/meghan-harry-most-respected-royals/

The same Harper’s Bazaar that Sussex mouthpiece Omid Scobie works at? LOL!

Are you dull? The poll was conducted by an external organization and was reported in multiple papers, not just Harper's Bazaar.

And the fact that you'd dismiss a publication like Harper's Bazaar while no doubt clutching to your tabloid papers as gospel truth speaks volumes.

DP - but good for them. Now maybe they'll shut up about how the press is so unfair to them because they're racist.

Again, the org that conducted the survey wasn't a publication (or part of "the press") -- they are an external, third-party consultancy.

So?

DP. Are you just trying to spam the thread at this point? Your whole argument was centered around the press.

[Anonymous]

Why wouldn’t Charles have changed the letters patent with respect to Harry’s children not automatically becoming prince/princess upon his ascension to the throne prior to him getting married? He had decades to do this if it truly is motivated by having a slimmer monarchy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry have been voted the most respected royals by young people after the Queen.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/celebrities/news/a36737454/meghan-harry-most-respected-royals/

The same Harper’s Bazaar that Sussex mouthpiece Omid Scobie works at? LOL!

Are you dull? The poll was conducted by an external organization and was reported in multiple papers, not just Harper's Bazaar.

And the fact that you'd dismiss a publication like Harper's Bazaar while no doubt clutching to your tabloid papers as gospel truth speaks volumes.

How is Harper’s any different?

Are you really ignorant of the difference between a pub like Harper's Bazaar and tabloids like The Sun and Daily Mirror?

Enlighten us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry have been voted the most respected royals by young people after the Queen.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/celebrities/news/a36737454/meghan-harry-most-respected-royals/

The same Harper’s Bazaar that Sussex mouthpiece Omid Scobie works at? LOL!

Are you dull? The poll was conducted by an external organization and was reported in multiple papers, not just Harper's Bazaar.

And the fact that you'd dismiss a publication like Harper's Bazaar while no doubt clutching to your tabloid papers as gospel truth speaks volumes.

How is Harper’s any different?

Are you really ignorant of the difference between a pub like Harper's Bazaar and tabloids like The Sun and Daily Mirror?

One has Omid Scobie and the others don’t?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t Charles have changed the letters patent with respect to Harry’s children not automatically becoming prince/princess upon his ascension to the throne prior to him getting married? He had decades to do this if it truly is motivated by having a slimmer monarchy.

Because he’s not the King yet. Letters Patent comes from the reigning monarch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t Charles have changed the letters patent with respect to Harry’s children not automatically becoming prince/princess upon his ascension to the throne prior to him getting married? He had decades to do this if it truly is motivated by having a slimmer monarchy.

Prince Charles is giving them what they wanted which was out of the royal family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t Charles have changed the letters patent with respect to Harry’s children not automatically becoming prince/princess upon his ascension to the throne prior to him getting married? He had decades to do this if it truly is motivated by having a slimmer monarchy.

Because he’s not the King yet. Letters Patent comes from the reigning monarch.

I don't understand why the Sussexes suck up to the Queen but ultimately they will need to face Charles and William when she dies. They will have power and the Sussexes have pissed them both off, how is this a good long term strategy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And on the clock, she comes out just in time to try to take away from the news of Kate's tremendous Early Years report.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a36762356/meghan-markle-maternity-leave-statement/

She just can't help herself!

Maternity leave? From what?

Lol and "breaking her silence" from maternity leave in order to applaud herself?? Okay then.

[Anonymous]

Why does she refer to herself as the the Duchess of Sussex if she so desperately wanted to get away from the royal family?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t Charles have changed the letters patent with respect to Harry’s children not automatically becoming prince/princess upon his ascension to the throne prior to him getting married? He had decades to do this if it truly is motivated by having a slimmer monarchy.

Because only the monarch can do that and QEII is not willing to. The fact Charles is doing this just to Harry is pretty cruel imo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t Charles have changed the letters patent with respect to Harry’s children not automatically becoming prince/princess upon his ascension to the throne prior to him getting married? He had decades to do this if it truly is motivated by having a slimmer monarchy.

Because he’s not the King yet. Letters Patent comes from the reigning monarch.

I don't understand why the Sussexes suck up to the Queen but ultimately they will need to face Charles and William when she dies. They will have power and the Sussexes have pissed them both off, how is this a good long term strategy?

Because by the time Queen dies they will have already secured everything they need themselves. You see Beatrice and Eugenie rushing out to buy homes now? Its because Andrew got money from mommy to help them.

But for H&M and its more than just money. It was partial protection in Canada, it was access to royal offices and drivers and homes once in the UK, it was diplomatic protocols activated on their behalf. All of that stops with William definitely, I don't know about Charles. But PWT has done his best to make his brother's married life hell - fortunately he only controls Kensington Palace.

Now imagine if William was in control of all of the U.K.?