Hilaria Baldwin - At it again

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it terrible that I did not know who she was until DCUM? And I am struck by how good looking she is?

The somatic narcissist is obsessed with looks. If you think Hilarious is so "good looking" to each their own. She's cute, she's not gorgeous, beautiful, etc. Giselle, Elle McPherson, etc. are strikingly good looking. These weird "Hilarious is so GORGEOUS" posts are weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She needs an extremely good publicist who can take her out of this nightmare and parlay this into a reality TV career.

This is nothing compared to Kim's Sex Tape. Small potatoes. But these two - Hillary and Alec - need to be managed well.

And yes, as the curious public, I want to know her neuroses that led her to create an alternate identity. I am absolutely riveted. I would pay to see this on pay per view. I want to see her take on this and want to see how she is explaining the unexplainable.

It's really fascinating how much the public think a 'reality TV career' is a super big thing. Nope.

Reality TV would downgrade Alec to laughing stock, and that is why he has prob never let the how you say thirsty for attention in English? wife never do it.

She had such a tiny "career" before this, we are not talking about Julia Roberts here. She'll go back to shilling no name brands like Waxelene, or whatever vacuum she never uses because five nannies, and Alec will be fine. Remember, Alec has acted like an idiot many, many times. His wife as a grifter is just another saga. No biggie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice People magazine online said zero. I am sure if This was say a Melania it would be front cover. The liberal bias is continuing to be troubles

That's not liberal bias. Alec isn't a liberal, he is an actor. He has little to no influence on politics. The issue is that he is very powerful in Hollywood and he's like the good ol boys of Hollywood- attack him and his powerful posse will blackball you.

Don't think he's a conservative!

lol at "Alec is very powerful in Hollywood."

He owns nothing in Hollywood, i,e, has no studio he owns, no tv network he owns, no award winning profitable show or film he owns. He's talent. Not to say that doesn't have some pull and relationships, but at the end of the day it's based on performance and he's a good actor, does the job, etc. He's not "very powerful in Hollywood." Connected, for sure. But, there's no loyalty at Best Buy for the appliances, so to speak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice People magazine online said zero. I am sure if This was say a Melania it would be front cover. The liberal bias is continuing to be troubles

That's not liberal bias. Alec isn't a liberal, he is an actor. He has little to no influence on politics. The issue is that he is very powerful in Hollywood and he's like the good ol boys of Hollywood- attack him and his powerful posse will blackball you.

Don't think he's a conservative!

lol at "Alec is very powerful in Hollywood."

He owns nothing in Hollywood, i,e, has no studio he owns, no tv network he owns, no award winning profitable show or film he owns. He's talent. Not to say that doesn't have some pull and relationships, but at the end of the day it's based on performance and he's a good actor, does the job, etc. He's not "very powerful in Hollywood." Connected, for sure. But, there's no loyalty at Best Buy for the appliances, so to speak.

I think the most power he has in Hollywood is that he plays trump on SNL, so maybe they’ll refrain from joking about it. However he is personally terrifying and he has a large platform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice People magazine online said zero. I am sure if This was say a Melania it would be front cover. The liberal bias is continuing to be troubles

Oh yes. So predictable. And of course, SNL won’t touch this. It would destroy their liberal bonafides.

Didn’t they run a piece early on saying why this whole deal was harmful to immigrants? One of the only articles AB responded to on Twitter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice People magazine online said zero. I am sure if This was say a Melania it would be front cover. The liberal bias is continuing to be troubles

Oh yes. So predictable. And of course, SNL won’t touch this. It would destroy their liberal bonafides.

Didn’t they run a piece early on saying why this whole deal was harmful to immigrants? One of the only articles AB responded to on Twitter?

People magazine ran two pieces on it, including the article mentioned above on why it’s offensive to immigrants. Alec Baldwin actually trashed the people writer of the latter on Twitter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice People magazine online said zero. I am sure if This was say a Melania it would be front cover. The liberal bias is continuing to be troubles

That's not liberal bias. Alec isn't a liberal, he is an actor. He has little to no influence on politics. The issue is that he is very powerful in Hollywood and he's like the good ol boys of Hollywood- attack him and his powerful posse will blackball you.

Don't think he's a conservative!

lol at "Alec is very powerful in Hollywood."

He owns nothing in Hollywood, i,e, has no studio he owns, no tv network he owns, no award winning profitable show or film he owns. He's talent. Not to say that doesn't have some pull and relationships, but at the end of the day it's based on performance and he's a good actor, does the job, etc. He's not "very powerful in Hollywood." Connected, for sure. But, there's no loyalty at Best Buy for the appliances, so to speak.

I think the most power he has in Hollywood is that he plays trump on SNL, so maybe they’ll refrain from joking about it. However he is personally terrifying and he has a large platform.

He's incredibly talented, attractive, etc. Unfortunate for the issues, though even more so that this recent situation was not his fault or doing. However, his "large platform" is social media, hardly "powerful" in anywhere. He's not a standalone success, truly, and while that isn't bad, to imply he has this enormous clout because OMG social media followers puts him at the level of several thousand non stars, non talent, nobodies. He isn't that, but his bread isn't buttered by his "platform."

Truly, he'll be fine because he makes people money on the platforms that generate far more than posts about Waxelene and dust busters. and he's old, old school. If he wasn't taken down calling his child a pig or beating up people, his wife being a grifter isn't going to do it to him.

[Anonymous]

Leave it to the NYT to sugarcoat this and rationalize this bizarre human being. Anti-Trumpers must stick together. Alec is a friend of ours. See you at the next party in the Hamptons. Never mind with wearing a mask. Anderson Cooper is already devising a strategy to pull you two out of this pathetic story of perpetuating a fraud. Twenty-five years ago, before he sold out to the Hamptons and Hollywood, The Howard Stern Show would’ve made great entertainment out of this for weeks to come. Today, Howie won’t touch this story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice People magazine online said zero. I am sure if This was say a Melania it would be front cover. The liberal bias is continuing to be troubles

That's not liberal bias. Alec isn't a liberal, he is an actor. He has little to no influence on politics. The issue is that he is very powerful in Hollywood and he's like the good ol boys of Hollywood- attack him and his powerful posse will blackball you.

Don't think he's a conservative!

lol at "Alec is very powerful in Hollywood."

He owns nothing in Hollywood, i,e, has no studio he owns, no tv network he owns, no award winning profitable show or film he owns. He's talent. Not to say that doesn't have some pull and relationships, but at the end of the day it's based on performance and he's a good actor, does the job, etc. He's not "very powerful in Hollywood." Connected, for sure. But, there's no loyalty at Best Buy for the appliances, so to speak.

I think the most power he has in Hollywood is that he plays trump on SNL, so maybe they’ll refrain from joking about it. However he is personally terrifying and he has a large platform.

As if this could make any actor "powerful."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's brand-new papparazzi photos of H walking with the kids *and* two nannies. It's kind of gratifying to finally see in photos the nannies that I always knew were there. (Of course, it's also gross that there are photogs planted outside their home, but you reap what you sow, I guess.)

Hilaria is like walk ten steps behind me at all times so when they take my picture, I can pretend like I am doing this alone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's brand-new papparazzi photos of H walking with the kids *and* two nannies. It's kind of gratifying to finally see in photos the nannies that I always knew were there. (Of course, it's also gross that there are photogs planted outside their home, but you reap what you sow, I guess.)

Hilaria is like walk ten steps behind me at all times so when they take my picture, I can pretend like I am doing this alone.

There are no "photogs" driving hour+ to get a picture. It's probably some random who saw them and took photo, made a few bucks.

Photos of these two at best drive a few hundred bucks. Even when celebs try to sell their own photos to media it isn't for gazillions. Like anyone is going to do for these two. Just simple business and facts.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it terrible that I did not know who she was until DCUM? And I am struck by how good looking she is?

I didn’t know before this thread either. And yes, she is maddeningly pretty and fit.

Find out who her plastic surgeon is and you can look like her. Look at old pictures-still pretty, but nothing like post-work.

[Anonymous]

Did you all see that post where she has not 1 but 2 portraits of herself in their Hampton’s home? One being her first “paparazzi” pic? She’s SO vapid. Lordy!