Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.

All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm.
There is zero reason for Meghan to be there.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html

There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions

1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing
2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising

Huh? The title of the article says Meghan is not going.

Well, in something I find ENTIRELY unsurprising the ENTIRE CONTENTS of that article has changed since I read it an hour ago. Because whatever they published was corrected almost immediately because they made it up.

No joke, an hour ago that article said those two things.

I don't think they made the story up. I think this was a trial balloon to see if the public would be onboard with it. They took a look at the massive number of negative comments and noped out.

A) Everything related H&M on the Daily Fail has been negative since 2017.

B) They are the only members of the royal family that consistently receive 5,000 - 10,000 comments on every single article.

So no. It was clearly the DF running with an unsourced rumor, as they've been known to do, and it was corrected quickly. Just not before they had it up for an hour or so.

Really - who thinks a mother is going to leave her three-week-old NEWBORN behind across an ocean and a 15-hour flight away for any reason? Let alone a statue unveiling that will take multiple days. That's the kind of idiocy the Daily Fail is running with.

Right, she would take the newborn with her duh! highjack the statue event for herself and baby - it's obvious at this point how she operates. But once again she is a coward.

Make up your mind - she's going and she's going to steal the attention off every royal family member - born and married in. Or she's not going and she's a coward for not crossing the ocean with a newborn.

You sound like you don't want her to go, but you also want her to go? Which is it?

This is one of those situations where she can test the waters. If she goes she will be ridiculed as a bad mother for leaving her newborn. If she does not go she has an excuse - newborn but Harry getting free of her and having private talks with his family for a few days is not in her best interest so that leaves her in a pickle.

You didn't answer the question - what exactly do you want her to do? Is there anything that would make you happy?

Not interested in that - this is game theory mixed with soap opera. Interested in how it plays out and if Meghan will be true to form and play her usual tricks.

What tricks, Harry is going alone.

I think pp meant Meghan is pretty controlling as narcissist people are. The "tricks" refer to all the reasons she gave to get Harry away from his family, and leave the UK. She may feel insecure while Harry is in their midst. They may try to deprogram him from the Meghan cult.

She has good reason to LOL. Harry and Kate were chatting warmly at Philip’s funeral.

Looks like Meghan is being called a liar. "recollection may vary" in other words they are nicely disputing her claims:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1450666/Queen-news-prince-harry-meghan-markle-lilibet-queen-Elizabeth-II-response-royal-family

This is the same royal family who threatened ABC over the Jeffrey Epstein story all those years ago. I don’t put much stock in their understanding of truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.

All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm.
There is zero reason for Meghan to be there.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html

There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions

1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing
2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising

Huh? The title of the article says Meghan is not going.

Well, in something I find ENTIRELY unsurprising the ENTIRE CONTENTS of that article has changed since I read it an hour ago. Because whatever they published was corrected almost immediately because they made it up.

No joke, an hour ago that article said those two things.

I don't think they made the story up. I think this was a trial balloon to see if the public would be onboard with it. They took a look at the massive number of negative comments and noped out.

A) Everything related H&M on the Daily Fail has been negative since 2017.

B) They are the only members of the royal family that consistently receive 5,000 - 10,000 comments on every single article.

So no. It was clearly the DF running with an unsourced rumor, as they've been known to do, and it was corrected quickly. Just not before they had it up for an hour or so.

Really - who thinks a mother is going to leave her three-week-old NEWBORN behind across an ocean and a 15-hour flight away for any reason? Let alone a statue unveiling that will take multiple days. That's the kind of idiocy the Daily Fail is running with.

Right, she would take the newborn with her duh! highjack the statue event for herself and baby - it's obvious at this point how she operates. But once again she is a coward.

Make up your mind - she's going and she's going to steal the attention off every royal family member - born and married in. Or she's not going and she's a coward for not crossing the ocean with a newborn.

You sound like you don't want her to go, but you also want her to go? Which is it?

This is one of those situations where she can test the waters. If she goes she will be ridiculed as a bad mother for leaving her newborn. If she does not go she has an excuse - newborn but Harry getting free of her and having private talks with his family for a few days is not in her best interest so that leaves her in a pickle.

You didn't answer the question - what exactly do you want her to do? Is there anything that would make you happy?

Not interested in that - this is game theory mixed with soap opera. Interested in how it plays out and if Meghan will be true to form and play her usual tricks.

What tricks, Harry is going alone.

I think pp meant Meghan is pretty controlling as narcissist people are. The "tricks" refer to all the reasons she gave to get Harry away from his family, and leave the UK. She may feel insecure while Harry is in their midst. They may try to deprogram him from the Meghan cult.

She has good reason to LOL. Harry and Kate were chatting warmly at Philip’s funeral.

There was a weird gossip story suggesting Kate might not go by Camilla Tominey. Grain of salt but she does frequently have the Middleton talking points.

[Anonymous]

And on the clock, she comes out just in time to try to take away from the news of Kate's tremendous Early Years report.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a36762356/meghan-markle-maternity-leave-statement/

She just can't help herself!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And on the clock, she comes out just in time to try to take away from the news of Kate's tremendous Early Years report.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a36762356/meghan-markle-maternity-leave-statement/

She just can't help herself!

Is it Meghan’s fault Kate took four years to announce anything of substance for her Broken Britain project? No. You wait on her to do anything and a decade will pass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And on the clock, she comes out just in time to try to take away from the news of Kate's tremendous Early Years report.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a36762356/meghan-markle-maternity-leave-statement/

She just can't help herself!

This came out today? At the same times as Kate's announcement video?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And on the clock, she comes out just in time to try to take away from the news of Kate's tremendous Early Years report.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a36762356/meghan-markle-maternity-leave-statement/

She just can't help herself!

This came out today? At the same times as Kate's announcement video?

Nope, the PP didn't even read the article. It references the fact that Meghan made the #1 NYT Bestsellers list 3 days ago and made a statement then. Nothing to do with Kate because it surpasses her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And on the clock, she comes out just in time to try to take away from the news of Kate's tremendous Early Years report.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a36762356/meghan-markle-maternity-leave-statement/

She just can't help herself!

Don't you remember? They left the RF to get some much needed privacy! LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And on the clock, she comes out just in time to try to take away from the news of Kate's tremendous Early Years report.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a36762356/meghan-markle-maternity-leave-statement/

She just can't help herself!

Don't you remember? They left the RF to get some much needed privacy! LOL

That's not what they said, but nice try?

[Anonymous]

Boy does Meghan’s book suck! Why on earth are people even buying it! The only thing nice about it is the pictures, but don’t spend your cash. Just another opportunistic money maker that comes across as extremely shallow and ironic.

And when is the monarchy going to take away their titles? I hope soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Boy does Meghan’s book suck! Why on earth are people even buying it! The only thing nice about it is the pictures, but don’t spend your cash. Just another opportunistic money maker that comes across as extremely shallow and ironic.

And when is the monarchy going to take away their titles? I hope soon.

This has been beaten to death. The monarchy can’t take Harry’s hereditary titles away without Parliament who haven’t really made a move to do so. Additionally, that wouldn’t be a smart move in that it opens up a whole can of worms with respect to the numerous other, currently titled, disgraced lesser royals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And on the clock, she comes out just in time to try to take away from the news of Kate's tremendous Early Years report.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a36762356/meghan-markle-maternity-leave-statement/

She just can't help herself!

Is it Meghan’s fault Kate took four years to announce anything of substance for her Broken Britain project? No. You wait on her to do anything and a decade will pass.

She has been hyping this thing up for years. Just start it already. It doesn’t take two decades to get a campaign going. She could’ve become a pediatrician or a child psychologist in the time she’s been working on this. Like is she lazy or is she really incompetent? It makes no sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And on the clock, she comes out just in time to try to take away from the news of Kate's tremendous Early Years report.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a36762356/meghan-markle-maternity-leave-statement/

She just can't help herself!

Maternity leave? From what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.

All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm.
There is zero reason for Meghan to be there.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html

There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions

1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing
2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising

Huh? The title of the article says Meghan is not going.

Well, in something I find ENTIRELY unsurprising the ENTIRE CONTENTS of that article has changed since I read it an hour ago. Because whatever they published was corrected almost immediately because they made it up.

No joke, an hour ago that article said those two things.

I don't think they made the story up. I think this was a trial balloon to see if the public would be onboard with it. They took a look at the massive number of negative comments and noped out.

A) Everything related H&M on the Daily Fail has been negative since 2017.

B) They are the only members of the royal family that consistently receive 5,000 - 10,000 comments on every single article.

So no. It was clearly the DF running with an unsourced rumor, as they've been known to do, and it was corrected quickly. Just not before they had it up for an hour or so.

Really - who thinks a mother is going to leave her three-week-old NEWBORN behind across an ocean and a 15-hour flight away for any reason? Let alone a statue unveiling that will take multiple days. That's the kind of idiocy the Daily Fail is running with.

Right, she would take the newborn with her duh! highjack the statue event for herself and baby - it's obvious at this point how she operates. But once again she is a coward.

Make up your mind - she's going and she's going to steal the attention off every royal family member - born and married in. Or she's not going and she's a coward for not crossing the ocean with a newborn.

You sound like you don't want her to go, but you also want her to go? Which is it?

This is one of those situations where she can test the waters. If she goes she will be ridiculed as a bad mother for leaving her newborn. If she does not go she has an excuse - newborn but Harry getting free of her and having private talks with his family for a few days is not in her best interest so that leaves her in a pickle.

You didn't answer the question - what exactly do you want her to do? Is there anything that would make you happy?

Not interested in that - this is game theory mixed with soap opera. Interested in how it plays out and if Meghan will be true to form and play her usual tricks.

She just had a baby. I don't really believe there was any expectation of her going. What happens when their kids become older? Will Harry still be going alone, or with the kids? Will she attend because I don't think she's going to be comfortable after her big O interview. Did she not foresee the consequences of her interview with the RF?

Somehow I don't think Meghan gives a %^&$ although you seem to. She and Harry are living their lives. They walked away with their eyes wide open. Harry still wants to maintain some contact and relationship with his family as he should but puts his wife and children first as he should.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And on the clock, she comes out just in time to try to take away from the news of Kate's tremendous Early Years report.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a36762356/meghan-markle-maternity-leave-statement/

She just can't help herself!

Is it Meghan’s fault Kate took four years to announce anything of substance for her Broken Britain project? No. You wait on her to do anything and a decade will pass.

She has been hyping this thing up for years. Just start it already. It doesn’t take two decades to get a campaign going. She could’ve become a pediatrician or a child psychologist in the time she’s been working on this. Like is she lazy or is she really incompetent? It makes no sense.

The answer is written on the walls.

[Anonymous]

Meaghan will never be Queen. Kate does well to ignore. There is no competition.