UCLA now…Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First we have to get rid of all the maga idiots. There are more Americans than there are maga. There’s no reason our country, and the world, needs to be impacted by these fleas.

You realize Trump won the popular vote, right?

If "Did Not Vote" had been a presidential candidate, they would have beaten Donald Trump by 9.1 million votes, and they would have won 21 states, earning 265 electoral college votes to Trump's 175 and Harris's 98
https://www.environmentalvoter.org/updates/2024-was-landslidefor-did-not-vote

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
UCLA is rich enough. Hard working taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to make UCLA even more wealthy.

Wow the idiot has joined the chat

It’s a bribe you idiot that all taxpayer will pay and it will not go to pay the national debt it’s going to Trump directly dam fool

How is it going directly to Trump?

These monies are not tax revenues they are bribes
Hence when financial accounting is done where do you think the monies are deposited? Not the US treasury

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:UCLA lost in court before it settled. The chancellor testified he knew there was a "jew exclusion zone" on campus.

I am not denying that they are selectively enforcing but that isn't a legal defense.

You know what. This is a fair point. However, did the court also ask for $1B as part of that settlement. The point is that it is up to courts to settle civil suits. It is not within the rights of US Government, under the direction of a dictatorial president, to selectively cut funding and ask for extortion money to double down on a court case loss.

Also, why would an attack on antisemitism require changes to trans-gender policy and DEI usage in admissions? This has absolutely nothing to do with allowing protesters to restrict the access of Jewish people on campus.

Lastly, I agree with a PP who said that the colleges need to grow a pair and stand up to this BS. It may take a few years, but as a united group - I think they have a very strong case against the government. And that is even with this gerrymandered Supreme Court that the dictator set up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stand up America!!! Stand the fk up!

This is fascism.

Where are all the colleges? Only like 16 signed the amicus brief for Harvard.

So gross. Why aren’t they sticking together and protesting this corruption?

They are splintering. There are so many hiding, trying not to draw attention to themselves. This is how fascism is allowed to grow. It’s how the Nazi movement spread- p

+1. They are all trying to keep their head down to avoid being the next shakedown victim. It’s sad to see it come to this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
UCLA is rich enough. Hard working taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to make UCLA even more wealthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:F--- Trump.

UCLA is test blind anyway and since grading varies significantly across different schools, there is no "objective" criteria for them to evaluate. Everything is holistic or subjective.

It's all about the essays and EC list.

doubt the fed lawyers can make a clear case here since they don't take any AP, SAT or ACT tests and are TEST BLIND.

This part. It will make no sense for this to be litigated. It's always been subjective and there will be no "proof" or objective enough "data" that is being considered here. They recalculate all the GPAs and don't consider scores anyway. Really hard to build a case that someone should be admitted who wasn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:UCLA has been violating civil rights law.

Can you name the civil law violated? Serious question

DP

The civil rights act.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

It's just becoming tedious at this point how the administrator is steamrolling things and cultivating everything.

For the brief moment this may be up - none of what readers see is reflective of genuine conversation.

[Anonymous]

UCLA settled with several students, that is in the Frankel case which they lost a motion to defend on.
That case generated lots of evidence that Trump admn is using to extract unrelated concessions and $1B - UCLA has not agreed to that and I don't think will, that is a ridiculous number. However as with Brown, Columbia and Penn they probably have to settle with the government because they are super likely to lose on at least on the issue of violation of civil rights/equal protection of Jewish and Israeli students. Institutions generally don't go to trial on cases where they know they will lose which they pretty much know here as they get to pay all of the trial costs and then the judgement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stand up America!!! Stand the fk up!

This is fascism.

This is why all the schools need to band together. That's the way to win. He's picking them off one by one now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Frankel v UCLA-
UCLA allowed protestors to stop Jewish students from entering buildings/crossing parts of campus unless they verbally disclaimed Israel's right to exist. That is conduct, not speech, you get to shout hate but you don't get to block or limit other students access to campus. These offenders were subject to the school's code of conduct and should have been expelled or otherwise prevented (i.e. arrested if needed). Straight up discrimination on the basis of religion/national origin not speech and not protected

Actually, UCLA did not contest this even though the activists and participating faculty denied that this ever occurred. Not surprising, given the hostility of the Chancellor to the protests.

The funny thing is, by conceding, and paying out 6 million, UCLA is facing the prospect of paying 1 billion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First we have to get rid of all the maga idiots. There are more Americans than there are maga. There’s no reason our country, and the world, needs to be impacted by these fleas.

You realize Trump won the popular vote, right?

If "Did Not Vote" had been a presidential candidate, they would have beaten Donald Trump by 9.1 million votes, and they would have won 21 states, earning 265 electoral college votes to Trump's 175 and Harris's 98
https://www.environmentalvoter.org/updates/2024-was-landslidefor-did-not-vote

This election had the highest voter turnout in history.

Trump won the popular vote so the notion that everybody actually agrees with you is silly as phack.

Instead of denying reality perhaps you should consider why normal every day people would vote for someone like Trump and then take responsibility for your role in driving votes in his direction.

Repent and stop being an egotistical self righteous nimrod.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:F--- Trump.

UCLA is test blind anyway and since grading varies significantly across different schools, there is no "objective" criteria for them to evaluate. Everything is holistic or subjective.

It's all about the essays and EC list.

doubt the fed lawyers can make a clear case here since they don't take any AP, SAT or ACT tests and are TEST BLIND.

This part. It will make no sense for this to be litigated. It's always been subjective and there will be no "proof" or objective enough "data" that is being considered here. They recalculate all the GPAs and don't consider scores anyway. Really hard to build a case that someone should be admitted who wasn't.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:UCLA has been violating civil rights law.

Can you name the civil law violated? Serious question

DP.
A draft of a proposed agreement sent to the school Friday and obtained by CNN requires UCLA to pay the federal government $1 billion over multiple installments, along with a $172 million claims fund for people impacted by violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will anti-Zionist Jews and Arab students left defenseless by UCLA during a Zionist attack be allowed to submit claims to the anti-discrimination fund?

Exactly. Nearly 100.00% of the civil rights violations and actual crimes committed on the UCLA campus during the protests last year were committed by Zionist terrorists that descended on the campus with flare guns, illegal fireworks, and various weapons to attack and harm those protesting the genocide in Gaza and the UC system’s refusal to cooperate with the collective voice of its students.

It’s documented. It’s unequivocal. The civil rights violators and terrorists were Zionists. Full stop.

That "incident" was a bunch of Huntington Beach Proud Boy morons descending on UCLA.

Maybe get off social media for a minute and take a deep breathe. And maybe talk to some people in California.

You are the moron here. Read all about it. They were Zionists. Paid for by people like Bill Ackman, Debra Messing, Hessica Seinfeld, and others. Facts. Deal with it.