Timothee and Kylie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am completely convinced this is a PR relationship. She gains some legitimacy by being attached to a credible, talented actor and he gains some legitimacy as a hetero male by being attached to a voluptuous woman. Nothing else makes sense because they don’t even really seem that into each other.

Yeah I think so too. FWB who are using it for PR

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't get why people are so fascinated by this relationship. They are so low key there's barely anything going on, and yet as soon as they appear together, there are meltdowns.

I'm fascinated because I would think he'd have better taste than to date a famewhore Kardashian.

[Anonymous]

My theory is that he needed money during the actors strike so he negotiated a contract to get paid to "date" Kylie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My theory is that he needed money during the actors strike so he negotiated a contract to get paid to "date" Kylie.

+1. I think he spends more than he earns. He was reportedly only paid $2 mill for A Complete Unknown. So he either needs to do something like this, or shill products like Tom Holland. He had a contract with Chanel, but he's probably already blown through that money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am completely convinced this is a PR relationship. She gains some legitimacy by being attached to a credible, talented actor and he gains some legitimacy as a hetero male by being attached to a voluptuous woman. Nothing else makes sense because they don’t even really seem that into each other.

NP here: Agreed. If it was revealed he was gay, it would be devastating to his career. He's a heart throb to so many young women all over the globe, including lots of traditional conservative countries.

She's got a huge fan base online so I see this as a symbiotic, transactional PR relationship.

Here's my question: what does Kylie need legitimacy for? It's not like she's Kim and trying to get admitted to the bar or anything. Her mom created a makeup line for her and she poses sexily and accidentally got knocked up by someone who cheated on her with her "best" friend. Twice.

Her current income stream seems to be coming from selling products, so she needs to stay in the public eye, but she seems to not want to do that? Or at least do it in a way that is compelling on her own. Basically the only times I hear about her are in connection to her relationship.

I think he "dates" her because he wants to freedom to date around without it being seen. The relationship with Kylie is good cover for that, and he's willing to take the occasional PR hit to maintain this freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am completely convinced this is a PR relationship. She gains some legitimacy by being attached to a credible, talented actor and he gains some legitimacy as a hetero male by being attached to a voluptuous woman. Nothing else makes sense because they don’t even really seem that into each other.

NP here: Agreed. If it was revealed he was gay, it would be devastating to his career. He's a heart throb to so many young women all over the globe, including lots of traditional conservative countries.

She's got a huge fan base online so I see this as a symbiotic, transactional PR relationship.

Here's my question: what does Kylie need legitimacy for? It's not like she's Kim and trying to get admitted to the bar or anything. Her mom created a makeup line for her and she poses sexily and accidentally got knocked up by someone who cheated on her with her "best" friend. Twice.

I imagine her momager has future plans for her that entail her being more of a businesswoman and less of a surgically enhanced reality star. You would think heading up a successful beauty brand would be enough for someone her age, but as we all know, this family is greedy as hell and wants their hands in every possible industry that they can profit from.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am completely convinced this is a PR relationship. She gains some legitimacy by being attached to a credible, talented actor and he gains some legitimacy as a hetero male by being attached to a voluptuous woman. Nothing else makes sense because they don’t even really seem that into each other.

NP here: Agreed. If it was revealed he was gay, it would be devastating to his career. He's a heart throb to so many young women all over the globe, including lots of traditional conservative countries.

She's got a huge fan base online so I see this as a symbiotic, transactional PR relationship.

Here's my question: what does Kylie need legitimacy for? It's not like she's Kim and trying to get admitted to the bar or anything. Her mom created a makeup line for her and she poses sexily and accidentally got knocked up by someone who cheated on her with her "best" friend. Twice.

I imagine her momager has future plans for her that entail her being more of a businesswoman and less of a surgically enhanced reality star. You would think heading up a successful beauty brand would be enough for someone her age, but as we all know, this family is greedy as hell and wants their hands in every possible industry that they can profit from.

What successful beauty brand does she head? I've never heard of anyone using a Kylie product recently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am completely convinced this is a PR relationship. She gains some legitimacy by being attached to a credible, talented actor and he gains some legitimacy as a hetero male by being attached to a voluptuous woman. Nothing else makes sense because they don’t even really seem that into each other.

NP here: Agreed. If it was revealed he was gay, it would be devastating to his career. He's a heart throb to so many young women all over the globe, including lots of traditional conservative countries.

She's got a huge fan base online so I see this as a symbiotic, transactional PR relationship.

Here's my question: what does Kylie need legitimacy for? It's not like she's Kim and trying to get admitted to the bar or anything. Her mom created a makeup line for her and she poses sexily and accidentally got knocked up by someone who cheated on her with her "best" friend. Twice.

I imagine her momager has future plans for her that entail her being more of a businesswoman and less of a surgically enhanced reality star. You would think heading up a successful beauty brand would be enough for someone her age, but as we all know, this family is greedy as hell and wants their hands in every possible industry that they can profit from.

Strategic moves because it's not good business to rely solely on physical appearance preferences and reality TV in a fickle world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is physically terrible looking. She looked really pretty at the Golden Globes.

Agree he’s terrible looking. And that awful mustache that’s in style only makes it worse.

Name someone who you think isn’t terrible looking.

Tom Holland, Jamie Dornan, Pedro Pascal, Andrew Garfield, Channing Tatum, Penn Badgley.

Somehow I knew Channing Tatum would be on this list. He looks like a potato, wtf

Exactly, a white potato. Him, Travis Kelce, that guy from Guardians of the Galaxy married to the Schwarzenegger daughter… most actors are interchangeable and Chalamet stands out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am completely convinced this is a PR relationship. She gains some legitimacy by being attached to a credible, talented actor and he gains some legitimacy as a hetero male by being attached to a voluptuous woman. Nothing else makes sense because they don’t even really seem that into each other.

NP here: Agreed. If it was revealed he was gay, it would be devastating to his career. He's a heart throb to so many young women all over the globe, including lots of traditional conservative countries.

She's got a huge fan base online so I see this as a symbiotic, transactional PR relationship.

Here's my question: what does Kylie need legitimacy for? It's not like she's Kim and trying to get admitted to the bar or anything. Her mom created a makeup line for her and she poses sexily and accidentally got knocked up by someone who cheated on her with her "best" friend. Twice.

I imagine her momager has future plans for her that entail her being more of a businesswoman and less of a surgically enhanced reality star. You would think heading up a successful beauty brand would be enough for someone her age, but as we all know, this family is greedy as hell and wants their hands in every possible industry that they can profit from.

What successful beauty brand does she head? I've never heard of anyone using a Kylie product recently.

https://kyliecosmetics.com/

[Anonymous]

I'm re-watching Homeland with my teen sons and could not believe he was Dana's boyfriend. He was so young then! My kids got a kick out of it--seeing him back then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean, I don't want to have sex with him, but I think he's interesting looking. But I'm married, so I don't really need to find him F*able, right?

Back to the subject: Kardashians. I'm in team "no" on the whole Kardashian deal. I don't think that it's the direction the world should be headed in to idolize shallow women who have figured out how to fully monetize objectification. But, millions of people have fallen for it, so, I can't really blame them for how stupid our society has become.

I only think this romance makes sense if he's actually in love with her. You can look at the whole chain of men who've fallen for a Kardashian and left the relationship a shell of their former selves. They are kind of like sirens, but instead of killing those men, they suck the life out of them.

Do you feel the same way about society’s idolization of sports figures? Actors and politicians? How about venture capitalists cosplaying as engineers? Are “shallow” women more or less bad for society than the heads of mega corporations who kill small business and community?

I’m not into anything the Kardashians are peddling, but a lot of women and girls are. If women are going to be objectified anyway (and we all know that they are) then I say good for them for figuring out how to maintain control and make some money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have an open relationship. He fooled around with someone my son knows from college. He's straight and sleeps around

I'm sure he does but I don't think it's an 'open' relationship for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They're cute and seem so in love!

I'm surprised he'd want to be involved with Kardashians...but then again he seems besotted.

It looks like a fake relationship to me, and like she’s the only one trying to fulfill the contract. He looks mad that he’s stuck in it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is physically terrible looking. She looked really pretty at the Golden Globes.

Agree he’s terrible looking. And that awful mustache that’s in style only makes it worse.

Name someone who you think isn’t terrible looking.

I’m not PP, but I can name hundreds of men I think aren’t terrible looking. TC is disgusting. Then again, so is Kylie.