Why are younger men so right wing?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp


No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.


That is the difference: you care about statistics. I care about every single woman.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My beyond left-wing young adult DD told me, in secret, that she is appalled by parents having their young kids change gender. I was glad she expressed her opinion, but why does she have to hide it from her friends?
Do you all not agree that it is messed up to allow underage children to change gender?


The gender change thing really affects young Women the most. It’s unsafe for men to be allowed in women’s spaces period


Yes, by far the biggest threat to the safety of young women are trans people. Oh, wait, that might be a little off.


Why are you minimizing women's concern about this?


Because there really are not cases where your fears have been realized. As others have noted, women are more likely to be threatened by a reverend or preacher or rich businessman than a trans person. They are more likely to be in a car accident or a mass shooting than be threatened by a trans person. Trans people have their own issues to be castigated and discriminated against as the right has done to be divisive. What happened to "live and let live" and "don't tread on me" and "get the government off our backs?"


I suggest you read up, because there have been widely publicized cases of problems, including the rape of a female student by a so-called trans kid in the locker room of a DC suburb high school.


Yes, there have been problems. I am not trying ti minimize it, but that one case is cited every.single.time....there are not thousands of cases or hundreds of thousands like there are with rich white men raping young boys and girls. Yet you all want to excuse and miminize trump and epstein and cite this one suburban DC case over and over and over as if it was an epidemic.


Sadly men have always abused women and children.

The change is now Spaces which were historically safe places for women no longer are due to the prioritization of mentally ill men.

https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/2002307515288338883?s=46

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole men-in-women’s-sports issue is a scare tactic. That’s it. This is so incredibly rare. As another poster stated, it should be handled locally on a case by case basis. I only hear republicans talking about this. The only time I hear Democrats talking about it, they are responding to a question. And their answer is basically that it is not a federal government issue. This should be left to families and doctors. Democrats ARE the party of small government, and we need to start claiming that title. Rs want the government up in everyone’s business.

Also, if Rs would stop looking at people’s genitals in locker rooms and restrooms, this would be much less of an issue for them. I have no clue how many times I have shared these spaces with trans people because I don’t stare at people’s genitals.

And yet you could remove this “scare tactic” by abandoning the ridiculous take take that biological males identifying as females have as much right to women’s spaces in sports and locker rooms as biological women, but choose not to.


I wonder if folks like you will ever realize what fools they’ve made of you, making a nearly non-existent problem into your complete identity, distracting you from the things that matter.

Ii might be the same people that were building bunkers for Y2K.


And here we are, turning to the name calling when woman raised her legitimate concern.


I didn’t call anyone a name. I said that they’ve made a fool of her. It’s ok, it happens every day in some days. I’ve been scammed, too.


You sure have. Imagine believing that men can become women.


I guess science and psychology escape you as real things?


XX to XY?

XY to XX?

No, you think political science is science.

Newsflash: it isn't.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp


No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.


That is the difference: you care about statistics. I care about every single woman.


Do you care about the women in Loudoun county that were raped by anyone other than a trans person? Were there any? Probably not, right? I don’t think it ever happens.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp


No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.


I think we all know it's statistically rare. So now we can have the honest discussion: you think these cases are an acceptable risk in order to help trans people feel more comfortable. It's a zero sum game- either women, or trans people, get to feel comfortable. I am honest about the fact that I choose the safety for women at the cost of comfort for trans people. It's not fun to admit that you're the bad guy to one side, but it's honest, and it's the only path to compromise that treats both sides with dignity. Because saying that it was okay for these poor girls to be raped because it's rare- that isn't treating people with dignity.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp


No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.


That is the difference: you care about statistics. I care about every single woman.


Do you care about the women in Loudoun county that were raped by anyone other than a trans person? Were there any? Probably not, right? I don’t think it ever happens.


There's a shocking amount of rape in the school systems in and around DC. Breathtakingly high rates compared to national averages. But that's not the discussion we are having now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp


No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.


That is the difference: you care about statistics. I care about every single woman.


Do you care about the women in Loudoun county that were raped by anyone other than a trans person? Were there any? Probably not, right? I don’t think it ever happens.


It’s so telling how people like you are are entirely unable to stay on topic. Because you have no logical arguments to make.

It’s deflect deflect deflect with whataboutism in every single comment.

What about gun control?
What about women who are raped?
What about Epstein?
What about Trump being a bad guy?

Young Men are simply tired of having to pretend that humans can change their sex.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp


No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.


I think we all know it's statistically rare. So now we can have the honest discussion: you think these cases are an acceptable risk in order to help trans people feel more comfortable. It's a zero sum game- either women, or trans people, get to feel comfortable. I am honest about the fact that I choose the safety for women at the cost of comfort for trans people. It's not fun to admit that you're the bad guy to one side, but it's honest, and it's the only path to compromise that treats both sides with dignity. Because saying that it was okay for these poor girls to be raped because it's rare- that isn't treating people with dignity.


This might blow your mind but rapes happen in places other than women’s bathrooms.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp


No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.


I think we all know it's statistically rare. So now we can have the honest discussion: you think these cases are an acceptable risk in order to help trans people feel more comfortable. It's a zero sum game- either women, or trans people, get to feel comfortable. I am honest about the fact that I choose the safety for women at the cost of comfort for trans people. It's not fun to admit that you're the bad guy to one side, but it's honest, and it's the only path to compromise that treats both sides with dignity. Because saying that it was okay for these poor girls to be raped because it's rare- that isn't treating people with dignity.


This might blow your mind but rapes happen in places other than women’s bathrooms.


Your tone really suggests you don't care.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp


No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.


I think we all know it's statistically rare. So now we can have the honest discussion: you think these cases are an acceptable risk in order to help trans people feel more comfortable. It's a zero sum game- either women, or trans people, get to feel comfortable. I am honest about the fact that I choose the safety for women at the cost of comfort for trans people. It's not fun to admit that you're the bad guy to one side, but it's honest, and it's the only path to compromise that treats both sides with dignity. Because saying that it was okay for these poor girls to be raped because it's rare- that isn't treating people with dignity.


This might blow your mind but rapes happen in places other than women’s bathrooms.


Your tone really suggests you don't care.


I don’t care to pretend that keeping trans people out of woman’s bathrooms is something that makes women safer.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My beyond left-wing young adult DD told me, in secret, that she is appalled by parents having their young kids change gender. I was glad she expressed her opinion, but why does she have to hide it from her friends?
Do you all not agree that it is messed up to allow underage children to change gender?


The gender change thing really affects young Women the most. It’s unsafe for men to be allowed in women’s spaces period


Yes, by far the biggest threat to the safety of young women are trans people. Oh, wait, that might be a little off.


Why are you minimizing women's concern about this?


Why are you grossly overhyping the concern? Is denying base rate a bug or a feature for you? Your argument seems to depend on it. That's not minimization of concern, it's pointing out argumentation fallacy.

A young woman has a statistically MUCH higher chance of dying from a reaction to a bee sting than of being sexually assaulted by a trans woman or losing a scholarship to a trans woman. Of being killed by a lightning strike. Of being killed by a fridge or piece of furniture falling on them. Being shot in a mass shooting. Being hit by a car. And so on.

Anonymous wrote:
I'm not the person that is posting about it. I was watching the interaction and was curious why you were so dismissive. I think you should just acknowledge that you believe it is an acceptable risk for women to have to manage in previously female spaces. That is at least an honest conversation, vs pretending that this roll out has been without any problems.


It's odd they quote how rare it is because there are so few trans, but then they throw a fit if we don't accommodate the 1 in 10000.

Math isn't their sport.


At least this is a more honest take. Seems like you’re acknowledging that trans people aren’t a threat but you just don’t want to accommodate them. A lot of people feel this way about people who practice different religions, people with disabilities, anyone who is not exactly like them. Is that you?


I don't read it that way. I think she acknowledged they are a threat and they are rare.

Here's the superintendent of Loudon County Public Schools acknowledging that their policy of allowing so-called trans people into girls locker rooms led to two rapes. After the first girl was raped, they transferred the trans student to another school, where he raped another girl. When one of the fathers brought this up at a school board meeting, they had him arrested. This mea culpa came after months of them calling everyone homophobes. They didn't have any concern for the raped teen girls whatsoever. But they did the right thing and acknowledged that they didnt provide a safe environment.

https://youtu.be/FPgLu5iYsQo?si=rIe2N3bhbyGLyhlE

A certain percentage of people claiming to be trans are actually AGPs. Any honest discussion will admit this. You're okay with having AGPs get into the locker rooms along with the trans, and for women to be raped by them. I mean, just admit it. Then we can go about installing better security in women's spaces, demanding the presence of guards, etc.


The big plot twist here is that the kid who committed the sexual assault in Loudoun County is not and was not trans. He never said he was trans, the sheriffs department that arrested him said he was not trans, the father of the victim said the boy was not trans. The trans narrative was created by right wing shitstirring pundits who latched onto the bit about him wearing a skirt. The kid wore a skirt to school to be non-conforming and rebellious but never proclaimed it to be about trans identity. Check the facts from the actual sources rather than what right wing pundits claimed and you will find this to be the truth.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole men-in-women’s-sports issue is a scare tactic. That’s it. This is so incredibly rare. As another poster stated, it should be handled locally on a case by case basis. I only hear republicans talking about this. The only time I hear Democrats talking about it, they are responding to a question. And their answer is basically that it is not a federal government issue. This should be left to families and doctors. Democrats ARE the party of small government, and we need to start claiming that title. Rs want the government up in everyone’s business.

Also, if Rs would stop looking at people’s genitals in locker rooms and restrooms, this would be much less of an issue for them. I have no clue how many times I have shared these spaces with trans people because I don’t stare at people’s genitals.

And yet you could remove this “scare tactic” by abandoning the ridiculous take take that biological males identifying as females have as much right to women’s spaces in sports and locker rooms as biological women, but choose not to.


I wonder if folks like you will ever realize what fools they’ve made of you, making a nearly non-existent problem into your complete identity, distracting you from the things that matter.

Ii might be the same people that were building bunkers for Y2K.

I’m the poster you’re responding to and this isn’t the only issue I care about. I may care more than most as the parent of a high level female athlete, but it is not my identity. I’m responding to you because I am incredulous that you (and another far leftists) still refuse to acknowledge how ridiculous it is to have thrown your full support behind allowing males identifying as women to take a place in women’s spaces. You’re deflecting left and right in this thread with “what about”, etc. but still refuse to acknowledge how misguided your support of this is.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp


No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.


That is the difference: you care about statistics. I care about every single woman.


Do you care about the women in Loudoun county that were raped by anyone other than a trans person? Were there any? Probably not, right? I don’t think it ever happens.


It’s so telling how people like you are are entirely unable to stay on topic. Because you have no logical arguments to make.

It’s deflect deflect deflect with whataboutism in every single comment.

What about gun control?
What about women who are raped?
What about Epstein?
What about Trump being a bad guy?

Young Men are simply tired of having to pretend that humans can change their sex.


It's so telling that you commit one fraudulent fallacy after another, base rate neglect, refusal to acknowledge the far bigger and far more legitimate concerns of others and so on. Not to mention that the core of your whole argument about trans people being a threat to women hinges on a story about a Loudoun County kid who wasn't even trans to begin with. This isn't being dismissive, or minimizing legitimate concerns, it's about calling out your outright lies and bullshit.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole men-in-women’s-sports issue is a scare tactic. That’s it. This is so incredibly rare. As another poster stated, it should be handled locally on a case by case basis. I only hear republicans talking about this. The only time I hear Democrats talking about it, they are responding to a question. And their answer is basically that it is not a federal government issue. This should be left to families and doctors. Democrats ARE the party of small government, and we need to start claiming that title. Rs want the government up in everyone’s business.

Also, if Rs would stop looking at people’s genitals in locker rooms and restrooms, this would be much less of an issue for them. I have no clue how many times I have shared these spaces with trans people because I don’t stare at people’s genitals.

And yet you could remove this “scare tactic” by abandoning the ridiculous take take that biological males identifying as females have as much right to women’s spaces in sports and locker rooms as biological women, but choose not to.


So you are proposing to make all bathrooms unisex like airplanes? Works for me.

I mean yeah, single occupancy bathrooms like on airplanes are not the issue 🙄 Is this really the best you’ve got at this point?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp


No one is saying this didn't happen. What they are saying is, this case is cited over and over as evidence of a widespread societal issue, when statistically, it isn't.


I think we all know it's statistically rare. So now we can have the honest discussion: you think these cases are an acceptable risk in order to help trans people feel more comfortable. It's a zero sum game- either women, or trans people, get to feel comfortable. I am honest about the fact that I choose the safety for women at the cost of comfort for trans people. It's not fun to admit that you're the bad guy to one side, but it's honest, and it's the only path to compromise that treats both sides with dignity. Because saying that it was okay for these poor girls to be raped because it's rare- that isn't treating people with dignity.


You can choose to live your life in fear of something that will never directly impact you, or you can take on issues that are more likely to directly impact you. Statistically, it is very rare, to be raped by a trans person in a bathroom or locker room. On the other hand, the chances of being raped by a man in any other setting, including a bathroom or locker room, is much higher. Still higher, is to be shot in a mass casualty event or be in a car accident. So you can spend your time focusing on things that, while possible, are extremely unlikely to harm you, or you can worry about things that are more likely to impact you. Focusing on something so rare as a transperson raping you is just....bizarre.

Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: