James Comey Indictment
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
This is what happens when you hire people with this amazing pedigree. Have you even heard of these schools?
Pam Bondi: Stetson Law Lindsey Halligan: U of Miami Law Ed Martin: St. Louis University Law Kash Patel: Pace Law Separately I have to point out the Schiff whistleblower’s amazing education. I guess Shasta College was too challenging to finish: Chris Bish earned a high school diploma from Enterprise High School and attended Shasta College. |
Anonymous
Is Shasta accredited |
Anonymous
|
And today's Episode of "Punting Ms. Lyndsey"
This reply memorandum argues that the government's pursuit of an indictment against James B. Comey, Jr. is plagued by misconduct that "shocks the conscience," necessitating the disclosure of grand jury proceedings. The central claim is that the government committed constitutional violations, including conducting a warrantless search of privileged attorney-client materials and using them before the grand jury, misstating fundamental principles of law, and failing to present significant exculpatory evidence. Most critically, the government has conceded that it never presented the operative indictment to the grand jury for a vote, meaning no valid indictment was returned before the statute of limitations expired. Mr. Comey contends that these profound, compounded irregularities provide the necessary "particularized basis" under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to compel the disclosure of the grand jury transcripts, as grounds may exist to dismiss the entire indictment. The argument for disclosure is reinforced by several specific and cumulative irregularities. Counsel argues that the prosecutor, Ms. Halligan, made "fundamental misstatements of the law" to the grand jury and may have failed to properly instruct them on issues like Mr. Comey's Fifth Amendment rights or the legal requirement that a false-statements charge cannot rest on ambiguous questions. The defense further asserts that the introduction of unconstitutionally seized evidence from a warrantless search and privileged communications prejudiced the defendant, especially given the "centrality" of these materials to the presentation. Additionally, the government's recent concession that it intends to rely on testimony for Count Two which the grand jury previously rejected ("no true bill") demonstrates significant tension and accentuates concerns about how the grand jury was instructed on the law and facts, warranting a "close inspection of her conduct." The disclosure of these proceedings is sought to determine the extent of prosecutorial misconduct and the validity of the charged counts. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.582135/gov.uscourts.vaed.582135.208.0.pdf |
Anonymous
| The judge in charge of Comey's trial worked for Comey for 3 years at the beginning of his career. Comey was his mentor. So how do you think this trial will turn out? |
Anonymous
| WSJ: Charges against Comey and Letitia James were dismissed due to Halligan’s improper appointment. |
Anonymous
Gift Link: https://www.wsj.com/us-news/james-comey-letitia-james-cases-dismissed-7b732d17?st=H2EN23&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink |
Anonymous
Or, in a reality-based view, the current DOJ has about as much chance of winning a trial as a three-legged horse has of winning the Kentucky Derby, and that’s for one in which they aren’t making everything up as they are here. |
Anonymous
More info here - dismissed without prejudice but hasn’t the statute of limitations run for Comey? https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/judge-dismisses-cases-james-comey-letitia-james-finding-prosecutor-was-rcna244775 |
Anonymous
Perhaps there’s something a competent prosecutor could have done about that, hmmm? |
Anonymous
According to their public bios they never worked at the same place at the same time. Where exactly did the judge work for Comey? |
Anonymous
|
Anonymous
|
Nothing to see here...
Turns out Durham's former righthand man goes way back with James Comey and his lead defense attorney. Jack Eckenrode, a DOJ contractor, once worked for Comey's lawyer Patrick Fitzgerald and praised Comey after Trump fired him. Eckenrode's now lead investigator on Comey case. |
Anonymous
They are all awful, obviously, but f right off with your elitist nonsense. (And reflect on Larry summers in the Epstein files as well as Trump and all of his idiot spawn being Penn graduates.) |
Anonymous
If this is your position on prior affiliations (even attenuated ones), then why does MAGA like Scott Bessent? He was, afterall, Georg Soros's right hand man for years. Without Scott, George would not be uber-wealthy. |
Anonymous
| bwhahahahahahahaha |