Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

[Anonymous]

Whatever. Even if by some chance he's innocent I'm ok with him being found guilty due to his behavior

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On December 24, 2002, Laci Peterson disappeared. On December 26, about 4:30 p.m., the Medinas arrived home to discover they had been burglarized. Later that night, the trailing dog Merlin led to the Gallo Winery. On December 31, Deanna Renfro who lives right across the street from Gallo Winery pawned a watch identical to Laci's. On January 2, Todd and Pearce who live 2 blocks from Gallo winery are arrested and admit to the Medina burglary. In late January 2003 the Modesto Police Department received the Aponte tip, which involves the Tenbrink brothers who also live within 2 blocks of the Gallo Winery and are known associates of Todd. The Aponte tip reported that Laci encountered Todd as he was committing the Medina burglary.

Not identical. Laci had a diamond watch the pawned watch had no diamonds.

Stones were missing and the watch was scratched up implying Laci probably was in a struggle.

Where was Laci’s Croton watch from
Her grandmother then? It wasn’t found at the house and the pawn slip says the watch pawned on Dec 31 was a Croton watch. She wore it every single day according to Scott and family?
This was pre cell phone days when watches were important to tell time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whatever. Even if by some chance he's innocent I'm ok with him being found guilty due to his behavior

Are you ok with sharia law too by chance? You should move to Saudi Arabia since you are a fan of moral police

[Anonymous]

I think many of the women here don’t want to admit their husbands probably would grieve just like Scott meaning not very much and not very loud

[Anonymous]

I’m sorry to break the news here but many men are just stupid. They cheat, they lie, they don’t cry in front of cops/other men because it makes them “less than a man”, they watch porn and call their side woman up during a missing person’s investigations.

This doesn’t mean they are murderers though that dismembered their wife and unborn. It means they’re just stupid.

There’s no doubt Scott was an idiot and Laci deserved a better husband but where’s the motive that he wanted to kill her? Likely, Laci wouldve had enough after the kid was born and she would’ve divorced him soon enough. I wouldn’t say all men are like Scott but maybe 50% are

[Anonymous]

I’m going to guess Scott never saw his dad cry once and he learned that’s the way to be. 2002 was a different world than today. Men grew up in a very cold almost animalistic way

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m going to guess Scott never saw his dad cry once and he learned that’s the way to be. 2002 was a different world than today. Men grew up in a very cold almost animalistic way

I think that was just your household. Or maybe yours was as dysfunctional and full of psychopaths as the Petersons. They seem disturbed. Scott was their “golden boy” after all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think many of the women here don’t want to admit their husbands probably would grieve just like Scott meaning not very much and not very loud

A smart man would play the grieving husband. A twisted narcissist would not. He thought he was going to get away with it but he didn’t which is why the state is not buying any of his new trial nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m going to guess Scott never saw his dad cry once and he learned that’s the way to be. 2002 was a different world than today. Men grew up in a very cold almost animalistic way

I think that was just your household. Or maybe yours was as dysfunctional and full of psychopaths as the Petersons. They seem disturbed. Scott was their “golden boy” after all.

I never saw my father cry but I knew he was a loving man.

Likely, Scott wouldn’t have cried on the day Connor was born. That doesn’t mean he doesn’t love his wife or kid. Some men are just wired due to cold upbringings by their father to be that way

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think many of the women here don’t want to admit their husbands probably would grieve just like Scott meaning not very much and not very loud

A smart man would play the grieving husband. A twisted narcissist would not. He thought he was going to get away with it but he didn’t which is why the state is not buying any of his new trial nonsense.

Or a narcissist would.

Scott didn’t know he had to put on a performance. Laci’s brother and mother Sharon were strong and brave and calmer than Lacis dad during the initial press conferences. Does that mean their love for Laci is less than the stepdad?

Grief is unpredictable and sometimes hits people like a wall later on. Sometimes the initial shock hits first so people are calm because they haven’t absorbed the reality of what’s happened yet.

[Anonymous]

It’s a shame Scott’s son wasnt born. He would’ve had a strong dad. I’m surprised Scott hasn’t committed suicide with all that’s happened to him

[Anonymous]

I think the real psychopaths are people like Nancy Grace who get green eyed and glib about the deaths of others and turn on the show and theatrics when the camera blinks on

[Anonymous]

Scott asked to leave the courtroom when they were showing the corpses of Laci and Connor and he finally did break down in tears the way the hyenas wanted that day but the judge didn’t allow him to leave so he was forced to see his son and wife’s decomposed corpses up close

[Anonymous]

These are the burglars. Todd is the one who bragged to a fellow inmate that he argued with Laci because she confronted him to stop robbing the house that morning. Several inmates relayed this information to others and one guard was so disturbed he relayed the information to Modesto PD

[Anonymous]

Why was this guy bragging in jail about confronting Laci?

Even if he didn’t kidnap and kill Laci, it proves Scott is innocent if he saw Laci that morning after 10am when he left for work.