Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not quite, the proposal is to allow Idaho stops which lets cyclists treat stop signs as yield signs. It is actually associated with fewer cyclist injuries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_stop
Wow. Who knew stop signs were so dangerous? And here I was thinking they made the roads safer.
Because getting up to speed on a bike takes longer and drivers often don't see or ignore a stopped cyclist. Everywhere that has tried it has seen a decrease in injuries.
+1000 you only need to commute to work on a bicycle for a week to understand this. If you haven’t, it is just too difficult a concept to understand for the average person with a car mindset.
Maybe you shouldn't be riding a bike next to cars on the road where cars are if it is dangerous for you to follow simple traffic regulations. Have you ever thought of that? Maybe if you drove a car for five minutes you would understand this. Bikers make driving like playing Frogger. Use the trails provided.
I can’t tell you how many times my husband has wiped out on his bike due to bad judgment because he HAS to have that ride. Ice, snow, darkness. It’s ALL about the ride, speed, etc. The mindset is “I want to live in xyz place and ride my bike, so change everything to make it all about my ride”