New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

in Soccer Rankings they are currently fourth in Virginia ahead of all GA teams, and far ahead of any RL team.

[Anonymous]

Accountability? They were correct. It started at the beginning of 2025 and will start again in 2026. A couple clubs in this area are already slated to switch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Accountability? They were correct. It started at the beginning of 2025 and will start again in 2026. A couple clubs in this area are already slated to switch.

Nope - I'm talking nationally and there is no switch at all. Just DMV

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Accountability? They were correct. It started at the beginning of 2025 and will start again in 2026. A couple clubs in this area are already slated to switch.

Which clubs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

in Soccer Rankings they are currently fourth in Virginia ahead of all GA teams, and far ahead of any RL team.

Good thing games are played on the field and not in an app

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

in Soccer Rankings they are currently fourth in Virginia ahead of all GA teams, and far ahead of any RL team.

Yet they lost to a GA Aspire team a few weeks ago. Proves what the rankings are really worth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

in Soccer Rankings they are currently fourth in Virginia ahead of all GA teams, and far ahead of any RL team.

Yet they lost to a GA Aspire team a few weeks ago. Proves what the rankings are really worth.

Haven’t played any GA Aspire teams.

May not be lighting the world on fire but certainly are not a rec team.

That was a weird comment for someone to post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

It looks like they got better. They lost 2 starters though. How did that happen? Are they using trapped players?

No trapped players. One of the players was a starter but didn't really accomplish much. The other shared time like everyone else and the drama from the poor kids momager was insane. Clearly other kids have stepped up. VDA doesn't care about the middle school teams any way they're just waiting for tryouts in March when they cut half the kids and rebuild from NVA and SYC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

in Soccer Rankings they are currently fourth in Virginia ahead of all GA teams, and far ahead of any RL team.

Yet they lost to a GA Aspire team a few weeks ago. Proves what the rankings are really worth.

Haven’t played any GA Aspire teams.

May not be lighting the world on fire but certainly are not a rec team.

That was a weird comment for someone to post.

they were not an Aspire team, believe they play EDP/NL league

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

It looks like they got better. They lost 2 starters though. How did that happen? Are they using trapped players?

No trapped players. One of the players was a starter but didn't really accomplish much. The other shared time like everyone else and the drama from the poor kids momager was insane. Clearly other kids have stepped up. VDA doesn't care about the middle school teams any way they're just waiting for tryouts in March when they cut half the kids and rebuild from NVA and SYC.

Build from kids cut from NVA and SYC, oh boy! Guess you gotta do what you gotta do to field a team right?

[Anonymous]

It’ll be BP next year, better watch out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

It looks like they got better. They lost 2 starters though. How did that happen? Are they using trapped players?

No trapped players. One of the players was a starter but didn't really accomplish much. The other shared time like everyone else and the drama from the poor kids momager was insane. Clearly other kids have stepped up. VDA doesn't care about the middle school teams any way they're just waiting for tryouts in March when they cut half the kids and rebuild from NVA and SYC.

Build from kids cut from NVA and SYC, oh boy! Guess you gotta do what you gotta do to field a team right?

Team will still be mediocre at best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

It looks like they got better. They lost 2 starters though. How did that happen? Are they using trapped players?

No trapped players. One of the players was a starter but didn't really accomplish much. The other shared time like everyone else and the drama from the poor kids momager was insane. Clearly other kids have stepped up. VDA doesn't care about the middle school teams any way they're just waiting for tryouts in March when they cut half the kids and rebuild from NVA and SYC.

Build from kids cut from NVA and SYC, oh boy! Guess you gotta do what you gotta do to field a team right?

Team will still be mediocre at best.

Last year, a rec team. This year, not relevant. Next year, mediocre. At least we are improving!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

in Soccer Rankings they are currently fourth in Virginia ahead of all GA teams, and far ahead of any RL team.

Yet they lost to a GA Aspire team a few weeks ago. Proves what the rankings are really worth.

Haven’t played any GA Aspire teams.

May not be lighting the world on fire but certainly are not a rec team.

That was a weird comment for someone to post.

it was the 2013 team that lost 6-2 to an aspire team

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With that information I’m assuming that VDA, Arlington and FVU weren’t strengthened by the NVA move to GA. I’m particularly interesting in the 2012/u14 age group

Vda weaker. Nva largely ntact minus one impact player and two age downers.
Others negligible

Vda is weaker because NVA 2012 stayed intact?

VDA didn't get any players from NVA at that age group. I think VDA lost a player or two. They may have gain a player or two in fairness, but it wasn't from NVA or any of the other higher leverage players from FVU or Arlington either.

VDA 2012 is a RL team. Wouldn’t even win Virginia ECNL-RL conference. Hardly worth talking about here.

in Soccer Rankings they are currently fourth in Virginia ahead of all GA teams, and far ahead of any RL team.

Yet they lost to a GA Aspire team a few weeks ago. Proves what the rankings are really worth.

Haven’t played any GA Aspire teams.

May not be lighting the world on fire but certainly are not a rec team.

That was a weird comment for someone to post.

it was the 2013 team that lost 6-2 to an aspire team

2012 lost to Baltimore Bays