I'm pretty dissapointed in D's not challenging HRC.

[Anonymous]

I'm quite disappointed in Dems not challenging HRC for the nom. Grow some balls (or ovaries) please!

Kaine, Klobuchar, Gillibrand, Deval Patrick, Sherrod Brown, and Warren should all be running and making their case.

[Anonymous]

There are four other people running for the nomination right now. Do you really want to see the Democratic field turning into the same side show as the Republican?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are four other people running for the nomination right now. Do you really want to see the Democratic field turning into the same side show as the Republican?

+1 It is imperative that a Democrat win the presidency. Do you really want another Republican choosing the Supreme Court? We need to come together now while the Republicans are still attacking each other.

[Anonymous]

BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are four other people running for the nomination right now. Do you really want to see the Democratic field turning into the same side show as the Republican?

+1 It is imperative that a Democrat win the presidency. Do you really want another Republican choosing the Supreme Court? We need to come together now while the Republicans are still attacking each other.

X1,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are four other people running for the nomination right now. Do you really want to see the Democratic field turning into the same side show as the Republican?

All the ones I mentioned would be polling above Milquetoast O'Malley, Racist Webb, and turncoat Chaffee.

THere are really only two proper candidates - HRC and Sanders. There's room for more and stronger debate.

There were a number in 2008 - it didn't hurt the process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are four other people running for the nomination right now. Do you really want to see the Democratic field turning into the same side show as the Republican?

+1 It is imperative that a Democrat win the presidency. Do you really want another Republican choosing the Supreme Court? We need to come together now while the Republicans are still attacking each other.

... which is exactly why I (not OP, a new poster) wish some other Ds would enter the field. I don't think HRC can win in the general election, she just has too much political baggage. I would like a viable D alternative to win the primary and face whichever R makes it out of the Hunger Games.

(I honestly like Sanders, and I think he has a better shot in the general election than many think, but I don't think he'll survive the primary.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

You are a very foolish and short-sighted person. Do as you wish in the primary but don't be a fool and vote for Bush or Trump in the general election. Or a third party candidate. Remember what the Nader voters did in Florida in 2000 -- they gave us two wars and a Supreme Court that saddled us with Citizens United.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

You are a very foolish and short-sighted person. Do as you wish in the primary but don't be a fool and vote for Bush or Trump in the general election. Or a third party candidate. Remember what the Nader voters did in Florida in 2000 -- they gave us two wars and a Supreme Court that saddled us with Citizens United.

Not the PP you addressed but when you have Democrats who are not willing to vote for a Democratic nominee, perhaps the problem is with the nominee and not the voter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

You are a very foolish and short-sighted person. Do as you wish in the primary but don't be a fool and vote for Bush or Trump in the general election. Or a third party candidate. Remember what the Nader voters did in Florida in 2000 -- they gave us two wars and a Supreme Court that saddled us with Citizens United.

The Gore campaign should never have let it get close enough to allow Nader to play spoiler. That's entirely on them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

You are a very foolish and short-sighted person. Do as you wish in the primary but don't be a fool and vote for Bush or Trump in the general election. Or a third party candidate. Remember what the Nader voters did in Florida in 2000 -- they gave us two wars and a Supreme Court that saddled us with Citizens United.

Not the PP you addressed but when you have Democrats who are not willing to vote for a Democratic nominee, perhaps the problem is with the nominee and not the voter.

+1000
And, there are MANY problems with the nominee.

[Anonymous]

More and more momentum for Sanders is growing. If he were to pick Warren as a running mate, that would ROCK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

You are a very foolish and short-sighted person. Do as you wish in the primary but don't be a fool and vote for Bush or Trump in the general election. Or a third party candidate. Remember what the Nader voters did in Florida in 2000 -- they gave us two wars and a Supreme Court that saddled us with Citizens United.

I'm foolish and short sighted because I wouldn't vote for the candidate you want me to? The beauty of this country is that you and I both get to make our own choice. I'm not going to call you names for yours.