I'm pretty dissapointed in D's not challenging HRC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

You are a very foolish and short-sighted person. Do as you wish in the primary but don't be a fool and vote for Bush or Trump in the general election. Or a third party candidate. Remember what the Nader voters did in Florida in 2000 -- they gave us two wars and a Supreme Court that saddled us with Citizens United.

The Gore campaign should never have let it get close enough to allow Nader to play spoiler. That's entirely on them.

Yes, entirely on "them" and yet we are the ones who are suffering! How does that begin to make sense in the real world? It was that close and we all lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

You are a very foolish and short-sighted person. Do as you wish in the primary but don't be a fool and vote for Bush or Trump in the general election. Or a third party candidate. Remember what the Nader voters did in Florida in 2000 -- they gave us two wars and a Supreme Court that saddled us with Citizens United.

Not the PP you addressed but when you have Democrats who are not willing to vote for a Democratic nominee, perhaps the problem is with the nominee and not the voter.

+1000
And, there are MANY problems with the nominee.

Seriously, so the f what? If you are happy with a Republican President then vote your precious conscience in the general election. I, however, am a grown up and educated woman and I have seen the damage (Bush 2000) that the "greater of two evils" can cause. Big picture, people!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

You are a very foolish and short-sighted person. Do as you wish in the primary but don't be a fool and vote for Bush or Trump in the general election. Or a third party candidate. Remember what the Nader voters did in Florida in 2000 -- they gave us two wars and a Supreme Court that saddled us with Citizens United.

I'm foolish and short sighted because I wouldn't vote for the candidate you want me to? The beauty of this country is that you and I both get to make our own choice. I'm not going to call you names for yours.

No, you are undereducated if you are going to vote for a Republican and yes, extremely short sighted to vote for a third party candidate if you are a liberal or progressive. Take your choice. Which are you - stupid or short-sighted? Those are your only two options in the real world we live in.

[Anonymous]

Democrat. Ivy educated. Voting for Trump.

[Anonymous]

I'm betting many of the posters on this thread and others claiming to want Democrat choices besides Clinton, are actually Republican voters hoping for a nomination battle, because they recognize the Republican nomination process is an absolute dumpster fire right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm betting many of the posters on this thread and others claiming to want Democrat choices besides Clinton, are actually Republican voters hoping for a nomination battle, because they recognize the Republican nomination process is an absolute dumpster fire right now.

That's why Bernie Sanders has closed the gap to 12 in NH and HRC is below 50% there.

No - it is because smart dems see some real red flags in HRC's bid and would like a hedge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrat. Ivy educated. Voting for Trump.

Liar. Liar. This publicity stunt of Trumps will never get that far.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm betting many of the posters on this thread and others claiming to want Democrat choices besides Clinton, are actually Republican voters hoping for a nomination battle, because they recognize the Republican nomination process is an absolute dumpster fire right now.

That's why Bernie Sanders has closed the gap to 12 in NH and HRC is below 50% there.

No - it is because smart dems see some real red flags in HRC's bid and would like a hedge.

I will vote for HRC is she is the Democratic candidate. Bernie Sanders if he is the Democratic candidate. A big yellow dog is he/she is the Democratic candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrat. Ivy educated. Voting for Trump.

^^ Lie. Lie. Likely truth.

Are you the poster who tosses Ivy slurs, seeming to think that all DCUM is in awe of the Ivies? We're not. Those posts are total nonsense from an out-of-touch, bitter fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm quite disappointed in Dems not challenging HRC for the nom. Grow some balls (or ovaries) please!

Kaine, Klobuchar, Gillibrand, Deval Patrick, Sherrod Brown, and Warren should all be running and making their case.

I am sure republicans are deeply disappointed that democrats arent running a long clown bus like republicans are.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

You are a very foolish and short-sighted person. Do as you wish in the primary but don't be a fool and vote for Bush or Trump in the general election. Or a third party candidate. Remember what the Nader voters did in Florida in 2000 -- they gave us two wars and a Supreme Court that saddled us with Citizens United.

You're a fool: gay marriage, Affordable Care Act, oh, and Citizens United helps liberals in huge ways, just ask Terry McCaulif (sic) if he'd like to give back all of Tom Steyer's cash that bought his victory for him....thanks to Citizens United.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, there are many of us who want HRC and would vote for her regardless of whomever else was running.

And there are quite a few Democrats and independents who would not vote for her ..... who voted for Obama and Bill Clinton.

This. Didn't vote for her last time, and I won't this time.

You are a very foolish and short-sighted person. Do as you wish in the primary but don't be a fool and vote for Bush or Trump in the general election. Or a third party candidate. Remember what the Nader voters did in Florida in 2000 -- they gave us two wars and a Supreme Court that saddled us with Citizens United.

You're a fool: gay marriage, Affordable Care Act, oh, and Citizens United helps liberals in huge ways, just ask Terry McCaulif (sic) if he'd like to give back all of Tom Steyer's cash that bought his victory for him....thanks to Citizens United.

Nonsense response. And do you really think I would defend the Citizens United decision based on Terry McCauliffe and local Virginia politics?! LOL

[Anonymous]

No need to. HRC will self destruct and Biden will be the caandidate by acclimation and he can beat any Republican, particularly as Trump running as an independent will split GOP.

[Anonymous]

I actually don't care. I already know I will never vote for another Republican as long as I live so it doesn't matter who the Democratic nominee is - she/he has my vote. And I have never been so stupid as to throw my vote away on a third party candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm betting many of the posters on this thread and others claiming to want Democrat choices besides Clinton, are actually Republican voters hoping for a nomination battle, because they recognize the Republican nomination process is an absolute dumpster fire right now.

That's why Bernie Sanders has closed the gap to 12 in NH and HRC is below 50% there.

No - it is because smart dems see some real red flags in HRC's bid and would like a hedge.

Bernie sanders cannot win the nomination. Even if could he could, he is too liberal.