Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who is screaming about it? Yes these 29 pages are a mixture of many women or men putting down middle-aged white woman as well as a number of women who find a slogan misogynistic, as the OP does.
NP. Add me to the group that finds it misogynistic. If this were a man, we might find him annoying, or not (sometimes the manager needs respectful input). But we wouldn't call him names and tell him to take his shake and shut up.
Actually we do. But Chad just let it go over his head, and it faded away. Karen, in turn, asked to see our manager.
PP here. Chad, Thad and Brad are a bit different--they're the dumb athletes who can't do math.
Karen is just trying to do something that, if this were a man, nobody would care.
I'd argue the opposite. People do care. Its just that men take their frustrations out in physical violence. See the two Bethesda racists who attacked bystanders in two consecutive weeks just recently. Also all the school shooters. The Las Vegas man who murdered 500 people in 10 minutes. The Oklahoma bomber.
Karens take their frustrations out on workers and individuals they deem social lower than them. They think their appearance and calling police (even when they are the ones in the wrong) will protect them.
So yes, we care when both sides of the coin take out frustrations on hapless individuals which is why we're calling the actions and behavior out.
You're conflating the Las Vegas shooter with someone who got bad service. You're saying both are equally in the wrong.
Then you're going the additional step of saying that the person who got bad service was a bully instead of respectful. It doesn't sound like OP wanted to "beat up on hapless individuals", let alone machine gun them.
We agree that the Las Vegas shooter was evil.
But somebody who got bad service and wants to talk to the manager, respectfully? What's wrong with that? If it were a man, you sure wouldn't care.