Realignment for SEC

[Anonymous]

I never understood how you did bonuses for non profit motivated entities. Its not like a sales goal, hours billed, or widgets created. And I doubt industry wants staff rewarded based on enforcement cases initiated, exams executed, and rules written.

Once you get into some non-measurable contribution, you can’t really differentiate between people well unless there is a clear outlier doing poorly. If everyone is doing well and trying hard, the bonuses create more issues than they solve.

And so many people seem to say they have a coworker that is the lazy outlier but also don’t actually understand what that person does.

At that point its just a mechanism to get people to stay until its paid out. While also creating a shit ton of office gossip and peaking over shoulders.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t the CBA control this issue? Or is that another provision that “doesn’t count”?

I am sure the chairman will find “substantive legal concerns” with something to deny staff other benefits.