Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Realignment for SEC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I never understood how you did bonuses for non profit motivated entities. Its not like a sales goal, hours billed, or widgets created. And I doubt industry wants staff rewarded based on enforcement cases initiated, exams executed, and rules written. Once you get into some non-measurable contribution, you can’t really differentiate between people well unless there is a clear outlier doing poorly. If everyone is doing well and trying hard, the bonuses create more issues than they solve. And so many people seem to say they have a coworker that is the lazy outlier but also don’t actually understand what that person does. At that point its just a mechanism to get people to stay until its paid out. While also creating a shit ton of office gossip and peaking over shoulders.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
