I'm an attorney. In my circle, a 40 hour/week job with only occasional (uncompensated) weekends/nights IS a "mommy track job." The women I work with graduated from T14 law schools, were on law review, and had federal clerkships. They're eminently qualified for the most demanding jobs. For them, a full-time job with a predictable schedule and some flexibility is the mommy track. |
| The OPM’s blanket approach may (likely) violate federal law. There is a strong argument to challenge it legally. Doesn’t mean your agency won’t abide by it anyway due to political pressure. But they may be required to do more work to justify it. |
What federal law? |
Telework Act of 2010 |
| The answer to this, beyond challenging it with grievances, etc., is to work to the rule. Follow each and every regulation and policy to the letter. No short cuts. No time-savers. Not a second of work after the clock. Don't bring your laptop home. Don't answer calls after hours. If people don't get their disability claims approved for 10 years because the form needs to filled out in triplicate and the physician signed in the wrong place, then that's too bad. No IRS refund check because we had to quadruple check your identify and get the Treasury secretary to hand sign the check? Too bad. |
Labor lawyers will have a field day with the OPM memo. |
THIS. FAFO. There will be no laptop at home. Answering questions on vacation. Staying for a late meeting. It’ll be 8 hours and done. |
Someone mentioned split shifts on a DCUM parent forum a while ago and it sounded like time card fraud and bad parenting. The person claimed they worked four hours during the day and four hours at night, starting after their children went to bed at 9 pm, and then woke their kids up every morning at 5 am, so their 4 and 5 year olds would nap for three hours in the middle of the day while they worked. I am completely opposed to what Trump is doing, but RTO started to seem reasonable after I read that post. |
So everyone in the federal government needs to pay for that? Shoot, even if 5% did it, does that mean the 95% have to be punished with no flexibility? |
And what about those of us who had hybrid jobs for over a decade before COVID even happened and lived close to the office, but then our office shut down and we have nowhere to go? What did we plan wrong? Should I have seen the Trump Administration and these ridiculous spiteful RTO EOs coming back in 2009? And like a PP said *I* was the one in the family who took the career hit. I graduated near the top of my class from a highly ranked law school. I gave up earnings for this flexibility because I knew I wanted to have kids. So many on this board want to lecture us for not planning better or not taking a career hit like everyone else, but for many of this, this was our plan/career hit to work for the government. But people got jealous of my life choices and decided it’s not fair (although I don’t hear similar outrage over telework in the private sector 🤔). It doesn’t seem like most posters are against employees in private industry getting to WAH, so I think it’s just the idea of the federal workforce they’re mad about, not telework itself. If our pay was cut in half and our benefits slashed and we were all told to work 80 hours per week, I’m sure these same people would cheer and tell us to suck it up because they’re hellbent on hating us no matter what. It’s frankly bizarre and they’ve clearly been brainwashed by Trump. |
It’s not fraud. Maxiflex schedules have been a thing forever. They are authorized by law. |
I saw someone say they might do this in another thread and they got lambasted for that idea anyway. |
Then you are stupid if you believe this narrative. A basic GS 11-13 track attorney job that only requires 40 hours/week with flex and hybrid is mommy tracked compared to big law. It’s not a hobby job, but it isn’t a high power legal career (outside of maybe DOJ litigators and SES). Perhaps “mommy tracked” has a bad connotation, but we all know it is usually moms making the decision to give up more pay for more flexibility. |
DP. I don’t think it should be on schools to fix the stress points work working parents. It’s already hard enough to hire teachers (many who are working parents themselves). Over the past couple decades we’ve tacked on things like active shooter drills and handling IEPs with inadequate resources without substantial pay increases. Now they need to fix childcare for us, oh and don’t forget to prep for ICE raids. I 100% think we need a working parent revolution, but having the Trump administration set such a hostile agenda toward working parents is a huge step backwards, and I can’t imagine asking locally funded school districts to become the stopgap to keeping society functioning and kids cared for. |
Oh my goodness to the majority of parents this is all common knowledge. Are you really not aware that people who have kids and by necessity also have jobs... are making tradeoffs & piecing things together every single fcking day? Yet you expect our taxes to pay your overcompensated salaries/benefits/vaca/snow days (omg!) ect ect while you get to sit home because god forbid you should be inconvenienced getting larla to all her extracurricular activities & camp Welcome to the majority's reality. Hope you enjoy your stay |