2029 Girls

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the reputation and connections to schools. Otherwise, it’s just like all the other dysfunctional clubs.

Connection to the school doesn't mean much when you don't have the players to back it up. Schools aren't going to do Capital any favors if the players are not up to par.

Fair Point. If your kid is trying to play for a top 10 school, then absolutely they need to be elite athletes and players. Very few Capital players are playing at UNC, BC, Northwestern, etc. However, as you go through the process and get past the top 10, it's not as much about lacrosse skills as one might think. High School, GPA, Club team, nice/intelligent kid, family or club connections, wealth, etc. all play a factor. If the kid can't catch, it's a non starter, but you'd be surprised how many just "OK" kids get courted by some very good universities/lacrosse programs.

Dropping Knowledge right here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the reputation and connections to schools. Otherwise, it’s just like all the other dysfunctional clubs.

that's about it. just what you see here.

And what is the appeal of M&D DC?

They’ve got the 2029 solid players. For now.

Are you referring to the ones who just beat the Capital 28 orange group?

I love this. Next Level ‘29 beat a B team in the class above them but has NEVER beaten a top MD team because they only have 2 star players 3-4 ok players and the rest are along for the ride and likely will never sniff any real college recruiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the reputation and connections to schools. Otherwise, it’s just like all the other dysfunctional clubs.

that's about it. just what you see here.

And what is the appeal of M&D DC?

They’ve got the 2029 solid players. For now.

Are you referring to the ones who just beat the Capital 28 orange group?

I love this. Next Level ‘29 beat a B team in the class above them but has NEVER beaten a top MD team because they only have 2 star players 3-4 ok players and the rest are along for the ride and likely will never sniff any real college recruiting.

Truth. And the star players are not learning how to play with other too players which will hurt them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the reputation and connections to schools. Otherwise, it’s just like all the other dysfunctional clubs.

that's about it. just what you see here.

And what is the appeal of M&D DC?

They’ve got the 2029 solid players. For now.

Are you referring to the ones who just beat the Capital 28 orange group?

I love this. Next Level ‘29 beat a B team in the class above them but has NEVER beaten a top MD team because they only have 2 star players 3-4 ok players and the rest are along for the ride and likely will never sniff any real college recruiting.

Truth. And the star players are not learning how to play with other too players which will hurt them.

Too=top

[Anonymous]

I love this. Next Level ‘29 beat a B team in the class above them but has NEVER beaten a top MD team because they only have 2 star players 3-4 ok players and the rest are along for the ride and likely will never sniff any real college recruiting.

Next Level girls doesn’t exist anymore…if you are referring to the 29 M&D DC team you must not have seen the roster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love this. Next Level ‘29 beat a B team in the class above them but has NEVER beaten a top MD team because they only have 2 star players 3-4 ok players and the rest are along for the ride and likely will never sniff any real college recruiting.

Next Level girls doesn’t exist anymore…if you are referring to the 29 M&D DC team you must not have seen the roster.

Isn’t it just NL plus a few former Pride girls?

[Anonymous]

If your kid is already on Hero’s Green or M&D Black do you still have them try out for Capitals?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If your kid is already on Hero’s Green or M&D Black do you still have them try out for Capitals?

Troll post

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If your kid is already on Hero’s Green or M&D Black do you still have them try out for Capitals?

Troll post

No you try out for M&D dc!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the reputation and connections to schools. Otherwise, it’s just like all the other dysfunctional clubs.

Connection to the school doesn't mean much when you don't have the players to back it up. Schools aren't going to do Capital any favors if the players are not up to par.

Fair Point. If your kid is trying to play for a top 10 school, then absolutely they need to be elite athletes and players. Very few Capital players are playing at UNC, BC, Northwestern, etc. However, as you go through the process and get past the top 10, it's not as much about lacrosse skills as one might think. High School, GPA, Club team, nice/intelligent kid, family or club connections, wealth, etc. all play a factor. If the kid can't catch, it's a non starter, but you'd be surprised how many just "OK" kids get courted by some very good universities/lacrosse programs.

Don’t see any Hero’s players on the rosters of UNC, BC or Northwestern. No M&D players at Northwestern (Capital has one). M&D has two at BC (Capital has one) and three at UNC (two without nepotism influence). Capital has one at UNC. MD once dominated the top teams but look at any of the rosters of the power house programs and the fact is that NY and Mass make up the vast majority of the juggernauts today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the reputation and connections to schools. Otherwise, it’s just like all the other dysfunctional clubs.

Connection to the school doesn't mean much when you don't have the players to back it up. Schools aren't going to do Capital any favors if the players are not up to par.

Fair Point. If your kid is trying to play for a top 10 school, then absolutely they need to be elite athletes and players. Very few Capital players are playing at UNC, BC, Northwestern, etc. However, as you go through the process and get past the top 10, it's not as much about lacrosse skills as one might think. High School, GPA, Club team, nice/intelligent kid, family or club connections, wealth, etc. all play a factor. If the kid can't catch, it's a non starter, but you'd be surprised how many just "OK" kids get courted by some very good universities/lacrosse programs.

Don’t see any Hero’s players on the rosters of UNC, BC or Northwestern. No M&D players at Northwestern (Capital has one). M&D has two at BC (Capital has one) and three at UNC (two without nepotism influence). Capital has one at UNC. MD once dominated the top teams but look at any of the rosters of the power house programs and the fact is that NY and Mass make up the vast majority of the juggernauts today.

M&D places girls at better lacrosse schools than Capital. You could argue Capital places girls at better academic schools. Hero's is hit or miss depending on class.

[Anonymous]

Fair Point. If your kid is trying to play for a top 10 school, then absolutely they need to be elite athletes and players. Very few Capital players are playing at UNC, BC, Northwestern, etc. However, as you go through the process and get past the top 10, it's not as much about lacrosse skills as one might think. High School, GPA, Club team, nice/intelligent kid, family or club connections, wealth, etc. all play a factor. If the kid can't catch, it's a non starter, but you'd be surprised how many just "OK" kids get courted by some very good universities/lacrosse programs.

Don’t see any Hero’s players on the rosters of UNC, BC or Northwestern. No M&D players at Northwestern (Capital has one). M&D has two at BC (Capital has one) and three at UNC (two without nepotism influence). Capital has one at UNC. MD once dominated the top teams but look at any of the rosters of the power house programs and the fact is that NY and Mass make up the vast majority of the juggernauts today.

Nobody on that Next Level team is good enough to play for one of those teams mentioned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the reputation and connections to schools. Otherwise, it’s just like all the other dysfunctional clubs.

Connection to the school doesn't mean much when you don't have the players to back it up. Schools aren't going to do Capital any favors if the players are not up to par.

Fair Point. If your kid is trying to play for a top 10 school, then absolutely they need to be elite athletes and players. Very few Capital players are playing at UNC, BC, Northwestern, etc. However, as you go through the process and get past the top 10, it's not as much about lacrosse skills as one might think. High School, GPA, Club team, nice/intelligent kid, family or club connections, wealth, etc. all play a factor. If the kid can't catch, it's a non starter, but you'd be surprised how many just "OK" kids get courted by some very good universities/lacrosse programs.

Don’t see any Hero’s players on the rosters of UNC, BC or Northwestern. No M&D players at Northwestern (Capital has one). M&D has two at BC (Capital has one) and three at UNC (two without nepotism influence). Capital has one at UNC. MD once dominated the top teams but look at any of the rosters of the power house programs and the fact is that NY and Mass make up the vast majority of the juggernauts today.

M&D places girls at better lacrosse schools than Capital. You could argue Capital places girls at better academic schools. Hero's is hit or miss depending on class.

Heroes is so hit or miss right?

https://iwlca.sportsrecruits.com/committed/heros

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the reputation and connections to schools. Otherwise, it’s just like all the other dysfunctional clubs.

Connection to the school doesn't mean much when you don't have the players to back it up. Schools aren't going to do Capital any favors if the players are not up to par.

Fair Point. If your kid is trying to play for a top 10 school, then absolutely they need to be elite athletes and players. Very few Capital players are playing at UNC, BC, Northwestern, etc. However, as you go through the process and get past the top 10, it's not as much about lacrosse skills as one might think. High School, GPA, Club team, nice/intelligent kid, family or club connections, wealth, etc. all play a factor. If the kid can't catch, it's a non starter, but you'd be surprised how many just "OK" kids get courted by some very good universities/lacrosse programs.

Don’t see any Hero’s players on the rosters of UNC, BC or Northwestern. No M&D players at Northwestern (Capital has one). M&D has two at BC (Capital has one) and three at UNC (two without nepotism influence). Capital has one at UNC. MD once dominated the top teams but look at any of the rosters of the power house programs and the fact is that NY and Mass make up the vast majority of the juggernauts today.

M&D places girls at better lacrosse schools than Capital. You could argue Capital places girls at better academic schools. Hero's is hit or miss depending on class.

Heroes is so hit or miss right?

https://iwlca.sportsrecruits.com/committed/heros

PP stated “very few Capital players are playing at UNC, BC, Northwestern”. Rosters show Capital has three at these schools. M&D has four (not counting nepotism influence). Hero’s has none.

[Anonymous]

Isn’t this entire discussion about who has influence and who does not? Influence is influence which is what everyone is looking for.