2029 Girls

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The top academic schools are top 25.

There are some very good academic options available outside the top 25. Arguably more so than on the men's side.

Womens RPI ranking 5/25/25:
26 Harvard
28 Brown
30 Cornell
31 Notre Dame
35 USC
53 Georgetown
58 Vanderbilt
64 BU
80 Columbia

https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/lacrosse-women/d1/ncaa-womens-lacrosse-rpi

Men's 25+
35 Penn
39 Brown

https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/lacrosse-men/d1/ncaa-mens-lacrosse-rpi

Three of the women’s D1 programs above are top 25 - keep up.

Ok, you got me! I clearly stated this was RPI and included the reference link. Are you adding anything of substance to this thread or just salt?

Well you keep making references to polls that mean absolutely nothing so I’m here for you.

https://www.espn.com/womens-college-lacrosse/rankings

Here are the final D1 rankings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You put more hours into any sport than shool work. Why not try to play at highest level?

Highest level for many is highest academic. Also, many have no desire to deal with big rosters, transfer portal competition and lots of 5th year grad transfers. Ivies do not allow 5th year and rarely use transfer portal. Players have their own personal goals which is not always a BC, UNC, Maryland type of school just because they do well in lax. Many players put in just as much hardwork for school work as they do for lax training. In fact for many the academics are way more important than the lax championship or ranking. You clearly do not have a high academic achieving student because you seem to be having a hard time wrapping your head around this idea.

Players finish a degree at an Ivy and transfer out to WIN a championship! Every player wants to win a championship whether they are at Harvard or Northwestern. You being unable to wrap your head around that shows your lack of intelligence AND athleticism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Capital Orange name their 2029 coaches?

Capital coaching seems to be falling off, but maybe that’s just coaching everywhere these days

True for all the DC clubs. Way too many clubs and not enough coaches

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You put more hours into any sport than shool work. Why not try to play at highest level?

Highest level for many is highest academic. Also, many have no desire to deal with big rosters, transfer portal competition and lots of 5th year grad transfers. Ivies do not allow 5th year and rarely use transfer portal. Players have their own personal goals which is not always a BC, UNC, Maryland type of school just because they do well in lax. Many players put in just as much hardwork for school work as they do for lax training. In fact for many the academics are way more important than the lax championship or ranking. You clearly do not have a high academic achieving student because you seem to be having a hard time wrapping your head around this idea.

Players finish a degree at an Ivy and transfer out to WIN a championship! Every player wants to win a championship whether they are at Harvard or Northwestern. You being unable to wrap your head around that shows your lack of intelligence AND athleticism.

Exactly – and that perfectly proves my point. Those players chose the Ivy League or high academic *first* for their undergrad degree: stability, no 5th years taking spots, and elite academics. Winning a championship *later* via a post grad transfer (often with a funded Master's degree-a brilliant move!) is a separate, opportunistic phase. It doesn't change the fact that during INITIAL recruitment, many top students specifically seek out environments like the Ivies precisely because they prioritize the undergrad academic experience and roster stability over immediately chasing a title. Both choices – starting at an Ivy and transferring for a post grad year – can be smart, strategic, and driven by different goals at different times.

[Anonymous]

You’re a clown

[Anonymous]

You’re talking like the majority of student athletes do a 5th year, but only a small percentage do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The top academic schools are top 25.

There are some very good academic options available outside the top 25. Arguably more so than on the men's side.

Womens RPI ranking 5/25/25:
26 Harvard
28 Brown
30 Cornell
31 Notre Dame
35 USC
53 Georgetown
58 Vanderbilt
64 BU
80 Columbia

https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/lacrosse-women/d1/ncaa-womens-lacrosse-rpi

Men's 25+
35 Penn
39 Brown

https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/lacrosse-men/d1/ncaa-mens-lacrosse-rpi

Three of the women’s D1 programs above are top 25 - keep up.

Ok, you got me! I clearly stated this was RPI and included the reference link. Are you adding anything of substance to this thread or just salt?

Well you keep making references to polls that mean absolutely nothing so I’m here for you.

https://www.espn.com/womens-college-lacrosse/rankings

Here are the final D1 rankings

Correctamondo. Confirms Inside Lacrosse rankings. Has nothing to do with RPI rankings.

[Anonymous]

And you were talking like every player should want to attend a school solely for the chance to win a national championship. Many players have different priorities and may not be interested in UNC, Maryland, or BC just because of their championship wins. I recently heard that a 2025 player decided to decommit from BC to Duke due to all the transfer portal adds. Personally, my child would prefer to attend an Ivy League school or a high academic institution over the three mentioned schools.