Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents

[Anonymous]

The even with be the conviction or death of Trump. If one or the other happens, Biden won't run.

It is pretty simple. No other democrat can beat Trump.

No other republican can beat Trump.

If the GOP would get rid of Trump, we could all move on with a "normal" election. Why won't the GOP get rid of him?

They had two chances to impeach and disqualify him, they have had several chances through the courts and they have the current primary season. And yet, the GOP won't get rid of him.

But sure, blame the democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The even with be the conviction or death of Trump. If one or the other happens, Biden won't run.

It is pretty simple. No other democrat can beat Trump.

No other republican can beat Trump.

If the GOP would get rid of Trump, we could all move on with a "normal" election. Why won't the GOP get rid of him?

They had two chances to impeach and disqualify him, they have had several chances through the courts and they have the current primary season. And yet, the GOP won't get rid of him.

But sure, blame the democrats.

No other president can have conversations with Kohl and Mitterrand!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only lying is from people who cannot accept that Biden has major cognitive issues. Continue to do so at your own political peril. Everyone knows it now. The main tact today was to attack the propriety of Huh including the details about Biden’s memory in his report. I note there were no denials with respect to the allegations. The press will now hammer him if they even let him out again which they will not nor will he debate.

And yet Biden has been more productive and more effective than any President since the New Deal despite a dysfunctional Congress and an obstructionist Supreme Court.

Are you high? Afghanistan withdrawal? Illegal immigration to a point where even Democratic Mayors are calling it a crisis? Inflation out of control? Corruption by engaging in his sons business deals? C’mon. Oh, and he is absolutely 100% senile.

He's the most qualified person in the COUNTRY to be president, he told us.

Sad thing is, even when he had his faculties everyone knew he was one of the dumbest members of congress.

Graduated next to last from his law school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only lying is from people who cannot accept that Biden has major cognitive issues. Continue to do so at your own political peril. Everyone knows it now. The main tact today was to attack the propriety of Huh including the details about Biden’s memory in his report. I note there were no denials with respect to the allegations. The press will now hammer him if they even let him out again which they will not nor will he debate.

And yet Biden has been more productive and more effective than any President since the New Deal despite a dysfunctional Congress and an obstructionist Supreme Court.

Are you high? Afghanistan withdrawal? Illegal immigration to a point where even Democratic Mayors are calling it a crisis? Inflation out of control? Corruption by engaging in his sons business deals? C’mon. Oh, and he is absolutely 100% senile.

He's the most qualified person in the COUNTRY to be president, he told us.

Sad thing is, even when he had his faculties everyone knew he was one of the dumbest members of congress.

Graduated next to last from his law school.

How many times was he forced to apologize for plagiarism?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only lying is from people who cannot accept that Biden has major cognitive issues. Continue to do so at your own political peril. Everyone knows it now. The main tact today was to attack the propriety of Huh including the details about Biden’s memory in his report. I note there were no denials with respect to the allegations. The press will now hammer him if they even let him out again which they will not nor will he debate.

And yet Biden has been more productive and more effective than any President since the New Deal despite a dysfunctional Congress and an obstructionist Supreme Court.

Are you high? Afghanistan withdrawal? Illegal immigration to a point where even Democratic Mayors are calling it a crisis? Inflation out of control? Corruption by engaging in his sons business deals? C’mon. Oh, and he is absolutely 100% senile.

He's the most qualified person in the COUNTRY to be president, he told us.

Sad thing is, even when he had his faculties everyone knew he was one of the dumbest members of congress.

Graduated next to last from his law school.

How many times was he forced to apologize for plagiarism?

At least 3 times that I remember in the last 3 decades. I think there was a plagiarism allegations while Biden was in law school.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

You do not need to show intent - mere possession of classified documents is legally sufficient for finding of guilt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do not need to show intent - mere possession of classified documents is legally sufficient for finding of guilt.

Nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only lying is from people who cannot accept that Biden has major cognitive issues. Continue to do so at your own political peril. Everyone knows it now. The main tact today was to attack the propriety of Huh including the details about Biden’s memory in his report. I note there were no denials with respect to the allegations. The press will now hammer him if they even let him out again which they will not nor will he debate.

And yet Biden has been more productive and more effective than any President since the New Deal despite a dysfunctional Congress and an obstructionist Supreme Court.

Are you high? Afghanistan withdrawal? Illegal immigration to a point where even Democratic Mayors are calling it a crisis? Inflation out of control? Corruption by engaging in his sons business deals? C’mon. Oh, and he is absolutely 100% senile.

He's the most qualified person in the COUNTRY to be president, he told us.

Sad thing is, even when he had his faculties everyone knew he was one of the dumbest members of congress.

Graduated next to last from his law school.

How many times was he forced to apologize for plagiarism?

At least 3 times that I remember in the last 3 decades. I think there was a plagiarism allegations while Biden was in law school.

Look here Jack. He’s under a lot of shininanavpreasure. Defending kids from corn pop takes a lot of time. So does forgetting when you served at VP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do not need to show intent - mere possession of classified documents is legally sufficient for finding of guilt.

Ok, so why isn't Trump in jail?

(hint: Judge Cannon is in the tank for him)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do not need to show intent - mere possession of classified documents is legally sufficient for finding of guilt.

Ok, so why isn't Trump in jail?

(hint: Judge Cannon is in the tank for him)

Trump actually has the Presidential Records Act as an argument.
Biden does not have that argument - especially as a Senator since some of the classified material dates back to his Senate days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do not need to show intent - mere possession of classified documents is legally sufficient for finding of guilt.

Go read 18 USC 1924. Pay attention to where you see the word “knowingly.” That is the intent element.

[Anonymous]

[list]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do not need to show intent - mere possession of classified documents is legally sufficient for finding of guilt.

Ok, so why isn't Trump in jail?

(hint: Judge Cannon is in the tank for him)

Trump actually has the Presidential Records Act as an argument.
Biden does not have that argument - especially as a Senator since some of the classified material dates back to his Senate days.

The PRA does not give a president the right to steal sensitive defense documents, or any other government document, after they leave office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do not need to show intent - mere possession of classified documents is legally sufficient for finding of guilt.

Ok, so why isn't Trump in jail?

(hint: Judge Cannon is in the tank for him)

Trump actually has the Presidential Records Act as an argument.
Biden does not have that argument - especially as a Senator since some of the classified material dates back to his Senate days.

Biden threw classified documents about the Afghanistan withdrawal by/on an old, broken down dog crate.


What the report includes:

The report covers what materials have been uncovered, what's known about how they were handled — going back to Biden's time as vice president — as well as the legal arguments around whether charges were appropriate.

There are photos of the boxes that contained classified materials, including one damaged box with documents about Afghanistan that was found in the garage of Biden's home in Delaware "near a collapsed dog crate, a dog bed, a Zappos box, an empty bucket, a broken lamp wrapped with duct tape, potting soil, and synthetic firewood."


The bulk of the report focuses on two types of classified materials — documents about military and foreign policy in Afghanistan; and notebooks that Biden used throughout his presidency for a combination of personal reflections, meeting notes and other writings.

Biden relied on his notebooks in particular while writing his memoir Promise Me, Dad, which was published in 2017 and reflects on the year his older son Beau died of cancer, two years earlier.

In conversations with his ghostwriter for the book, he read from those notebooks — and on at least three occasions shared classified material while doing so.

https://www.npr.org/2024/02/09/1230333392/biden-classified-documents-highlights#:~:text=There%20are%20photos%20of%20the,tape%2C%20potting%20soil%2C%20and%20synthetic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do not need to show intent - mere possession of classified documents is legally sufficient for finding of guilt.

Go read 18 USC 1924. Pay attention to where you see the word “knowingly.” That is the intent element.

I thought 'knowingly' didn't apply to Joe.