Hunter Biden indicted on nine tax charges, adding to gun charges in special counsel probe

[Anonymous]

So MAGA, what is the minimum you will accept on the verdict?

I anticipate guilt on 1 count of possession. Will that suffice? Or does it need to be a slam dunk?

What should the jury do? Since you are apparently running the show here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So MAGA, what is the minimum you will accept on the verdict?

I anticipate guilt on 1 count of possession. Will that suffice? Or does it need to be a slam dunk?

What should the jury do? Since you are apparently running the show here.

PP again, remember: JURIES decide verdicts. I’m sure you’ll claim the deep StaTe got to them if it’s not a slam dunk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So MAGA, what is the minimum you will accept on the verdict?

I anticipate guilt on 1 count of possession. Will that suffice? Or does it need to be a slam dunk?

What should the jury do? Since you are apparently running the show here.

PP again, remember: JURIES decide verdicts. I’m sure you’ll claim the deep StaTe got to them if it’s not a slam dunk.

But if they convict him, they'll have to explain how that could happen when Biden can so easily rig the system to convict Trump.

FWIW I would welcome a precedent setting result that can be applied to all the druggies who buy guns.

[Anonymous]

There’s no way the evidence is “beyond a reasonable doubt”, sorry MAGA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I honestly can't imagine Kathleen Buhle's daily 24/7 pain and stress being married to him.

You ain’t lying. Imagine what the children felt. It’s so very sad. And he got his brother’s widow hooked on crack. I mean addiction sucks but this guy has basically destroyed every relationship around him with his most important family members. I can’t imagine what his wife and kids and his brother’s kids went through. Losing your dad, and then your mom starts sleeping with your uncle and gets addicted to crack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I honestly can't imagine Kathleen Buhle's daily 24/7 pain and stress being married to him.

You ain’t lying. Imagine what the children felt. It’s so very sad. And he got his brother’s widow hooked on crack. I mean addiction sucks but this guy has basically destroyed every relationship around him with his most important family members. I can’t imagine what his wife and kids and his brother’s kids went through. Losing your dad, and then your mom starts sleeping with your uncle and gets addicted to crack.

And he has a 5yo he's never even met.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s no way the evidence is “beyond a reasonable doubt”, sorry MAGA.

I'm not MAGA but he literally admits to breaking the law in his book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I honestly can't imagine Kathleen Buhle's daily 24/7 pain and stress being married to him.

You ain’t lying. Imagine what the children felt. It’s so very sad. And he got his brother’s widow hooked on crack. I mean addiction sucks but this guy has basically destroyed every relationship around him with his most important family members. I can’t imagine what his wife and kids and his brother’s kids went through. Losing your dad, and then your mom starts sleeping with your uncle and gets addicted to crack.

And he has a 5yo he's never even met.

Seriously this is been messing his kids up and probably will their whole lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So MAGA, what is the minimum you will accept on the verdict?

I anticipate guilt on 1 count of possession. Will that suffice? Or does it need to be a slam dunk?

What should the jury do? Since you are apparently running the show here.

PP again, remember: JURIES decide verdicts. I’m sure you’ll claim the deep StaTe got to them if it’s not a slam dunk.

But if they convict him, they'll have to explain how that could happen when Biden can so easily rig the system to convict Trump.

FWIW I would welcome a precedent setting result that can be applied to all the druggies who buy guns.

I thought we had already answered multiple times that the issue is the potential charhes that were allowed to have the statute of limitations run out before the infamous plea deal that fell apart. This trial is a slap on the wrist for what should have been considered for Hunter and we aren’t fooled by it, regardless of the verdict here. And yes, no “druggies” should be getting guns, I guess left and right can finally agree?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s no way the evidence is “beyond a reasonable doubt”, sorry MAGA.

I'm not MAGA but he literally admits to breaking the law in his book.

and the texts and the bank withdrawals

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So MAGA, what is the minimum you will accept on the verdict?

I anticipate guilt on 1 count of possession. Will that suffice? Or does it need to be a slam dunk?

What should the jury do? Since you are apparently running the show here.

PP again, remember: JURIES decide verdicts. I’m sure you’ll claim the deep StaTe got to them if it’s not a slam dunk.

But if they convict him, they'll have to explain how that could happen when Biden can so easily rig the system to convict Trump.

FWIW I would welcome a precedent setting result that can be applied to all the druggies who buy guns.

I thought we had already answered multiple times that the issue is the potential charhes that were allowed to have the statute of limitations run out before the infamous plea deal that fell apart. This trial is a slap on the wrist for what should have been considered for Hunter and we aren’t fooled by it, regardless of the verdict here. And yes, no “druggies” should be getting guns, I guess left and right can finally agree?

Only druggies on the right can get guns. The lefitst druggies must be prosecuted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So MAGA, what is the minimum you will accept on the verdict?

I anticipate guilt on 1 count of possession. Will that suffice? Or does it need to be a slam dunk?

What should the jury do? Since you are apparently running the show here.

Has this been answered? Are you all gonna storm the LA courthouse if he’s acquitted/hung or only guilty on one account?

Or, if he’s found guilty on all accounts will you say the justice system works and accept Trumps verdict?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I honestly can't imagine Kathleen Buhle's daily 24/7 pain and stress being married to him.

You ain’t lying. Imagine what the children felt. It’s so very sad. And he got his brother’s widow hooked on crack. I mean addiction sucks but this guy has basically destroyed every relationship around him with his most important family members. I can’t imagine what his wife and kids and his brother’s kids went through. Losing your dad, and then your mom starts sleeping with your uncle and gets addicted to crack.

I’m no HB fan but his sister in law had agency in this.

Drug addiction is so, so awful. Losing a parent is so awful, losing a brother (after losing a parent) is so awful. Lots of tragedy all around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So MAGA, what is the minimum you will accept on the verdict?

I anticipate guilt on 1 count of possession. Will that suffice? Or does it need to be a slam dunk?

What should the jury do? Since you are apparently running the show here.

PP again, remember: JURIES decide verdicts. I’m sure you’ll claim the deep StaTe got to them if it’s not a slam dunk.

But if they convict him, they'll have to explain how that could happen when Biden can so easily rig the system to convict Trump.

FWIW I would welcome a precedent setting result that can be applied to all the druggies who buy guns.

I thought we had already answered multiple times that the issue is the potential charhes that were allowed to have the statute of limitations run out before the infamous plea deal that fell apart. This trial is a slap on the wrist for what should have been considered for Hunter and we aren’t fooled by it, regardless of the verdict here. And yes, no “druggies” should be getting guns, I guess left and right can finally agree?

Sure. Let’s do Don Jr. next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So MAGA, what is the minimum you will accept on the verdict?

I anticipate guilt on 1 count of possession. Will that suffice? Or does it need to be a slam dunk?

What should the jury do? Since you are apparently running the show here.

PP again, remember: JURIES decide verdicts. I’m sure you’ll claim the deep StaTe got to them if it’s not a slam dunk.

But if they convict him, they'll have to explain how that could happen when Biden can so easily rig the system to convict Trump.

FWIW I would welcome a precedent setting result that can be applied to all the druggies who buy guns.

I thought we had already answered multiple times that the issue is the potential charhes that were allowed to have the statute of limitations run out before the infamous plea deal that fell apart. This trial is a slap on the wrist for what should have been considered for Hunter and we aren’t fooled by it, regardless of the verdict here. And yes, no “druggies” should be getting guns, I guess left and right can finally agree?

Sure. Let’s do Don Jr. next.

I don’t doubt for a second that we are now caught in a vicious cycle of political lawfare following the NY case.