Speaker of the House Vote Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McCarthy now has the votes. he will be speaker tomorrow after the first vote

Source?

No way the Freedom Caucus will vote for K.Mc and without those votes, he doesn't have a majority.

So why wouldn't McCarthy just wait them out? Nobody else is even close to having as many votes. Well, except Jeffries.

Apparently, McCarthy does not believe his lying eyes and ears. I hope they keep voting until the azaleas are in bloom in Antarctica.

Nice visual. I might steal it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they lower the threshold too much, Jeffries is elected

So how many Rs need to be 'present' for that fantasy to come true?

12. That would reduce the winning threshold to 212.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That "present" vote was a previous McCarthy vote

So PP can keep his or her day job, because Donald didn’t get any previous McCarthy votes.

Aren't there 20 for Donalds and there were 19 for Jordan yesterday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That "present" vote was a previous McCarthy vote

Was it a moderate Republican? Because voting present is essentially voting for Jeffries, since he's so close to the threshold.

It was Victoria Sparzt from Indiana. She's Ukraine born, and maybe is hedging her bets since MAGA wants to cut off aid. Doubt is was about lowering the threshold since she didn't vote in the initial round and it was clear Kevin didn't have the votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they lower the threshold too much, Jeffries is elected

So how many Rs need to be 'present' for that fantasy to come true?

5 more.

No, 11 more. You need a majority of those voting. There are 434 members-elect. If 12 vote vote present, then a majority is 212 (which is Jeffries' vote total). If only 6 vote present, then a majority is 215.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That "present" vote was a previous McCarthy vote

Was it a moderate Republican? Because voting present is essentially voting for Jeffries, since he's so close to the threshold.

It was Victoria Sparzt from Indiana. She's Ukraine born, and maybe is hedging her bets since MAGA wants to cut off aid. Doubt is was about lowering the threshold since she didn't vote in the initial round and it was clear Kevin didn't have the votes.

She's eyeing Indiana Senate primary.

[Anonymous]

That Santos guy should vote "present" just to get some attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they lower the threshold too much, Jeffries is elected

So how many Rs need to be 'present' for that fantasy to come true?

5 more.

Maybe not. I am bad at math and this is math twice - it is 12.

[Anonymous]

I should learn how to read lips. These close ups on c-span are really close.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That Santos guy should vote "present" just to get some attention.

He needs more?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That Santos guy should vote "present" just to get some attention.

He needs more?

ok, relevance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That "present" vote was a previous McCarthy vote

So PP can keep his or her day job, because Donald didn’t get any previous McCarthy votes.

Aren't there 20 for Donalds and there were 19 for Jordan yesterday?

The third vote yesterday had 20 Rs not for McCarthy. The first two had 19 Rs not for McCarthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I should learn how to read lips. These close ups on c-span are really close.

Something interesting I read about this yesterday, after the speaker takes control, the Republicans will control the C-SPAN cameras, and we won’t get the same camera work including the pans all over and the closeups.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I should learn how to read lips. These close ups on c-span are really close.

Something interesting I read about this yesterday, after the speaker takes control, the Republicans will control the C-SPAN cameras, and we won’t get the same camera work including the pans all over and the closeups.

Link please?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I should learn how to read lips. These close ups on c-span are really close.

Something interesting I read about this yesterday, after the speaker takes control, the Republicans will control the C-SPAN cameras, and we won’t get the same camera work including the pans all over and the closeups.

This is correct. This is why we are getting some great shots.