RW vs LW news

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Checking in with that “liberal New York Times”

The GOP’s working the refs has paid dividends for them.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Utterly ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

God I love Coulter That’s hilarious

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

God I love Coulter That’s hilarious

Really? She's awful and seems deeply unpleasant and unhappy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

God I love Coulter That’s hilarious

Really? She's awful and seems deeply unpleasant and unhappy.

I'm conservative and I agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

God I love Coulter That’s hilarious

So the handwringing about people protesting the overturning of Roe outside the religious extremists’ houses seems like maybe you didn’t care, you were only trying to score points. Because this isn’t funny. Do I need to the post the link to “Some More News”’s explainer of why Republicans don’t have a sense of humor? It certainly applies.

[Anonymous]

This is fabulous. This WaPo reporter, "Emily," struggles to justify her story and her pre-conceived opinion about Dave Portnoy.
He will not let her off the hook. She reveals her slimy tactics in the conversation.......
Saying something negative about a subject to someone else in order to get engagement from them.
It is worth the watch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is fabulous. This WaPo reporter, "Emily," struggles to justify her story and her pre-conceived opinion about Dave Portnoy.
He will not let her off the hook. She reveals her slimy tactics in the conversation.......
Saying something negative about a subject to someone else in order to get engagement from them.
It is worth the watch.

I want my 12 minutes back. Dear fellow sane readers of DCUM, it is not fabulous, unless you consider hearing Dave Portnoy mispronounce "misogynistic" about a dozen times to be fabulous. All this reveals is that he does not understand how reporting works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is fabulous. This WaPo reporter, "Emily," struggles to justify her story and her pre-conceived opinion about Dave Portnoy.
He will not let her off the hook. She reveals her slimy tactics in the conversation.......
Saying something negative about a subject to someone else in order to get engagement from them.
It is worth the watch.

I want my 12 minutes back. Dear fellow sane readers of DCUM, it is not fabulous, unless you consider hearing Dave Portnoy mispronounce "misogynistic" about a dozen times to be fabulous. All this reveals is that he does not understand how reporting works.

Ha ha. Sure. The reporter was squirming. She claimed not to have said negative things about Portnoy and once her read to her HER WORDS, she started stammering.

Follow up.....
Not surprising. And, mind you.... 10:00 was the time SHE suggested.

[Anonymous]

Right wing "investigative journalism" is trash and ultimately collapses under the weight of its own corruption.

[Anonymous]

Left-wing is The Nation or In These Times or The Intercept. Not the NYT, NPR, MSNBC, CNN etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Left-wing is The Nation or In These Times or The Intercept. Not the NYT, NPR, MSNBC, CNN etc.

LOL. Sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is fabulous. This WaPo reporter, "Emily," struggles to justify her story and her pre-conceived opinion about Dave Portnoy.
He will not let her off the hook. She reveals her slimy tactics in the conversation.......
Saying something negative about a subject to someone else in order to get engagement from them.
It is worth the watch.

I want my 12 minutes back. Dear fellow sane readers of DCUM, it is not fabulous, unless you consider hearing Dave Portnoy mispronounce "misogynistic" about a dozen times to be fabulous. All this reveals is that he does not understand how reporting works.

Ha ha. Sure. The reporter was squirming. She claimed not to have said negative things about Portnoy and once her read to her HER WORDS, she started stammering.

Follow up.....
Not surprising. And, mind you.... 10:00 was the time SHE suggested.

Squirming? He kept asking to see the article (before it was reported and written!) and she kept saying it hasn't been written yet and she wanted to talk to him. How on Earth is that squirming? Only someone completely snowed by the right-wing propaganda machine would think this is some kind of 'own' of 'dishonest' 'left wing reporters' by Portnoy.

I have had to reschedule meetings and appointments I have proposed before. It's honestly bizarre that you think it's evidence of shady behavior (and Portnoy has no idea what could possibly be more important? Does he not realize that journalists juggle multiple projects at once and the world does not revolve around him?).

I'm sure Portnoy felt like a big important boy when he stuck to his guns 10:00 AM or nothing, though! LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is fabulous. This WaPo reporter, "Emily," struggles to justify her story and her pre-conceived opinion about Dave Portnoy.
He will not let her off the hook. She reveals her slimy tactics in the conversation.......
Saying something negative about a subject to someone else in order to get engagement from them.
It is worth the watch.

I want my 12 minutes back. Dear fellow sane readers of DCUM, it is not fabulous, unless you consider hearing Dave Portnoy mispronounce "misogynistic" about a dozen times to be fabulous. All this reveals is that he does not understand how reporting works.

Ha ha. Sure. The reporter was squirming. She claimed not to have said negative things about Portnoy and once her read to her HER WORDS, she started stammering.

Follow up.....
Not surprising. And, mind you.... 10:00 was the time SHE suggested.

Squirming? He kept asking to see the article (before it was reported and written!) and she kept saying it hasn't been written yet and she wanted to talk to him. How on Earth is that squirming? Only someone completely snowed by the right-wing propaganda machine would think this is some kind of 'own' of 'dishonest' 'left wing reporters' by Portnoy.

I have had to reschedule meetings and appointments I have proposed before. It's honestly bizarre that you think it's evidence of shady behavior (and Portnoy has no idea what could possibly be more important? Does he not realize that journalists juggle multiple projects at once and the world does not revolve around him?).

I'm sure Portnoy felt like a big important boy when he stuck to his guns 10:00 AM or nothing, though! LOL

Thank you for watching so we didn’t have to. Cons are so easily manipulated.