Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's contribution to Epstein the degenerate's birthday book was sickening!

Melania was probably trafficked herself. Her "genius" visa makes no sense, and her modeling "agent" has a record of trafficking women from eastern European countries, including supplying underage women. He was a close associate of Trump & his best buddy Epstein.

What was the check in the birthday book? It references something about Trump paying money…. Was some reference to Melania?

That photo was taken at mar-a-lago around the time he'd begun dating her. It was presented to the book by a long time club member. They are mocking trump and that seems to be the explanation. Obviously there were many things going on in Epstein's orbit, but a tall woman who can't even pass for underage is fully deprecated in his ledger.

Eeewww. Depreciated because she was what age….. 28 or something? Disgusting.

Deprecated is a disgusting phrase for any reason. There were similar awful things in the emails, rejecting much younger marks.

This is a much later exchange about another potential recruit between, percolating up through assistants for approval:

Sourcing & screening: Maxwell and selected associates identified prospects through social circles and schools. Emails from Natalya (“Natasha”) Malyshev to Epstein carried first names, ages and photos; one message proposed a 19-year-old who could “be rewarded” for recruiting classmates. Epstein responded that she was “too big,” adding instructions (“no nail polish”) if a meeting went ahead.

The dot dot dots after "easy-going" caught my eye. An important characteristic for someone they want to control who will go along with whatever they want to do to/with her?

What dod Trump say he wanted to rid the country of when he announced his run for president?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's contribution to Epstein the degenerate's birthday book was sickening!

Melania was probably trafficked herself. Her "genius" visa makes no sense, and her modeling "agent" has a record of trafficking women from eastern European countries, including supplying underage women. He was a close associate of Trump & his best buddy Epstein.

What was the check in the birthday book? It references something about Trump paying money…. Was some reference to Melania?

That photo was taken at mar-a-lago around the time he'd begun dating her. It was presented to the book by a long time club member. They are mocking trump and that seems to be the explanation. Obviously there were many things going on in Epstein's orbit, but a tall woman who can't even pass for underage is fully deprecated in his ledger.

Eeewww. Depreciated because she was what age….. 28 or something? Disgusting.

Deprecated is a disgusting phrase for any reason. There were similar awful things in the emails, rejecting much younger marks.

This is a much later exchange about another potential recruit between, percolating up through assistants for approval:

Sourcing & screening: Maxwell and selected associates identified prospects through social circles and schools. Emails from Natalya (“Natasha”) Malyshev to Epstein carried first names, ages and photos; one message proposed a 19-year-old who could “be rewarded” for recruiting classmates. Epstein responded that she was “too big,” adding instructions (“no nail polish”) if a meeting went ahead.

The dot dot dots after "easy-going" caught my eye. An important characteristic for someone they want to control who will go along with whatever they want to do to/with her?

What dod Trump say he wanted to rid the country of when he announced his run for president?

Trump announced his candidacy for president with statements of “They’re bringing crime. They’re bringing rapists.”

Who knew this was actually an announcement to Trump’s preferred approach as leader of GOP.
Clearly Trump , as is appropriate to a successful leader, wanted first to model what it is to be a convicted felon and rapist. So could clear a path for those convicted of such things.

[Anonymous]

Can the WSJ counter sue Trump for lying about the drawing? Trump claimed it didn’t exist. But, it clearly does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's contribution to Epstein the degenerate's birthday book was sickening!

Melania was probably trafficked herself. Her "genius" visa makes no sense, and her modeling "agent" has a record of trafficking women from eastern European countries, including supplying underage women. He was a close associate of Trump & his best buddy Epstein.

What was the check in the birthday book? It references something about Trump paying money…. Was some reference to Melania?

That photo was taken at mar-a-lago around the time he'd begun dating her. It was presented to the book by a long time club member. They are mocking trump and that seems to be the explanation. Obviously there were many things going on in Epstein's orbit, but a tall woman who can't even pass for underage is fully deprecated in his ledger.

Eeewww. Depreciated because she was what age….. 28 or something? Disgusting.

Deprecated is a disgusting phrase for any reason. There were similar awful things in the emails, rejecting much younger marks.

This is a much later exchange about another potential recruit between, percolating up through assistants for approval:

Sourcing & screening: Maxwell and selected associates identified prospects through social circles and schools. Emails from Natalya (“Natasha”) Malyshev to Epstein carried first names, ages and photos; one message proposed a 19-year-old who could “be rewarded” for recruiting classmates. Epstein responded that she was “too big,” adding instructions (“no nail polish”) if a meeting went ahead.

The dot dot dots after "easy-going" caught my eye. An important characteristic for someone they want to control who will go along with whatever they want to do to/with her?

The assistants are pitching this girl as a recruiter, yes they spot that she will go along. I find the rejection and the 'no nail polish' the creepiest, no hint of personal agency or adulthood allowed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's contribution to Epstein the degenerate's birthday book was sickening!

Melania was probably trafficked herself. Her "genius" visa makes no sense, and her modeling "agent" has a record of trafficking women from eastern European countries, including supplying underage women. He was a close associate of Trump & his best buddy Epstein.

What was the check in the birthday book? It references something about Trump paying money…. Was some reference to Melania?

That photo was taken at mar-a-lago around the time he'd begun dating her. It was presented to the book by a long time club member. They are mocking trump and that seems to be the explanation. Obviously there were many things going on in Epstein's orbit, but a tall woman who can't even pass for underage is fully deprecated in his ledger.

Eeewww. Depreciated because she was what age….. 28 or something? Disgusting.

Deprecated is a disgusting phrase for any reason. There were similar awful things in the emails, rejecting much younger marks.

This is a much later exchange about another potential recruit between, percolating up through assistants for approval:

Sourcing & screening: Maxwell and selected associates identified prospects through social circles and schools. Emails from Natalya (“Natasha”) Malyshev to Epstein carried first names, ages and photos; one message proposed a 19-year-old who could “be rewarded” for recruiting classmates. Epstein responded that she was “too big,” adding instructions (“no nail polish”) if a meeting went ahead.

The dot dot dots after "easy-going" caught my eye. An important characteristic for someone they want to control who will go along with whatever they want to do to/with her?

The assistants are pitching this girl as a recruiter, yes they spot that she will go along. I find the rejection and the 'no nail polish' the creepiest, no hint of personal agency or adulthood allowed.

Is this from the Epstein emails?

[Anonymous]

I suggest all men ask the women in their lives - you know your girlfriends, wives, daughters, moms, sisters - how safe they would feel being alone in a room with a man who said “grab them by the pu$$y”.

Follow that up by asking whether this woman in your life might consider this statement to be inflammatory or threatening.

Then feickin listen to the answer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Julie K Brown (Miami Herald reporter) is on the Daily Beast podcast and brought up an interesting point:

During her trial, Maxwell's defense was that the entire cases was fake, a creation of the media and lying girls and rapacious lawyers. She did not testify in her own trial. So how can she provide any information now to the DoJ if the entire saga was a fabrication?

This was a good, short interview. I keep learning new elements of case whenever Julie K Brown speaks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqR2N3Wv3Ws

I listened to that as well, and another good point she made is that Todd Blanche doesn’t know anything about the case and they should have sent line prosecutors (like Maurene Comey but oops they fired her) to interview Maxwell instead of the guy who is still currently in an attorney-client relationship with Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's contribution to Epstein the degenerate's birthday book was sickening!

Melania was probably trafficked herself. Her "genius" visa makes no sense, and her modeling "agent" has a record of trafficking women from eastern European countries, including supplying underage women. He was a close associate of Trump & his best buddy Epstein.

What was the check in the birthday book? It references something about Trump paying money…. Was some reference to Melania?

That photo was taken at mar-a-lago around the time he'd begun dating her. It was presented to the book by a long time club member. They are mocking trump and that seems to be the explanation. Obviously there were many things going on in Epstein's orbit, but a tall woman who can't even pass for underage is fully deprecated in his ledger.

Eeewww. Depreciated because she was what age….. 28 or something? Disgusting.

Deprecated is a disgusting phrase for any reason. There were similar awful things in the emails, rejecting much younger marks.

This is a much later exchange about another potential recruit between, percolating up through assistants for approval:

Sourcing & screening: Maxwell and selected associates identified prospects through social circles and schools. Emails from Natalya (“Natasha”) Malyshev to Epstein carried first names, ages and photos; one message proposed a 19-year-old who could “be rewarded” for recruiting classmates. Epstein responded that she was “too big,” adding instructions (“no nail polish”) if a meeting went ahead.

The dot dot dots after "easy-going" caught my eye. An important characteristic for someone they want to control who will go along with whatever they want to do to/with her?

The assistants are pitching this girl as a recruiter, yes they spot that she will go along. I find the rejection and the 'no nail polish' the creepiest, no hint of personal agency or adulthood allowed.

Is this from the Epstein emails?

Yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I suggest all men ask the women in their lives - you know your girlfriends, wives, daughters, moms, sisters - how safe they would feel being alone in a room with a man who said “grab them by the pu$$y”.

Follow that up by asking whether this woman in your life might consider this statement to be inflammatory or threatening.

Then feickin listen to the answer.

If Trump said that out loud in a TV interview…imagine what he might do in private. Imagine what might be in the files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Julie K Brown (Miami Herald reporter) is on the Daily Beast podcast and brought up an interesting point:

During her trial, Maxwell's defense was that the entire cases was fake, a creation of the media and lying girls and rapacious lawyers. She did not testify in her own trial. So how can she provide any information now to the DoJ if the entire saga was a fabrication?

This was a good, short interview. I keep learning new elements of case whenever Julie K Brown speaks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqR2N3Wv3Ws

I listened to that as well, and another good point she made is that Todd Blanche doesn’t know anything about the case and they should have sent line prosecutors (like Maurene Comey but oops they fired her) to interview Maxwell instead of the guy who is still currently in an attorney-client relationship with Trump.

Hope the Post covers this story too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Julie K Brown (Miami Herald reporter) is on the Daily Beast podcast and brought up an interesting point:

During her trial, Maxwell's defense was that the entire cases was fake, a creation of the media and lying girls and rapacious lawyers. She did not testify in her own trial. So how can she provide any information now to the DoJ if the entire saga was a fabrication?

This was a good, short interview. I keep learning new elements of case whenever Julie K Brown speaks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqR2N3Wv3Ws

I listened to that as well, and another good point she made is that Todd Blanche doesn’t know anything about the case and they should have sent line prosecutors (like Maurene Comey but oops they fired her) to interview Maxwell instead of the guy who is still currently in an attorney-client relationship with Trump.

Hope the Post covers this story too.

I hope she wins.

[Anonymous]

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/15/maurene-comey-firing-lawsuit-00564029

NEW YORK — Maurene Comey, a longtime federal prosecutor who handled the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases, on Monday sued the Trump administration over her July firing for which she was given no explanation.

Comey, the daughter of former FBI director and Trump foe James Comey, in the lawsuit alleged her termination was “unlawful and unconstitutional,” and described it as unmerited, saying it occurred one day after the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office asked her to take the lead on a “major public corruption case” and three months after she earned an “Outstanding” performance review.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Julie K Brown (Miami Herald reporter) is on the Daily Beast podcast and brought up an interesting point:

During her trial, Maxwell's defense was that the entire cases was fake, a creation of the media and lying girls and rapacious lawyers. She did not testify in her own trial. So how can she provide any information now to the DoJ if the entire saga was a fabrication?

This was a good, short interview. I keep learning new elements of case whenever Julie K Brown speaks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqR2N3Wv3Ws

I listened to that as well, and another good point she made is that Todd Blanche doesn’t know anything about the case and they should have sent line prosecutors (like Maurene Comey but oops they fired her) to interview Maxwell instead of the guy who is still currently in an attorney-client relationship with Trump.

Hope the Post covers this story too.

Post has the story now too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/15/maurene-comey-firing-lawsuit-00564029

NEW YORK — Maurene Comey, a longtime federal prosecutor who handled the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases, on Monday sued the Trump administration over her July firing for which she was given no explanation.

Comey, the daughter of former FBI director and Trump foe James Comey, in the lawsuit alleged her termination was “unlawful and unconstitutional,” and described it as unmerited, saying it occurred one day after the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office asked her to take the lead on a “major public corruption case” and three months after she earned an “Outstanding” performance review.

Hope she wins. I hope others file suit as well.

[Anonymous]

👀

one day after the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office asked her to take the lead on a “major public corruption case”