Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Epstein Files"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]Trump's contribution to Epstein the degenerate's birthday book was sickening![/b] Melania was probably trafficked herself. Her "genius" visa makes no sense, and her modeling "agent" has a record of trafficking women from eastern European countries, including supplying underage women. He was a close associate of Trump & his best buddy Epstein.[/quote] What was the check in the birthday book? It references something about Trump paying money…. Was some reference to Melania? [/quote] That photo was taken at mar-a-lago around the time he'd begun dating her. It was presented to the book by a long time club member. They are mocking trump and that seems to be the explanation. Obviously there were many things going on in Epstein's orbit, but a tall woman who can't even pass for underage is [i]fully deprecated[/i] in his ledger. [/quote] Eeewww. Depreciated because she was what age….. 28 or something? Disgusting. [/quote] Deprecated is a disgusting phrase for any reason. There were similar awful things in the emails, rejecting much younger marks. This is a much later exchange about another potential recruit between, percolating up through assistants for approval: [img]https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_mobile/public/inline-images/irina.jpg[/img] [quote]Sourcing & screening: Maxwell and selected associates identified prospects through social circles and schools. Emails from Natalya (“Natasha”) Malyshev to Epstein carried first names, ages and photos; one message proposed a 19-year-old who could “be rewarded” for recruiting classmates. Epstein responded that she was “too big,” adding instructions (“no nail polish”) if a meeting went ahead.[/quote] [/quote] The dot dot dots after "easy-going" caught my eye. An important characteristic for someone they want to control who will go along with whatever they want to do to/with her? [/quote] The assistants are pitching this girl as a recruiter, yes they spot that she will go along. I find the rejection and the 'no nail polish' the creepiest, no hint of personal agency or adulthood allowed.[/quote] Is this from the Epstein emails? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics