Princess Charlene of Monaco What the Heck is happening with her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I hope not. Albert let his then fiancé put her son in the servant quarters. That’s unforgivable. Especially because it’s not like she had Alex when he was with her. Charlene literally dated someone with kids and chose to treat him that way.

You only have his mother's words to vouch for that. Hardly a disinterested party. I personally would have trouble trusting the person who left her older children to their father to focus on the younger golden goose. You don't think she was with Albert on account of his sparkling personality, do you.

Not sure what you're talking about unless you're confusing her with Charlene who abandoned her children. Nicole only has one child and she's always fought for him.

Nicole has two older children, who she left with their father.

Link?

It's common knowledge but if you insist: https://news.in-24.com/lifestyle/celebrities/77115.html

I'm sure you believe it's true love.

According to the newspaper Young Africa, it all began on July 13, 1997 aboard a Paris-Nice flight. The prince and Nicole sympathize. “She offers him her meal tray, he asks for her phone number – and gets it. “This is the start of their love story which would have lasted almost six years before she got pregnant. Mother of two other children, whose custody is entrusted to their father, Nicole Coste fights for the survival of her son in fragile health that must be hospitalized for six weeks after birth. « I faced this on my own, without confiding in anyone », Told the young woman to a journalist from Paris Match when the existence of the “secret child” is revealed.

Not true.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10169267/amp/Prince-Albert-Monaco-reveals-furious-interview-given-mother-love-child.html

«In the almost two decades since the 2005 interview, Nicole has raised Alexandre and his older half-brothers in Geneva, London and New York, and chosen to stay largely out of the spotlight.

However she is now firmly back in the public eye after she and Alexandre attended Monaco's glittering Rose Ball alongside Albert and other members of the royal family, and marked the teenager's 18th birthday with a lavish bash thrown by his royal father. »

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s planning something - slow rollout similar to Camilla. The National Ceremony is a big deal.

Her son and Albert’s other daughter is spending more time with the twins than Charlene is at home.

You know what time it is.

Prince Albert has been ramping up Nicole Coste’s appearances at the most important and exclusive events for a couple of years now.

Personally, I like them together. Racist Monegasque institutions haven’t been able to break their bond.

Yep, seeing the same thing. Monaco is the size of a postage stamp - you can't keep anything secret so might as well be open.

What do you think they tell the kids?

I doubt the kids care very much that the woman who has been at their father’s side their entire lives is now officially displacing a mother they hardly ever see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I hope not. Albert let his then fiancé put her son in the servant quarters. That’s unforgivable. Especially because it’s not like she had Alex when he was with her. Charlene literally dated someone with kids and chose to treat him that way.

You only have his mother's words to vouch for that. Hardly a disinterested party. I personally would have trouble trusting the person who left her older children to their father to focus on the younger golden goose. You don't think she was with Albert on account of his sparkling personality, do you.

Not just her word. There’s also the fact that Albert described Nicole’s comments as inappropriate and not inaccurate. It would be one thing if he didn’t comment at all…

Also Charlene isn’t with him for his sparkling personality either, also left her children with their father, and is additionally despised by his family and friends.

Well he married one but not the other so there's that.

This is why Nicole’s triumph is even sweeter. Race is why a mentally unstable white woman over the black woman he has always loved. But plot twist! He refused to leave Nicole and they will probably end up like Charles and Camilla.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I hope not. Albert let his then fiancé put her son in the servant quarters. That’s unforgivable. Especially because it’s not like she had Alex when he was with her. Charlene literally dated someone with kids and chose to treat him that way.

You only have his mother's words to vouch for that. Hardly a disinterested party. I personally would have trouble trusting the person who left her older children to their father to focus on the younger golden goose. You don't think she was with Albert on account of his sparkling personality, do you.

Not just her word. There’s also the fact that Albert described Nicole’s comments as inappropriate and not inaccurate. It would be one thing if he didn’t comment at all…

Also Charlene isn’t with him for his sparkling personality either, also left her children with their father, and is additionally despised by his family and friends.

Well he married one but not the other so there's that.

This is why Nicole’s triumph is even sweeter. Race is why a mentally unstable white woman over the black woman he has always loved. But plot twist! He refused to leave Nicole and they will probably end up like Charles and Camilla.

Yes he loved her so much he kept making babies with other women and screwing everything that moves.

[Anonymous]

Lets be real. The kids are raised by nannies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I doubt the kids care very much that the woman who has been at their father’s side their entire lives is now officially displacing a mother they hardly ever see.

Women only care for their own children. Depend upon it that if there was a button Nicole could press to make Charlene's children die a painful death and have her son named as a legitimate heir, she'd do it yesterday.

It must burn her to see that Charlene's children are princes and hers isn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I doubt the kids care very much that the woman who has been at their father’s side their entire lives is now officially displacing a mother they hardly ever see.

Women only care for their own children. Depend upon it that if there was a button Nicole could press to make Charlene's children die a painful death and have her son named as a legitimate heir, she'd do it yesterday.

It must burn her to see that Charlene's children are princes and hers isn't.

They do? Then where's Charlene?

[Anonymous]

There are some kind of unhinged people in this thread.

That said, I wonder if she's back in Monaco to negotiate some sort of settlement to end all this mess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I doubt the kids care very much that the woman who has been at their father’s side their entire lives is now officially displacing a mother they hardly ever see.

Women only care for their own children. Depend upon it that if there was a button Nicole could press to make Charlene's children die a painful death and have her son named as a legitimate heir, she'd do it yesterday.

It must burn her to see that Charlene's children are princes and hers isn't.

They do? Then where's Charlene?

Charlene is not well. It is obvious to anyone with eyes.

I don't think you can argue Nicole cares for Charlene's kids.

[Anonymous]

And I mean "cares for" as in "loves", not that she's changing their nappies. I think it burns her that they are "legitimate princes".

[Anonymous]

I will say, though, that Charlene never really looked happy in her role. All her photos look like lamb led to the slaughter.

[Anonymous]

When dad dies, can Jacques toss out the mistress and her kid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When dad dies, can Jacques toss out the mistress and her kid?

Toss out from where? He's not in the line of succession. I would think that there already exists a generous financial provision for him, as for all of Albert's other love children. Whether she'd be invited to formal events would of course be up to the current prince.

Although I understand Albert's sister is quite keen to have more power than anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And I mean "cares for" as in "loves", not that she's changing their nappies. I think it burns her that they are "legitimate princes".

I doubt she cares - if this follows through - she'll be in a much better position that Camilla. Better looking, younger, the 'Queen' to Albert's 'Prince' and on top of that - they share a child who is already treated well and elevated. If they marry, Albert could legitimize and title the kid and no one would blink. (Note - the kid will never be heir and that's fine. He's got a billionaire royal dad who loves him and adores his mother)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And I mean "cares for" as in "loves", not that she's changing their nappies. I think it burns her that they are "legitimate princes".

I doubt she cares - if this follows through - she'll be in a much better position that Camilla. Better looking, younger, the 'Queen' to Albert's 'Prince' and on top of that - they share a child who is already treated well and elevated. If they marry, Albert could legitimize and title the kid and no one would blink. (Note - the kid will never be heir and that's fine. He's got a billionaire royal dad who loves him and adores his mother)

You have a very active fantasy life.

He adored his mother so much he kept sleeping and making babies with other women.