Belle Burden’s “Strangers”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obvious the New Yorker article was planted by her ex husband and his PR team. Masterful rebuttal of her smear campaign against him.

It’s not gaining much traction though.

Because even if you try to unfairly take half of your spouse's family money, and she remains rich, it's still a scummy thing to do when the cheating spouse has kept all his income during the life of a 20 year marriage.

And he's always going to be the ultimate pig for abandoning his 3 kids without a backwards glance.

You realize she kept all her income, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whatever the financial shenanigans in this sordid divorce drama, a man who chooses to cut ties with his minor children deserves to be called out for that.

He got an apartment across the street.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obvious the New Yorker article was planted by her ex husband and his PR team. Masterful rebuttal of her smear campaign against him.

It’s not gaining much traction though.

Because even if you try to unfairly take half of your spouse's family money, and she remains rich, it's still a scummy thing to do when the cheating spouse has kept all his income during the life of a 20 year marriage.

And he's always going to be the ultimate pig for abandoning his 3 kids without a backwards glance.

You realize she kept all her income, right?

You don't seem to have read her book, if you don't realize she basically had no income for 20 years because she stayed home raising their 3 kids (despite having equally strong academic credentials as her spouse.) Do you not realize that this was unrenumerated labor she provided to their children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obvious the New Yorker article was planted by her ex husband and his PR team. Masterful rebuttal of her smear campaign against him.

It’s not gaining much traction though.

Because even if you try to unfairly take half of your spouse's family money, and she remains rich, it's still a scummy thing to do when the cheating spouse has kept all his income during the life of a 20 year marriage.

And he's always going to be the ultimate pig for abandoning his 3 kids without a backwards glance.

You realize she kept all her income, right?

You don't seem to have read her book, if you don't realize she basically had no income for 20 years because she stayed home raising their 3 kids (despite having equally strong academic credentials as her spouse.) Do you not realize that this was unrenumerated labor she provided to their children?

DP. I read the book which is why I know she quit her job as soon as she got married - well before kids. She even commented on it in the book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obvious the New Yorker article was planted by her ex husband and his PR team. Masterful rebuttal of her smear campaign against him.

It’s not gaining much traction though.

Because even if you try to unfairly take half of your spouse's family money, and she remains rich, it's still a scummy thing to do when the cheating spouse has kept all his income during the life of a 20 year marriage.

And he's always going to be the ultimate pig for abandoning his 3 kids without a backwards glance.

You realize she kept all her income, right?

You don't seem to have read her book, if you don't realize she basically had no income for 20 years because she stayed home raising their 3 kids (despite having equally strong academic credentials as her spouse.) Do you not realize that this was unrenumerated labor she provided to their children?

Her money makes money and she has income from that. Close to $1 mil in 2019, according to the New Yorker article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like her used her family connections to become successful and then decamped once he made it.

I know another guy like this. As soon as his wife's family money started to run out, he went on to the next woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obvious the New Yorker article was planted by her ex husband and his PR team. Masterful rebuttal of her smear campaign against him.

It’s not gaining much traction though.

Because even if you try to unfairly take half of your spouse's family money, and she remains rich, it's still a scummy thing to do when the cheating spouse has kept all his income during the life of a 20 year marriage.

And he's always going to be the ultimate pig for abandoning his 3 kids without a backwards glance.

You realize she kept all her income, right?

You don't seem to have read her book, if you don't realize she basically had no income for 20 years because she stayed home raising their 3 kids (despite having equally strong academic credentials as her spouse.) Do you not realize that this was unrenumerated labor she provided to their children?

Her money makes money and she has income from that. Close to $1 mil in 2019, according to the New Yorker article.

I don't think you read the book. She put her income and assets into marital assets. He did not, except for a month by month transfer of cash to cover some of their expenses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obvious the New Yorker article was planted by her ex husband and his PR team. Masterful rebuttal of her smear campaign against him.

It’s not gaining much traction though.

Because even if you try to unfairly take half of your spouse's family money, and she remains rich, it's still a scummy thing to do when the cheating spouse has kept all his income during the life of a 20 year marriage.

And he's always going to be the ultimate pig for abandoning his 3 kids without a backwards glance.

You realize she kept all her income, right?

You don't seem to have read her book, if you don't realize she basically had no income for 20 years because she stayed home raising their 3 kids (despite having equally strong academic credentials as her spouse.) Do you not realize that this was unrenumerated labor she provided to their children?

Her money makes money and she has income from that. Close to $1 mil in 2019, according to the New Yorker article.

I don't think you read the book. She put her income and assets into marital assets. He did not, except for a month by month transfer of cash to cover some of their expenses.

Besides her investments in the two properties, she did not do this. Her family money remained separate and protected.

Read the New Yorker article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obvious the New Yorker article was planted by her ex husband and his PR team. Masterful rebuttal of her smear campaign against him.

It’s not gaining much traction though.

Because even if you try to unfairly take half of your spouse's family money, and she remains rich, it's still a scummy thing to do when the cheating spouse has kept all his income during the life of a 20 year marriage.

And he's always going to be the ultimate pig for abandoning his 3 kids without a backwards glance.

You realize she kept all her income, right?

You don't seem to have read her book, if you don't realize she basically had no income for 20 years because she stayed home raising their 3 kids (despite having equally strong academic credentials as her spouse.) Do you not realize that this was unrenumerated labor she provided to their children?

IT’s not just unrenumerated labor she provided to her children, it’s unrenumerated labor she provided to him which he was then able to monetize for his career success - keeping all the money he earned (part of which was due to her unrenumerated labor) for himself.

[Anonymous]

Looks like Henry finally got his PR team together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obvious the New Yorker article was planted by her ex husband and his PR team. Masterful rebuttal of her smear campaign against him.

It’s not gaining much traction though.

Because even if you try to unfairly take half of your spouse's family money, and she remains rich, it's still a scummy thing to do when the cheating spouse has kept all his income during the life of a 20 year marriage.

And he's always going to be the ultimate pig for abandoning his 3 kids without a backwards glance.

You realize she kept all her income, right?

You don't seem to have read her book, if you don't realize she basically had no income for 20 years because she stayed home raising their 3 kids (despite having equally strong academic credentials as her spouse.) Do you not realize that this was unrenumerated labor she provided to their children?

IT’s not just unrenumerated labor she provided to her children, it’s unrenumerated labor she provided to him which he was then able to monetize for his career success - keeping all the money he earned (part of which was due to her unrenumerated labor) for himself.

She kept all her money to herself! Per the prenup.

[Anonymous]

Except for the properties she paid for that were also in his name, school for the kids, etc etc

[Anonymous]

She couldn’t wait to quit her job and get out of the workforce when she married her DH.