Yeah, you can tell by his MS13 tattoos…LMAO |
If he is here illegally, then why has the government conceded that there is no removal order? |
He chose for the Trump regime to break the law over and over again? |
We’ll just have to keep trying until we find a legal way to throw this piece of S out of the country. |
So telling that you don’t care one bit about the regime’s law breaking |
I love rhat this is the pathetic mountain that MAGA losers choose to die on. Does he have a go fund me? I’m going to get his family something nice for Christmas since he’s being persecuted by angry pedos. |
Because there's no removal order. They don't just spring up out of the ground. Damn, do you people ever read? The link to the explanation is linked here. Read the decision. It's not that hard. |
+1 So sad that these MAGA losers think this is Christian. I hope he gets to spend time with his family during Christmas. I wish there was a go fund me. |
Here's just a snapshot of the utter incompetence of this current administration from the decision: Since that time, Respondents have never produced an order of removal despite Abrego Garcia hinging much of his jurisdictional and legal arguments on its non-existence. ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 68–69; ECF No. 32 at 10, 15–17, 27; ECF No. 87 at 11–12. Indeed, Respondents twice sponsored the testimony of ICE officials whose job it is to effectuate removal orders, and who candidly admitted to having never seen one for Abrego Garcia. See ECF No. 107 at 30:16–22 (testimony of Cantú) (“Q: Based upon your many years of experience you described to us, you know what a final order of removal looks like, right, sir? Cantú: I do. Q: And have you seen a final order of removal in regard to Mr. Abrego Garcia? Cantú: I have not.”). See also Abrego I, ECF No. 234 at 46:6–12 (testimony of interim Assistant Director for ICE Removal Operations, Thomas Giles (“Giles”)) (“Q: You have not seen the final order of removal, have you, sir? Giles: What do you mean by that? Q: I mean, you have not seen a piece of paper that represents the final order of removal vis-a-vis Mr. Abrego Garcia, correct? Giles: No, I have not.”).15 Based on this, the Court concludes that no order of removal exists. So assistant director of ICE Removal Operations asked "what do you mean by that" when asked if they'd seen a removal order. The judge had to even affirm that this Cantu guy even know what they looked like. They couldn't produce the order because it doesn't exist. Hope that helps. |
Just FYI. The word "conceded" means that the givernment admits. In this context, it means that the government admits there is no removal order. |
You’re disgusting. |
Kilmar is a criminal and he'll continue to do criminal things. That's just the nature of the beast. This year or next year he'll be caught doing something and deported. I guarantee it. |
Yes. I know. Read my response. They conceded that there was no order because there’s no order. |
| How can he be pursued again for the same alleged violation? Wouldn't that be double jeopardy? |
This isn’t criminal court. |