Source? Or are you just going by twitter posts? Not including reinstated probation employees, not more than 10,000 involuntary terminations. And 95 pct if those were from 3 agencies. |
Even accepting your revised numbers, which I don’t think are accurate still, that’s quite a goalpost shift. Up from 6,000 to 10,000 and ignoring probationary employees who are temporarily reinstated (many are on admin leave and not working) changes it quite a bit. When assessing how scathed the employees at the SEC are, you don’t think it would be relevant to consider employees who were fired and (for the moment) reinstated? That’s a pretty traumatic experience that may or may not result in permanent job losses. It’s of course not as traumatic as having to send five bullet points about what you did last week, but it still seems worth including in the calculus of how the agency has fared compared to others. |
So how many agencies out of 450 have experienced involuntary terminations? |
DP. I can't believe you're both too lazy to look this up. https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/02/rif-watch-see-which-agencies-are-laying-federal-workers/403342/?oref=ge-related-article The article is current to 3/28, so some of the layoffs it says "will" happen have now happened. HHS laid off 10,000 people on 4/1. |