Looking at the Planning site it looks like they took their direction by splitting the difference between the Jawando and Riemer ZTAs. Mind you neither actually passed so to take un passed law as direction for policy is not the way it’s supposed to work. |
Page 50-51 of the report indicates that Planning is still "investigating" the potential effect. From that law, though, it looks like a nonprofit (e.g., church) along one of the corridors (e.g., Georgia Ave) could break up their parcel, take the 19-unit, 4-story apartment county provision and increase that to something like 24 units, possibly with mixed use and with none of the community-compatible requirements for setback, etc , on each sub-parcel, given that a percentage of the new units were affordable. That's just one of the possible stacked effects. |
Is Hans Riemer in the room with you right now? |
All of the houses have the wrong number of fingers. Also, whoever used AI to make that image missed an opportunity to blame bike lanes. I hope they do better next time. |
And yet shockingly realistic compared to the YIMBY fanfic presented to the council. They mostly just need to photoshop in a bunch of empty buses and cars sitting in traffic. |
Nah, he got sent packing. Hopefully he’s getting the place ready for a few current members of the council. |
If that's what you think, no wonder you are not effective at persuading elected officials to your point of view. |
In combination with the state level zoning changes. It’s definitely possible to that there will be incompatible development like this. |
My neighbors (some blindly liberal) won't care about any of this. What they will care about is changes to storm drainage, water runoff rules, lot coverage, height restrictions, historic preservation, and tree preservation. Are these all planned to be overridden by this policy, or do we not know? |
Rezoning to allow duplexes/triplexes/fourplexes will not change the regulations about stormwater runoff, historic preservation, or trees, because these things cannot be changed through changes to the zoning code. In addition, rezoning to allow duplexes/triplexes/fourplexes by itself will not change the regulations about height, setbacks, or lot coverage, although these things can be changed through changes to the zoning code. |
"incompatible" meaning what? |
That's incorrect, though. At most, the proposed zoning changes would eliminate exclusively single-family zoning in many parts of Montgomery County. Don't you think the flyer should provide information that is correct? You wouldn't want to purvey misinformation. |
That is factually accurate. Eliminating single family zoning effectively eliminates single family neighborhoods. The only neighborhood that will be spared are covered by HOAS or covenants. |
The county literally said they are waving setback and lot coverage requirements. They also mentioned during the meeting yesterday, that zoning codes are currently silent on triplex and quadplex units. This means that they will have to write new codes for it and there is no reason to believe that MOCO can be trusted to enforce the same standards on the plex units. Also the recent state changes in law create a loophole for by-right waivers of development standards. Once single family zoning is eliminated the state laws that override local zoning authority will apply to the entire county!! |
This state law specifically exempts areas zoned single family before a cutoff date, but the protections will no longer apply if single family zoning is eliminated. The county is trying to push this significant overhaul of zoning laws through, without conducting a thorough evaluation of the impacts. Some of these state level zoning reform law were literally passed this year. The planning office has barely scratched the surface of potential impacts through mandatory density bonuses and development standard waivers in combination eliminating single family zoning. |