Stefanik Ivy Presidentd

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Magill should have answered with a very overwrought hypothetical or example of someone clearly, threateningly and menacingly calling for genocide and then said if that were to happen, it would absolutely be against our code of conduct, we would take the matter very seriously and deal with it swiftly and then end with a long, filibustering peroration passionately and unequivocally condemning such acts of antisemitism (which conveniently are not what is happening on her campus).

Yes she should have taken a page from Stefanik’s playbook. Acting all passionate and furious for the cable news. Stefanik is such a con artist and hypocrite. She couldn’t care less about the Jews and went to Harvard herself now she’s trying to align herself with the ultra conservative. Stop falling for her antics.

Her questions were absurd. Why keep asking about genocide when there was no mention of it in the rallies??! Maybe the university presidents thought she was an idiot and refused to answer her. These presidents can also read and are very well aware of what’s happening around the world and it’s laughable that Stefanik was suggesting calls for genocide were made when it’s actually the other side carrying out acts that very closely resemble a genocide.

Because they hint at genocide with *wink wink
Their goal is to intimidate Jews, and spoil them in the mind of others, while claiming what they say is innocent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Magill should have answered with a very overwrought hypothetical or example of someone clearly, threateningly and menacingly calling for genocide and then said if that were to happen, it would absolutely be against our code of conduct, we would take the matter very seriously and deal with it swiftly and then end with a long, filibustering peroration passionately and unequivocally condemning such acts of antisemitism (which conveniently are not what is happening on her campus).

Yes she should have taken a page from Stefanik’s playbook. Acting all passionate and furious for the cable news. Stefanik is such a con artist and hypocrite. She couldn’t care less about the Jews and went to Harvard herself now she’s trying to align herself with the ultra conservative. Stop falling for her antics.

Her questions were absurd. Why keep asking about genocide when there was no mention of it in the rallies??! Maybe the university presidents thought she was an idiot and refused to answer her. These presidents can also read and are very well aware of what’s happening around the world and it’s laughable that Stefanik was suggesting calls for genocide were made when it’s actually the other side carrying out acts that very closely resemble a genocide.

You’re gonna hurt yourself with all that twisting

Don’t worry about me. I just speak the facts. You might burst from all the lies you spew every single day supporting the terrorist Zionist regime and then crying foul when people speak up against it.

DP.

I’m very worried about you. You seem angry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Magill should have answered with a very overwrought hypothetical or example of someone clearly, threateningly and menacingly calling for genocide and then said if that were to happen, it would absolutely be against our code of conduct, we would take the matter very seriously and deal with it swiftly and then end with a long, filibustering peroration passionately and unequivocally condemning such acts of antisemitism (which conveniently are not what is happening on her campus).

Yes she should have taken a page from Stefanik’s playbook. Acting all passionate and furious for the cable news. Stefanik is such a con artist and hypocrite. She couldn’t care less about the Jews and went to Harvard herself now she’s trying to align herself with the ultra conservative. Stop falling for her antics.

Her questions were absurd. Why keep asking about genocide when there was no mention of it in the rallies??! Maybe the university presidents thought she was an idiot and refused to answer her. These presidents can also read and are very well aware of what’s happening around the world and it’s laughable that Stefanik was suggesting calls for genocide were made when it’s actually the other side carrying out acts that very closely resemble a genocide.

You’re gonna hurt yourself with all that twisting

Don’t worry about me. I just speak the facts. You might burst from all the lies you spew every single day supporting the terrorist Zionist regime and then crying foul when people speak up against it.

Now that you double down I’m even more worried. This isn’t healthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Magill should have answered with a very overwrought hypothetical or example of someone clearly, threateningly and menacingly calling for genocide and then said if that were to happen, it would absolutely be against our code of conduct, we would take the matter very seriously and deal with it swiftly and then end with a long, filibustering peroration passionately and unequivocally condemning such acts of antisemitism (which conveniently are not what is happening on her campus).

Yes she should have taken a page from Stefanik’s playbook. Acting all passionate and furious for the cable news. Stefanik is such a con artist and hypocrite. She couldn’t care less about the Jews and went to Harvard herself now she’s trying to align herself with the ultra conservative. Stop falling for her antics.

Her questions were absurd. Why keep asking about genocide when there was no mention of it in the rallies??! Maybe the university presidents thought she was an idiot and refused to answer her. These presidents can also read and are very well aware of what’s happening around the world and it’s laughable that Stefanik was suggesting calls for genocide were made when it’s actually the other side carrying out acts that very closely resemble a genocide.

Because they hint at genocide with *wink wink
Their goal is to intimidate Jews, and spoil them in the mind of others, while claiming what they say is innocent

Yes it’s all a conspiracy to bring down the Jews. They are all after the Jews. Make sure your tin foil hat doesn’t poke you in the eye LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Magill should have answered with a very overwrought hypothetical or example of someone clearly, threateningly and menacingly calling for genocide and then said if that were to happen, it would absolutely be against our code of conduct, we would take the matter very seriously and deal with it swiftly and then end with a long, filibustering peroration passionately and unequivocally condemning such acts of antisemitism (which conveniently are not what is happening on her campus).

Yes she should have taken a page from Stefanik’s playbook. Acting all passionate and furious for the cable news. Stefanik is such a con artist and hypocrite. She couldn’t care less about the Jews and went to Harvard herself now she’s trying to align herself with the ultra conservative. Stop falling for her antics.

Her questions were absurd. Why keep asking about genocide when there was no mention of it in the rallies??! Maybe the university presidents thought she was an idiot and refused to answer her. These presidents can also read and are very well aware of what’s happening around the world and it’s laughable that Stefanik was suggesting calls for genocide were made when it’s actually the other side carrying out acts that very closely resemble a genocide.

You’re gonna hurt yourself with all that twisting

Don’t worry about me. I just speak the facts. You might burst from all the lies you spew every single day supporting the terrorist Zionist regime and then crying foul when people speak up against it.

DP.

I’m very worried about you. You seem angry.

And you’re not angry? Are you taking pleasure in seeing dead bodies of children and reading about it in the news? You must be heartless and devoid of humanity to not be angry after thousands of innocent civilians have been killed. Please seek therapy to develop some empathy or maybe you’re even past that point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Magill should have answered with a very overwrought hypothetical or example of someone clearly, threateningly and menacingly calling for genocide and then said if that were to happen, it would absolutely be against our code of conduct, we would take the matter very seriously and deal with it swiftly and then end with a long, filibustering peroration passionately and unequivocally condemning such acts of antisemitism (which conveniently are not what is happening on her campus).

Yes she should have taken a page from Stefanik’s playbook. Acting all passionate and furious for the cable news. Stefanik is such a con artist and hypocrite. She couldn’t care less about the Jews and went to Harvard herself now she’s trying to align herself with the ultra conservative. Stop falling for her antics.

Her questions were absurd. Why keep asking about genocide when there was no mention of it in the rallies??! Maybe the university presidents thought she was an idiot and refused to answer her. These presidents can also read and are very well aware of what’s happening around the world and it’s laughable that Stefanik was suggesting calls for genocide were made when it’s actually the other side carrying out acts that very closely resemble a genocide.

You’re gonna hurt yourself with all that twisting

Don’t worry about me. I just speak the facts. You might burst from all the lies you spew every single day supporting the terrorist Zionist regime and then crying foul when people speak up against it.

DP.

I’m very worried about you. You seem angry.

And you’re not angry? Are you taking pleasure in seeing dead bodies of children and reading about it in the news? You must be heartless and devoid of humanity to not be angry after thousands of innocent civilians have been killed. Please seek therapy to develop some empathy or maybe you’re even past that point.

Like I said...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Magill should have answered with a very overwrought hypothetical or example of someone clearly, threateningly and menacingly calling for genocide and then said if that were to happen, it would absolutely be against our code of conduct, we would take the matter very seriously and deal with it swiftly and then end with a long, filibustering peroration passionately and unequivocally condemning such acts of antisemitism (which conveniently are not what is happening on her campus).

Yes she should have taken a page from Stefanik’s playbook. Acting all passionate and furious for the cable news. Stefanik is such a con artist and hypocrite. She couldn’t care less about the Jews and went to Harvard herself now she’s trying to align herself with the ultra conservative. Stop falling for her antics.

Her questions were absurd. Why keep asking about genocide when there was no mention of it in the rallies??! Maybe the university presidents thought she was an idiot and refused to answer her. These presidents can also read and are very well aware of what’s happening around the world and it’s laughable that Stefanik was suggesting calls for genocide were made when it’s actually the other side carrying out acts that very closely resemble a genocide.

You’re gonna hurt yourself with all that twisting

Don’t worry about me. I just speak the facts. You might burst from all the lies you spew every single day supporting the terrorist Zionist regime and then crying foul when people speak up against it.

DP.

I’m very worried about you. You seem angry.

And you’re not angry? Are you taking pleasure in seeing dead bodies of children and reading about it in the news? You must be heartless and devoid of humanity to not be angry after thousands of innocent civilians have been killed. Please seek therapy to develop some empathy or maybe you’re even past that point.

We’re talking about the utter hypocrisy in the Ivy League. Try to stay on topic.

[Anonymous]

What will happen to the students who do not care about Israel? We know the Palestinian and anyone criticizing Israel will be gone from Ivies.

How are they going to enforce this?

[Anonymous]

Regardless of what initial intentions student protesters may have for chants such as “globalize the intifada,” or any of the other slogans associated with eliminating Jewish people from Israel’s land, they can no longer pretend not to know that their use causes many people a reasonably felt sense of intimidation. On this matter, the Age of Innocence is behind us. If college campuses regularly had groups of kids chanting “White power,” I would not be comfortable sending my children there, even if those chanters never took a “targeted” action against a specific person.

Excellent Op-Ed by Danielle Allen in the Post: https://wapo.st/4aq36pA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What will happen to the students who do not care about Israel? We know the Palestinian and anyone criticizing Israel will be gone from Ivies.

How are they going to enforce this?

They won't be gone. But their political activities will impact employment prospects.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Magill should have answered with a very overwrought hypothetical or example of someone clearly, threateningly and menacingly calling for genocide and then said if that were to happen, it would absolutely be against our code of conduct, we would take the matter very seriously and deal with it swiftly and then end with a long, filibustering peroration passionately and unequivocally condemning such acts of antisemitism (which conveniently are not what is happening on her campus).

Yes she should have taken a page from Stefanik’s playbook. Acting all passionate and furious for the cable news. Stefanik is such a con artist and hypocrite. She couldn’t care less about the Jews and went to Harvard herself now she’s trying to align herself with the ultra conservative. Stop falling for her antics.

Her questions were absurd. Why keep asking about genocide when there was no mention of it in the rallies??! Maybe the university presidents thought she was an idiot and refused to answer her. These presidents can also read and are very well aware of what’s happening around the world and it’s laughable that Stefanik was suggesting calls for genocide were made when it’s actually the other side carrying out acts that very closely resemble a genocide.

Because they hint at genocide with *wink wink
Their goal is to intimidate Jews, and spoil them in the mind of others, while claiming what they say is innocent

Yes it’s all a conspiracy to bring down the Jews. They are all after the Jews. Make sure your tin foil hat doesn’t poke you in the eye LOL.

It is true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Magill should have answered with a very overwrought hypothetical or example of someone clearly, threateningly and menacingly calling for genocide and then said if that were to happen, it would absolutely be against our code of conduct, we would take the matter very seriously and deal with it swiftly and then end with a long, filibustering peroration passionately and unequivocally condemning such acts of antisemitism (which conveniently are not what is happening on her campus).

Yes she should have taken a page from Stefanik’s playbook. Acting all passionate and furious for the cable news. Stefanik is such a con artist and hypocrite. She couldn’t care less about the Jews and went to Harvard herself now she’s trying to align herself with the ultra conservative. Stop falling for her antics.

Her questions were absurd. Why keep asking about genocide when there was no mention of it in the rallies??! Maybe the university presidents thought she was an idiot and refused to answer her. These presidents can also read and are very well aware of what’s happening around the world and it’s laughable that Stefanik was suggesting calls for genocide were made when it’s actually the other side carrying out acts that very closely resemble a genocide.

Because they hint at genocide with *wink wink
Their goal is to intimidate Jews, and spoil them in the mind of others, while claiming what they say is innocent

Yes it’s all a conspiracy to bring down the Jews. They are all after the Jews. Make sure your tin foil hat doesn’t poke you in the eye LOL.

Not a conspiracy, a plan, to spoil Jews in the minds of Americans, so Americans will join in dismantling the nation of Israel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Magill should have answered with a very overwrought hypothetical or example of someone clearly, threateningly and menacingly calling for genocide and then said if that were to happen, it would absolutely be against our code of conduct, we would take the matter very seriously and deal with it swiftly and then end with a long, filibustering peroration passionately and unequivocally condemning such acts of antisemitism (which conveniently are not what is happening on her campus).

Yes she should have taken a page from Stefanik’s playbook. Acting all passionate and furious for the cable news. Stefanik is such a con artist and hypocrite. She couldn’t care less about the Jews and went to Harvard herself now she’s trying to align herself with the ultra conservative. Stop falling for her antics.

Her questions were absurd. Why keep asking about genocide when there was no mention of it in the rallies??! Maybe the university presidents thought she was an idiot and refused to answer her. These presidents can also read and are very well aware of what’s happening around the world and it’s laughable that Stefanik was suggesting calls for genocide were made when it’s actually the other side carrying out acts that very closely resemble a genocide.

Because they hint at genocide with *wink wink
Their goal is to intimidate Jews, and spoil them in the mind of others, while claiming what they say is innocent

Yes it’s all a conspiracy to bring down the Jews. They are all after the Jews. Make sure your tin foil hat doesn’t poke you in the eye LOL.

Not a conspiracy, a plan, to spoil Jews in the minds of Americans, so Americans will join in dismantling the nation of Israel.

This exactly. Demonize the Jews to erode political support for Israel.

It's a toxic political game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Regardless of what initial intentions student protesters may have for chants such as “globalize the intifada,” or any of the other slogans associated with eliminating Jewish people from Israel’s land, they can no longer pretend not to know that their use causes many people a reasonably felt sense of intimidation. On this matter, the Age of Innocence is behind us. If college campuses regularly had groups of kids chanting “White power,” I would not be comfortable sending my children there, even if those chanters never took a “targeted” action against a specific person.

Excellent Op-Ed by Danielle Allen in the Post: https://wapo.st/4aq36pA

What is a "reasonably felt sense of intimidation"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regardless of what initial intentions student protesters may have for chants such as “globalize the intifada,” or any of the other slogans associated with eliminating Jewish people from Israel’s land, they can no longer pretend not to know that their use causes many people a reasonably felt sense of intimidation. On this matter, the Age of Innocence is behind us. If college campuses regularly had groups of kids chanting “White power,” I would not be comfortable sending my children there, even if those chanters never took a “targeted” action against a specific person.

Excellent Op-Ed by Danielle Allen in the Post: https://wapo.st/4aq36pA

What is a "reasonably felt sense of intimidation"?

Read the article. It's well worth it.