Capitol Hill families - If you moved to NW or burbs for school, do you have any regrets?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most people on CH can’t afford to move or go private, so they are really stuck. However there are more charter high schools than the ones DCUM finds acceptable and many families I know send their kids to these high schools.


Total BS. Whether a family rents or buys on CH, the same money spent on rent and equity/mortgage payments could be spent on housing in the DC burbs. No middle-class family is stuck with mediocre or bad schooling options in Ward 6.


No, housing is relatively cheaper on the Hill. Many of us can’t trade up that easily.


Cheaper as compared to where? North and Central Arlington 3-bedroom houses and Hill houses are priced comparably (we've done lots of searching). Same with 3-bedroom rentals. Almost all of Fairfax and Falls Church and at least half of MoCo are cheaper than the Hill.



Not for schools that are clearly better.

NW DC, Arlington, Falls Church and MoCo zoned for the “good” schools have almosr nothing under $1m. 20002/20003 currently have 150+ 2br+ properties for under $1 mil. Fairfax is better but you start getting really deep into the burbs and trading off time for money.

This leaves families contemplating a move to the DCC or Richard Montgomery HS. At that point many Hill families will stick it out a bit longer to hope that Walls or McKinley or a cheaper Catholic HS will work out.

You keep saying this. But you've been told over and over again that things sell quickly in these areas so you just won't ever see lots of inventory at any price point. (At least not in the 7 years I've lived in Arlington.) There are never ever 150+ properties on the market in a single price range. You have to watch when things come up and pounce. It doesn't mean that there aren't options. It just means that they don't sit around.


This is not even remotely limited to Arlington. Houses in the Dc area sell fast. And i don’t know where you’re finding homes under 1 million on Capitol Hill. They don’t really exist.

As a final note- Arlington middle schools are not good.


What is your basis for arguing this? I live on the Hill while my ex lives in Arlington. We split custody. I like the neighborhood MS my boys attend in Arlington, although it's not one of the several with the "most favorable demographics." My rising 8th grader has earned the grades to enroll in "intensified" (honors) classes across the board for his last year in MS, in science, math (geometry and algebra II), social studies (geography for HS credit), English and band. He's also going into his 3rd year of Chinese at the school. He's taken band as a daily class since 6th grade, learned to play a brass instrument well for free. For the most part, his teachers are strong, experienced, older, been at the school for many years. Admins tell me that intensified classes outside math will be available to younger son starting in 7th grade, a new county initiative.

At the several DCPS middle schools in Ward 6, which my ex and I considered, the only definite honors classes I heard about are for math, and maybe grade-level English at Stuart Hobson. If Arlington middle schools aren't good, where are they good in this area, other than the super duper GT test-in programs in Fairfax and MoCo serving less than 10% of students? Arlington doesn't have test-in GT, DCPS either of course.


A lot of UMC in Ward 6 have kids at BASIS, which starts in 5th. True, you have to get accepted in 5th grade and it gets harder each year (easier with sibling preference).

There are other options in DC as well:

https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/middle-schools/district-of-columbia

Other than maybe Williamsburg or Swanson, it doesn't seem like Arlington has very good options.


This CH mom with kids in a public MS in Arlington, where my ex lives, doesn't agree. My boys aren't at Williamsburg, Swanson or Dorothy Hamm. Every Arlington MS teaches MS math on a par with that at BASIS, offers robust foreign language options (from 6th grade, and not just at the beginning level), serious electives and a full menu of core honors classes in 8th grade (and 7th grade from SY 2024-25). My kids' biggest classes have two dozen kids. Their writing classes (separate from reading classes) have no more than 15 students. They can take like ASL, orchestra, chorus, band, cooking, forensics or science competition prep as electives daily. Their school has giant playing fields/courts, a greenhouse and a large vegetable garden, an indoor track, a student run TV station, a modern theater/stage, and giant gym and library. I've worked as a consultant in the miserable BASIS building and know it well.


That sounds like a lot of unsupported rhetoric. What school and what is the data supporting your claims?


Unsupported rhetoric is silly. Thomas Jefferson, the smallest of the six with around 800 students. The auditorium and indoor track are shared with the county. Jefferson is the only Arlington MS offering the IB Middle Years Curriculum, feeding into the Washington-Liberty IBD program. The school requires languages from 6th grade and teaches more languages than the other schools. All Arlington middle schools permit students to take math up to two years ahead of the curriculum. I get emails from the county announcing the roll-out of 8th grade intensified classes, followed by the roll out of 7th grade intensified classes the following school year. We've signed up for 8th grade intensified classes for sci, math, social studies and English.


Only about 15% of Arlington middle school students currently take Algebra I in 7th grade. We'll see how that changes.

BASIS DC requires that 100% of students take at least Algebra and Geometry I in 7th grade. In fact, some 7th grade students take Algebra and Geometry II, Precalc B, or Precalc AB.


The arrangement isn't nearly as rosy as you make it sound, doesn't give a true picture. My BASIS middle school grad was forced to repeat a lot of algebra and geometry in 9th grade at a top private, although he'd always earned good math grades at BASIS. He was pushed to accelerate in math too fast at BASIS, with no way out. I've heard the same story from many other BASIS parents, particularly those who moved onto Walls or suburban high schools. I know that the percentage of MoCo, Arlington and Fairfax MS students taking Algebra in 7th grade is way down from 10 years ago, for good reason. Those counties took a hard look at what aggressive middle school math acceleration for most had wrought in high school and ratcheted it back. Based on our experience, it would behoove BASIS to follow suit, unless DC were to set up elementary school math GT programs that fed into BASIS!


Or at least BASIS should offer slower tracks. There is some advantages to having accelerated math, but only for the kids that can actually handle that.


The good thing is that BASIS is a DC-wide charter and parents can self-select if their kids will go. If you don't want an accelerated curriculum for your child, choose another school.


I used to work at BASIS so I know how unreasonable the above statement is. What BASIS does is dole out the Kool-Aid on math acceleration. They convince parents that all that's required of their children is hard work, claiming that most 12–13-year-olds can ace 7th grade algebra if they simply put nose to the grindstone. Parents fall for it, the kids diligently log their math homework time, and, for the most part, earn the requisite grades to progress in the BASIS curriculum. Problem is, the required math is a reach for most of these students, cutting into their time for subjects and activities they like more and are better at, chipping away at their self-esteem and, frankly, setting them up for greater math struggles up the chain. Because there is no acceptable alternative DC public middle school for most of these families to choose, parents and kids play along, scraping by with the math without necessarily building a solid foundation to handle more advanced math. Hanging in there on BASIS math is, after all, better than cutting and running to the burbs or stretching the family budget to the breaking point to pay for private school. Fundamentally, it's a poorly thought through arrangement that does a disservice to all involved. I blame DCPS more than BASIS, for continuing to pour crazy resources into snazzy middle and high school buildings that remain undersubscribed for lack of demand.


Here's the problem. The highest-performing public middle schools in this area feature widespread academic tracking. Students have access to a finely tuned "accelerated curriculum." A strong student in MoCo, Fairfax or Arlington can do highly accelerated work in certain subjects, moderately accelerated work in others, and at-grade level work in their weakest subjects, at least by 8th grade. What happens in DC is that MS students are lumped together in the same classes through 8th grade, other than for math, and for languages at DCI. So kids who don't belong in 7th grade algebra at BASIS (around half the students) must take it, while kids who are ready for advanced work in other subjects can't pursue it at school.

In a nutshell, lack of appropriate academic tracking is the main reason Hill families leave for suburban schools and private schools. The parents who stay often pay for tutors, academic enrichment programs or coach their kids to fill in gaps. We know BASIS families who pay for English and language tutors and camps because their kids aren't challenged in these subjects at school. Contrary to popular belief, the BASIS and Latin curricula aren't accelerated across the board.

I teach at a suburban MS offering four levels of English and math by 8th grade and several levels of social studies, language and science. In a nutshell, the double whammy of lack of appropriate academic tracking and very limited school choice (but an abundance of "school chance") drives DC families out, including many in the J-R pyramid.

You can bicker all you want about where Capitol Hill's boundaries fall without changing the fact that all of us EotP are impacted.
Anonymous
Do Deal and Hardy track or are things better because they have more students at grade level?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most people on CH can’t afford to move or go private, so they are really stuck. However there are more charter high schools than the ones DCUM finds acceptable and many families I know send their kids to these high schools.


Total BS. Whether a family rents or buys on CH, the same money spent on rent and equity/mortgage payments could be spent on housing in the DC burbs. No middle-class family is stuck with mediocre or bad schooling options in Ward 6.


No, housing is relatively cheaper on the Hill. Many of us can’t trade up that easily.


Cheaper as compared to where? North and Central Arlington 3-bedroom houses and Hill houses are priced comparably (we've done lots of searching). Same with 3-bedroom rentals. Almost all of Fairfax and Falls Church and at least half of MoCo are cheaper than the Hill.



Not for schools that are clearly better.

NW DC, Arlington, Falls Church and MoCo zoned for the “good” schools have almosr nothing under $1m. 20002/20003 currently have 150+ 2br+ properties for under $1 mil. Fairfax is better but you start getting really deep into the burbs and trading off time for money.

This leaves families contemplating a move to the DCC or Richard Montgomery HS. At that point many Hill families will stick it out a bit longer to hope that Walls or McKinley or a cheaper Catholic HS will work out.

You keep saying this. But you've been told over and over again that things sell quickly in these areas so you just won't ever see lots of inventory at any price point. (At least not in the 7 years I've lived in Arlington.) There are never ever 150+ properties on the market in a single price range. You have to watch when things come up and pounce. It doesn't mean that there aren't options. It just means that they don't sit around.


This is not even remotely limited to Arlington. Houses in the Dc area sell fast. And i don’t know where you’re finding homes under 1 million on Capitol Hill. They don’t really exist.

As a final note- Arlington middle schools are not good.
There's some poster who is convinced there are >150 properties on the Hill for sale for less than $1m. That doesn't seem right to me, but I'm not going to waste my time checking. She has some crazy notion that there are endless cheap options on the Hill, but nothing at all is affordable in Arlington. (Of course her reference for Arlington is that nothing is listed the last week of July--literally the worst time to look for real estate in the DMV.).


“I don’t believe you and I’m not going to check but you’re wrong for sure.”

truly amazing


I checked. There is exactly 1 (one) 3 bedroom home on Capitol Hill under a million dollars. One. And the reason for the low price has mostly to do with the condition of the home. If you remove the filter for 3 bedrooms and choose 2 bedrooms and up, there are 5 homes for sale, and 4 of them are condos.

So whoever you are, stop being crazy and pretending there are tons of homes on the hill for sale for under a million. I wish there were- I would happily buy one!


Huh? You’re not using Redfin correctly or you have a very restricted definition of Capitol Hill. Try again because you’re wrong.

Signed, someone who will be selling a Maury-zoned house soon for around 900k.


NP. Out of morbid curiosity, I just looked on Redfin for 3 beds 2 bath on the Hill sold for under $1 million in the last 6 months. I came up with 7 properties, four of which sold for over $950k.


Who said we all live in 3br/2ba homes? And you’re probably not searching the entire SH/EH cachement (an extended definition of the Hill).

The reason this line of discussion came up here is to point out that “move to N Arlington where the schools are better” is not financially feasible for many Hill families facing down MS/HS (or upper elementary in the case of some schools). Many of us do not live in $1mil houses. Cashing out our home equity means either a) moving way out to Fairfax to get “good” schools or b) making a trade up to MoCo where it’s arguable whether the DCC HS are that much of an upgrade over waiting to see if something works out in DC.


Uhm, the EH boundary includes the entire Maury, Miner & Payne boundaries… That is way beyond even an extended definition of Capitol Hill. All the way out at like 24th & Benning?? No wonder people are saying CH real estate is cheap. CH means the Historic district + maybe out to the Starburst in NE & Congressional Cemetery in SE if we’re going with outer boundaries of neighborhood feel. In no world is 21st & anything “Capitol Hill.”


Most Payne and Maury families and many Miner consider themselves “Capitol Hill” families. And the situation is the same because we all face the same MS/HS dilemma. But sure, if you want to define away the problem, go ahead ….



“Most” Payne and “many” Miner… Probably the ones who live on or at least near Capitol Hill, or perhaps the ones sucked by real estate agents. It’s not defining the problem (which Ward 5 has as well) away to say that almost a mile from the Capitol Hill historic district does not equal Capitol Hill. Geographically Chinatown is closer to the Hill than 24th & Benning, that doesn’t make it Capitol Hill.

Also, when there’s a big discussion on whether people on the Hill could afford to sell their houses and move to Arlington, there’s obviously a huge difference in the answer for folks with houses in the Historic District ($1 million minimum with a few exceptions) and folks living out in an area where the average house seems to be $600K way on the other side of the Starburst. Defining everyone into Capitol Hill actually masks that people have very different options.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Do Deal and Hardy track or are things better because they have more students at grade level?


Yes, much better, with far more students working at grade level in Upper NW than EotP, but not great.

The quality of teaching at Deal is said to vary even more than that at the Ward 6 middle schools. No DCPS middle school tracks formally outside math and for grade-level English at Hardy, Stuart Hobson and possibly Jefferson Academy (no clear answers on tracking from JA).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most people on CH can’t afford to move or go private, so they are really stuck. However there are more charter high schools than the ones DCUM finds acceptable and many families I know send their kids to these high schools.


Total BS. Whether a family rents or buys on CH, the same money spent on rent and equity/mortgage payments could be spent on housing in the DC burbs. No middle-class family is stuck with mediocre or bad schooling options in Ward 6.


No, housing is relatively cheaper on the Hill. Many of us can’t trade up that easily.


Cheaper as compared to where? North and Central Arlington 3-bedroom houses and Hill houses are priced comparably (we've done lots of searching). Same with 3-bedroom rentals. Almost all of Fairfax and Falls Church and at least half of MoCo are cheaper than the Hill.



Not for schools that are clearly better.

NW DC, Arlington, Falls Church and MoCo zoned for the “good” schools have almosr nothing under $1m. 20002/20003 currently have 150+ 2br+ properties for under $1 mil. Fairfax is better but you start getting really deep into the burbs and trading off time for money.

This leaves families contemplating a move to the DCC or Richard Montgomery HS. At that point many Hill families will stick it out a bit longer to hope that Walls or McKinley or a cheaper Catholic HS will work out.

You keep saying this. But you've been told over and over again that things sell quickly in these areas so you just won't ever see lots of inventory at any price point. (At least not in the 7 years I've lived in Arlington.) There are never ever 150+ properties on the market in a single price range. You have to watch when things come up and pounce. It doesn't mean that there aren't options. It just means that they don't sit around.


This is not even remotely limited to Arlington. Houses in the Dc area sell fast. And i don’t know where you’re finding homes under 1 million on Capitol Hill. They don’t really exist.

As a final note- Arlington middle schools are not good.


What is your basis for arguing this? I live on the Hill while my ex lives in Arlington. We split custody. I like the neighborhood MS my boys attend in Arlington, although it's not one of the several with the "most favorable demographics." My rising 8th grader has earned the grades to enroll in "intensified" (honors) classes across the board for his last year in MS, in science, math (geometry and algebra II), social studies (geography for HS credit), English and band. He's also going into his 3rd year of Chinese at the school. He's taken band as a daily class since 6th grade, learned to play a brass instrument well for free. For the most part, his teachers are strong, experienced, older, been at the school for many years. Admins tell me that intensified classes outside math will be available to younger son starting in 7th grade, a new county initiative.

At the several DCPS middle schools in Ward 6, which my ex and I considered, the only definite honors classes I heard about are for math, and maybe grade-level English at Stuart Hobson. If Arlington middle schools aren't good, where are they good in this area, other than the super duper GT test-in programs in Fairfax and MoCo serving less than 10% of students? Arlington doesn't have test-in GT, DCPS either of course.


A lot of UMC in Ward 6 have kids at BASIS, which starts in 5th. True, you have to get accepted in 5th grade and it gets harder each year (easier with sibling preference).

There are other options in DC as well:

https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/middle-schools/district-of-columbia

Other than maybe Williamsburg or Swanson, it doesn't seem like Arlington has very good options.


This CH mom with kids in a public MS in Arlington, where my ex lives, doesn't agree. My boys aren't at Williamsburg, Swanson or Dorothy Hamm. Every Arlington MS teaches MS math on a par with that at BASIS, offers robust foreign language options (from 6th grade, and not just at the beginning level), serious electives and a full menu of core honors classes in 8th grade (and 7th grade from SY 2024-25). My kids' biggest classes have two dozen kids. Their writing classes (separate from reading classes) have no more than 15 students. They can take like ASL, orchestra, chorus, band, cooking, forensics or science competition prep as electives daily. Their school has giant playing fields/courts, a greenhouse and a large vegetable garden, an indoor track, a student run TV station, a modern theater/stage, and giant gym and library. I've worked as a consultant in the miserable BASIS building and know it well.


That sounds like a lot of unsupported rhetoric. What school and what is the data supporting your claims?


Unsupported rhetoric is silly. Thomas Jefferson, the smallest of the six with around 800 students. The auditorium and indoor track are shared with the county. Jefferson is the only Arlington MS offering the IB Middle Years Curriculum, feeding into the Washington-Liberty IBD program. The school requires languages from 6th grade and teaches more languages than the other schools. All Arlington middle schools permit students to take math up to two years ahead of the curriculum. I get emails from the county announcing the roll-out of 8th grade intensified classes, followed by the roll out of 7th grade intensified classes the following school year. We've signed up for 8th grade intensified classes for sci, math, social studies and English.


Only about 15% of Arlington middle school students currently take Algebra I in 7th grade. We'll see how that changes.

BASIS DC requires that 100% of students take at least Algebra and Geometry I in 7th grade. In fact, some 7th grade students take Algebra and Geometry II, Precalc B, or Precalc AB.


The arrangement isn't nearly as rosy as you make it sound, doesn't give a true picture. My BASIS middle school grad was forced to repeat a lot of algebra and geometry in 9th grade at a top private, although he'd always earned good math grades at BASIS. He was pushed to accelerate in math too fast at BASIS, with no way out. I've heard the same story from many other BASIS parents, particularly those who moved onto Walls or suburban high schools. I know that the percentage of MoCo, Arlington and Fairfax MS students taking Algebra in 7th grade is way down from 10 years ago, for good reason. Those counties took a hard look at what aggressive middle school math acceleration for most had wrought in high school and ratcheted it back. Based on our experience, it would behoove BASIS to follow suit, unless DC were to set up elementary school math GT programs that fed into BASIS!


Or at least BASIS should offer slower tracks. There is some advantages to having accelerated math, but only for the kids that can actually handle that.


The good thing is that BASIS is a DC-wide charter and parents can self-select if their kids will go. If you don't want an accelerated curriculum for your child, choose another school.


I used to work at BASIS so I know how unreasonable the above statement is. What BASIS does is dole out the Kool-Aid on math acceleration. They convince parents that all that's required of their children is hard work, claiming that most 12–13-year-olds can ace 7th grade algebra if they simply put nose to the grindstone. Parents fall for it, the kids diligently log their math homework time, and, for the most part, earn the requisite grades to progress in the BASIS curriculum. Problem is, the required math is a reach for most of these students, cutting into their time for subjects and activities they like more and are better at, chipping away at their self-esteem and, frankly, setting them up for greater math struggles up the chain. Because there is no acceptable alternative DC public middle school for most of these families to choose, parents and kids play along, scraping by with the math without necessarily building a solid foundation to handle more advanced math. Hanging in there on BASIS math is, after all, better than cutting and running to the burbs or stretching the family budget to the breaking point to pay for private school. Fundamentally, it's a poorly thought through arrangement that does a disservice to all involved. I blame DCPS more than BASIS, for continuing to pour crazy resources into snazzy middle and high school buildings that remain undersubscribed for lack of demand.


Here's the problem. The highest-performing public middle schools in this area feature widespread academic tracking. Students have access to a finely tuned "accelerated curriculum." A strong student in MoCo, Fairfax or Arlington can do highly accelerated work in certain subjects, moderately accelerated work in others, and at-grade level work in their weakest subjects, at least by 8th grade. What happens in DC is that MS students are lumped together in the same classes through 8th grade, other than for math, and for languages at DCI. So kids who don't belong in 7th grade algebra at BASIS (around half the students) must take it, while kids who are ready for advanced work in other subjects can't pursue it at school.

In a nutshell, lack of appropriate academic tracking is the main reason Hill families leave for suburban schools and private schools. The parents who stay often pay for tutors, academic enrichment programs or coach their kids to fill in gaps. We know BASIS families who pay for English and language tutors and camps because their kids aren't challenged in these subjects at school. Contrary to popular belief, the BASIS and Latin curricula aren't accelerated across the board.

I teach at a suburban MS offering four levels of English and math by 8th grade and several levels of social studies, language and science. In a nutshell, the double whammy of lack of appropriate academic tracking and very limited school choice (but an abundance of "school chance") drives DC families out, including many in the J-R pyramid.

You can bicker all you want about where Capitol Hill's boundaries fall without changing the fact that all of us EotP are impacted.


Let’s see. You teach at a suburban middle school yet you are somehow an expert on Basis. In fact, your “analysis” is way off.

-The curriculum at Basis is advanced across the board, not just in math. Just take a course catalogue.

-There is plenty of flexibility in taking courses (even though Basis is a lot smaller than many suburban schools), especially starting in high school. Some students take Calc BC in 10th grade; some never take it at all. Some students take an AP class in 8th grade; some don’t. All students start taking AP classes in 9th grade; some end up taking 6 AP classes but others take 10-15. After the first few years, there is effectively tracking at Basis.

-Lots of parents at Big 3 private schools supplement with tutors and camps. Just read the posts on the private school board. That says nothing about the curriculum.

-Basis is a great option for a lot of families, including those on the Hill, who didn’t want to flee to the suburbs. If you don’t want your kid to be challenged, don’t send him or her to Basis.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most people on CH can’t afford to move or go private, so they are really stuck. However there are more charter high schools than the ones DCUM finds acceptable and many families I know send their kids to these high schools.


Total BS. Whether a family rents or buys on CH, the same money spent on rent and equity/mortgage payments could be spent on housing in the DC burbs. No middle-class family is stuck with mediocre or bad schooling options in Ward 6.


No, housing is relatively cheaper on the Hill. Many of us can’t trade up that easily.


Cheaper as compared to where? North and Central Arlington 3-bedroom houses and Hill houses are priced comparably (we've done lots of searching). Same with 3-bedroom rentals. Almost all of Fairfax and Falls Church and at least half of MoCo are cheaper than the Hill.



Not for schools that are clearly better.

NW DC, Arlington, Falls Church and MoCo zoned for the “good” schools have almosr nothing under $1m. 20002/20003 currently have 150+ 2br+ properties for under $1 mil. Fairfax is better but you start getting really deep into the burbs and trading off time for money.

This leaves families contemplating a move to the DCC or Richard Montgomery HS. At that point many Hill families will stick it out a bit longer to hope that Walls or McKinley or a cheaper Catholic HS will work out.

You keep saying this. But you've been told over and over again that things sell quickly in these areas so you just won't ever see lots of inventory at any price point. (At least not in the 7 years I've lived in Arlington.) There are never ever 150+ properties on the market in a single price range. You have to watch when things come up and pounce. It doesn't mean that there aren't options. It just means that they don't sit around.


This is not even remotely limited to Arlington. Houses in the Dc area sell fast. And i don’t know where you’re finding homes under 1 million on Capitol Hill. They don’t really exist.

As a final note- Arlington middle schools are not good.


What is your basis for arguing this? I live on the Hill while my ex lives in Arlington. We split custody. I like the neighborhood MS my boys attend in Arlington, although it's not one of the several with the "most favorable demographics." My rising 8th grader has earned the grades to enroll in "intensified" (honors) classes across the board for his last year in MS, in science, math (geometry and algebra II), social studies (geography for HS credit), English and band. He's also going into his 3rd year of Chinese at the school. He's taken band as a daily class since 6th grade, learned to play a brass instrument well for free. For the most part, his teachers are strong, experienced, older, been at the school for many years. Admins tell me that intensified classes outside math will be available to younger son starting in 7th grade, a new county initiative.

At the several DCPS middle schools in Ward 6, which my ex and I considered, the only definite honors classes I heard about are for math, and maybe grade-level English at Stuart Hobson. If Arlington middle schools aren't good, where are they good in this area, other than the super duper GT test-in programs in Fairfax and MoCo serving less than 10% of students? Arlington doesn't have test-in GT, DCPS either of course.


A lot of UMC in Ward 6 have kids at BASIS, which starts in 5th. True, you have to get accepted in 5th grade and it gets harder each year (easier with sibling preference).

There are other options in DC as well:

https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/middle-schools/district-of-columbia

Other than maybe Williamsburg or Swanson, it doesn't seem like Arlington has very good options.


This CH mom with kids in a public MS in Arlington, where my ex lives, doesn't agree. My boys aren't at Williamsburg, Swanson or Dorothy Hamm. Every Arlington MS teaches MS math on a par with that at BASIS, offers robust foreign language options (from 6th grade, and not just at the beginning level), serious electives and a full menu of core honors classes in 8th grade (and 7th grade from SY 2024-25). My kids' biggest classes have two dozen kids. Their writing classes (separate from reading classes) have no more than 15 students. They can take like ASL, orchestra, chorus, band, cooking, forensics or science competition prep as electives daily. Their school has giant playing fields/courts, a greenhouse and a large vegetable garden, an indoor track, a student run TV station, a modern theater/stage, and giant gym and library. I've worked as a consultant in the miserable BASIS building and know it well.


That sounds like a lot of unsupported rhetoric. What school and what is the data supporting your claims?


Unsupported rhetoric is silly. Thomas Jefferson, the smallest of the six with around 800 students. The auditorium and indoor track are shared with the county. Jefferson is the only Arlington MS offering the IB Middle Years Curriculum, feeding into the Washington-Liberty IBD program. The school requires languages from 6th grade and teaches more languages than the other schools. All Arlington middle schools permit students to take math up to two years ahead of the curriculum. I get emails from the county announcing the roll-out of 8th grade intensified classes, followed by the roll out of 7th grade intensified classes the following school year. We've signed up for 8th grade intensified classes for sci, math, social studies and English.


Only about 15% of Arlington middle school students currently take Algebra I in 7th grade. We'll see how that changes.

BASIS DC requires that 100% of students take at least Algebra and Geometry I in 7th grade. In fact, some 7th grade students take Algebra and Geometry II, Precalc B, or Precalc AB.


The arrangement isn't nearly as rosy as you make it sound, doesn't give a true picture. My BASIS middle school grad was forced to repeat a lot of algebra and geometry in 9th grade at a top private, although he'd always earned good math grades at BASIS. He was pushed to accelerate in math too fast at BASIS, with no way out. I've heard the same story from many other BASIS parents, particularly those who moved onto Walls or suburban high schools. I know that the percentage of MoCo, Arlington and Fairfax MS students taking Algebra in 7th grade is way down from 10 years ago, for good reason. Those counties took a hard look at what aggressive middle school math acceleration for most had wrought in high school and ratcheted it back. Based on our experience, it would behoove BASIS to follow suit, unless DC were to set up elementary school math GT programs that fed into BASIS!


Or at least BASIS should offer slower tracks. There is some advantages to having accelerated math, but only for the kids that can actually handle that.


The good thing is that BASIS is a DC-wide charter and parents can self-select if their kids will go. If you don't want an accelerated curriculum for your child, choose another school.


I used to work at BASIS so I know how unreasonable the above statement is. What BASIS does is dole out the Kool-Aid on math acceleration. They convince parents that all that's required of their children is hard work, claiming that most 12–13-year-olds can ace 7th grade algebra if they simply put nose to the grindstone. Parents fall for it, the kids diligently log their math homework time, and, for the most part, earn the requisite grades to progress in the BASIS curriculum. Problem is, the required math is a reach for most of these students, cutting into their time for subjects and activities they like more and are better at, chipping away at their self-esteem and, frankly, setting them up for greater math struggles up the chain. Because there is no acceptable alternative DC public middle school for most of these families to choose, parents and kids play along, scraping by with the math without necessarily building a solid foundation to handle more advanced math. Hanging in there on BASIS math is, after all, better than cutting and running to the burbs or stretching the family budget to the breaking point to pay for private school. Fundamentally, it's a poorly thought through arrangement that does a disservice to all involved. I blame DCPS more than BASIS, for continuing to pour crazy resources into snazzy middle and high school buildings that remain undersubscribed for lack of demand.


Hate to tell you this but you just typed 237 words when you could have just said, "I agree." Because that's what you did.

What you said is that the math at BASIS is too advanced for a lot of kids and there is no alternative for kids who hang in by a thread. You said parents opt to continue because it is better than their alternative. That's, as PP to whom you responded said, a choice available to parents.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most people on CH can’t afford to move or go private, so they are really stuck. However there are more charter high schools than the ones DCUM finds acceptable and many families I know send their kids to these high schools.


Total BS. Whether a family rents or buys on CH, the same money spent on rent and equity/mortgage payments could be spent on housing in the DC burbs. No middle-class family is stuck with mediocre or bad schooling options in Ward 6.


No, housing is relatively cheaper on the Hill. Many of us can’t trade up that easily.


Cheaper as compared to where? North and Central Arlington 3-bedroom houses and Hill houses are priced comparably (we've done lots of searching). Same with 3-bedroom rentals. Almost all of Fairfax and Falls Church and at least half of MoCo are cheaper than the Hill.



Not for schools that are clearly better.

NW DC, Arlington, Falls Church and MoCo zoned for the “good” schools have almosr nothing under $1m. 20002/20003 currently have 150+ 2br+ properties for under $1 mil. Fairfax is better but you start getting really deep into the burbs and trading off time for money.

This leaves families contemplating a move to the DCC or Richard Montgomery HS. At that point many Hill families will stick it out a bit longer to hope that Walls or McKinley or a cheaper Catholic HS will work out.

You keep saying this. But you've been told over and over again that things sell quickly in these areas so you just won't ever see lots of inventory at any price point. (At least not in the 7 years I've lived in Arlington.) There are never ever 150+ properties on the market in a single price range. You have to watch when things come up and pounce. It doesn't mean that there aren't options. It just means that they don't sit around.


This is not even remotely limited to Arlington. Houses in the Dc area sell fast. And i don’t know where you’re finding homes under 1 million on Capitol Hill. They don’t really exist.

As a final note- Arlington middle schools are not good.
There's some poster who is convinced there are >150 properties on the Hill for sale for less than $1m. That doesn't seem right to me, but I'm not going to waste my time checking. She has some crazy notion that there are endless cheap options on the Hill, but nothing at all is affordable in Arlington. (Of course her reference for Arlington is that nothing is listed the last week of July--literally the worst time to look for real estate in the DMV.).


“I don’t believe you and I’m not going to check but you’re wrong for sure.”

truly amazing


I checked. There is exactly 1 (one) 3 bedroom home on Capitol Hill under a million dollars. One. And the reason for the low price has mostly to do with the condition of the home. If you remove the filter for 3 bedrooms and choose 2 bedrooms and up, there are 5 homes for sale, and 4 of them are condos.

So whoever you are, stop being crazy and pretending there are tons of homes on the hill for sale for under a million. I wish there were- I would happily buy one!


Huh? You’re not using Redfin correctly or you have a very restricted definition of Capitol Hill. Try again because you’re wrong.

Signed, someone who will be selling a Maury-zoned house soon for around 900k.


NP. Out of morbid curiosity, I just looked on Redfin for 3 beds 2 bath on the Hill sold for under $1 million in the last 6 months. I came up with 7 properties, four of which sold for over $950k.


Who said we all live in 3br/2ba homes? And you’re probably not searching the entire SH/EH cachement (an extended definition of the Hill).

The reason this line of discussion came up here is to point out that “move to N Arlington where the schools are better” is not financially feasible for many Hill families facing down MS/HS (or upper elementary in the case of some schools). Many of us do not live in $1mil houses. Cashing out our home equity means either a) moving way out to Fairfax to get “good” schools or b) making a trade up to MoCo where it’s arguable whether the DCC HS are that much of an upgrade over waiting to see if something works out in DC.


Uhm, the EH boundary includes the entire Maury, Miner & Payne boundaries… That is way beyond even an extended definition of Capitol Hill. All the way out at like 24th & Benning?? No wonder people are saying CH real estate is cheap. CH means the Historic district + maybe out to the Starburst in NE & Congressional Cemetery in SE if we’re going with outer boundaries of neighborhood feel. In no world is 21st & anything “Capitol Hill.”


Most Payne and Maury families and many Miner consider themselves “Capitol Hill” families. And the situation is the same because we all face the same MS/HS dilemma. But sure, if you want to define away the problem, go ahead ….



“Most” Payne and “many” Miner… Probably the ones who live on or at least near Capitol Hill, or perhaps the ones sucked by real estate agents. It’s not defining the problem (which Ward 5 has as well) away to say that almost a mile from the Capitol Hill historic district does not equal Capitol Hill. Geographically Chinatown is closer to the Hill than 24th & Benning, that doesn’t make it Capitol Hill.

Also, when there’s a big discussion on whether people on the Hill could afford to sell their houses and move to Arlington, there’s obviously a huge difference in the answer for folks with houses in the Historic District ($1 million minimum with a few exceptions) and folks living out in an area where the average house seems to be $600K way on the other side of the Starburst. Defining everyone into Capitol Hill actually masks that people have very different options.


Newsflash, the list of people who care about the "historic district" designation includes the following:
-Septuagenarian and and octogenarian real estate agents who wear knits and ill fitting ankle length dresses
-Desperate people like you who want a cache that doesn't exist

For most families looking to buy homes for families the historic restrictions are a net negative. You seem sad and desperate. I'd also bet you $5k that you do not have and have not had school age kids at home for several years.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most people on CH can’t afford to move or go private, so they are really stuck. However there are more charter high schools than the ones DCUM finds acceptable and many families I know send their kids to these high schools.


Total BS. Whether a family rents or buys on CH, the same money spent on rent and equity/mortgage payments could be spent on housing in the DC burbs. No middle-class family is stuck with mediocre or bad schooling options in Ward 6.


No, housing is relatively cheaper on the Hill. Many of us can’t trade up that easily.


Cheaper as compared to where? North and Central Arlington 3-bedroom houses and Hill houses are priced comparably (we've done lots of searching). Same with 3-bedroom rentals. Almost all of Fairfax and Falls Church and at least half of MoCo are cheaper than the Hill.



Not for schools that are clearly better.

NW DC, Arlington, Falls Church and MoCo zoned for the “good” schools have almosr nothing under $1m. 20002/20003 currently have 150+ 2br+ properties for under $1 mil. Fairfax is better but you start getting really deep into the burbs and trading off time for money.

This leaves families contemplating a move to the DCC or Richard Montgomery HS. At that point many Hill families will stick it out a bit longer to hope that Walls or McKinley or a cheaper Catholic HS will work out.

You keep saying this. But you've been told over and over again that things sell quickly in these areas so you just won't ever see lots of inventory at any price point. (At least not in the 7 years I've lived in Arlington.) There are never ever 150+ properties on the market in a single price range. You have to watch when things come up and pounce. It doesn't mean that there aren't options. It just means that they don't sit around.


This is not even remotely limited to Arlington. Houses in the Dc area sell fast. And i don’t know where you’re finding homes under 1 million on Capitol Hill. They don’t really exist.

As a final note- Arlington middle schools are not good.
There's some poster who is convinced there are >150 properties on the Hill for sale for less than $1m. That doesn't seem right to me, but I'm not going to waste my time checking. She has some crazy notion that there are endless cheap options on the Hill, but nothing at all is affordable in Arlington. (Of course her reference for Arlington is that nothing is listed the last week of July--literally the worst time to look for real estate in the DMV.).


“I don’t believe you and I’m not going to check but you’re wrong for sure.”

truly amazing


I checked. There is exactly 1 (one) 3 bedroom home on Capitol Hill under a million dollars. One. And the reason for the low price has mostly to do with the condition of the home. If you remove the filter for 3 bedrooms and choose 2 bedrooms and up, there are 5 homes for sale, and 4 of them are condos.

So whoever you are, stop being crazy and pretending there are tons of homes on the hill for sale for under a million. I wish there were- I would happily buy one!


Huh? You’re not using Redfin correctly or you have a very restricted definition of Capitol Hill. Try again because you’re wrong.

Signed, someone who will be selling a Maury-zoned house soon for around 900k.


NP. Out of morbid curiosity, I just looked on Redfin for 3 beds 2 bath on the Hill sold for under $1 million in the last 6 months. I came up with 7 properties, four of which sold for over $950k.


Who said we all live in 3br/2ba homes? And you’re probably not searching the entire SH/EH cachement (an extended definition of the Hill).

The reason this line of discussion came up here is to point out that “move to N Arlington where the schools are better” is not financially feasible for many Hill families facing down MS/HS (or upper elementary in the case of some schools). Many of us do not live in $1mil houses. Cashing out our home equity means either a) moving way out to Fairfax to get “good” schools or b) making a trade up to MoCo where it’s arguable whether the DCC HS are that much of an upgrade over waiting to see if something works out in DC.


Uhm, the EH boundary includes the entire Maury, Miner & Payne boundaries… That is way beyond even an extended definition of Capitol Hill. All the way out at like 24th & Benning?? No wonder people are saying CH real estate is cheap. CH means the Historic district + maybe out to the Starburst in NE & Congressional Cemetery in SE if we’re going with outer boundaries of neighborhood feel. In no world is 21st & anything “Capitol Hill.”


Most Payne and Maury families and many Miner consider themselves “Capitol Hill” families. And the situation is the same because we all face the same MS/HS dilemma. But sure, if you want to define away the problem, go ahead ….



“Most” Payne and “many” Miner… Probably the ones who live on or at least near Capitol Hill, or perhaps the ones sucked by real estate agents. It’s not defining the problem (which Ward 5 has as well) away to say that almost a mile from the Capitol Hill historic district does not equal Capitol Hill. Geographically Chinatown is closer to the Hill than 24th & Benning, that doesn’t make it Capitol Hill.

Also, when there’s a big discussion on whether people on the Hill could afford to sell their houses and move to Arlington, there’s obviously a huge difference in the answer for folks with houses in the Historic District ($1 million minimum with a few exceptions) and folks living out in an area where the average house seems to be $600K way on the other side of the Starburst. Defining everyone into Capitol Hill actually masks that people have very different options.


Ok then, be sure to include an asterisk on your post: “This applies to those zoned for Jefferson and EH and SH who have at least $1.5 mil in home equity.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most people on CH can’t afford to move or go private, so they are really stuck. However there are more charter high schools than the ones DCUM finds acceptable and many families I know send their kids to these high schools.


Total BS. Whether a family rents or buys on CH, the same money spent on rent and equity/mortgage payments could be spent on housing in the DC burbs. No middle-class family is stuck with mediocre or bad schooling options in Ward 6.


No, housing is relatively cheaper on the Hill. Many of us can’t trade up that easily.


Cheaper as compared to where? North and Central Arlington 3-bedroom houses and Hill houses are priced comparably (we've done lots of searching). Same with 3-bedroom rentals. Almost all of Fairfax and Falls Church and at least half of MoCo are cheaper than the Hill.



Not for schools that are clearly better.

NW DC, Arlington, Falls Church and MoCo zoned for the “good” schools have almosr nothing under $1m. 20002/20003 currently have 150+ 2br+ properties for under $1 mil. Fairfax is better but you start getting really deep into the burbs and trading off time for money.

This leaves families contemplating a move to the DCC or Richard Montgomery HS. At that point many Hill families will stick it out a bit longer to hope that Walls or McKinley or a cheaper Catholic HS will work out.

You keep saying this. But you've been told over and over again that things sell quickly in these areas so you just won't ever see lots of inventory at any price point. (At least not in the 7 years I've lived in Arlington.) There are never ever 150+ properties on the market in a single price range. You have to watch when things come up and pounce. It doesn't mean that there aren't options. It just means that they don't sit around.


This is not even remotely limited to Arlington. Houses in the Dc area sell fast. And i don’t know where you’re finding homes under 1 million on Capitol Hill. They don’t really exist.

As a final note- Arlington middle schools are not good.
There's some poster who is convinced there are >150 properties on the Hill for sale for less than $1m. That doesn't seem right to me, but I'm not going to waste my time checking. She has some crazy notion that there are endless cheap options on the Hill, but nothing at all is affordable in Arlington. (Of course her reference for Arlington is that nothing is listed the last week of July--literally the worst time to look for real estate in the DMV.).


“I don’t believe you and I’m not going to check but you’re wrong for sure.”

truly amazing


I checked. There is exactly 1 (one) 3 bedroom home on Capitol Hill under a million dollars. One. And the reason for the low price has mostly to do with the condition of the home. If you remove the filter for 3 bedrooms and choose 2 bedrooms and up, there are 5 homes for sale, and 4 of them are condos.

So whoever you are, stop being crazy and pretending there are tons of homes on the hill for sale for under a million. I wish there were- I would happily buy one!


Huh? You’re not using Redfin correctly or you have a very restricted definition of Capitol Hill. Try again because you’re wrong.

Signed, someone who will be selling a Maury-zoned house soon for around 900k.


NP. Out of morbid curiosity, I just looked on Redfin for 3 beds 2 bath on the Hill sold for under $1 million in the last 6 months. I came up with 7 properties, four of which sold for over $950k.


Who said we all live in 3br/2ba homes? And you’re probably not searching the entire SH/EH cachement (an extended definition of the Hill).

The reason this line of discussion came up here is to point out that “move to N Arlington where the schools are better” is not financially feasible for many Hill families facing down MS/HS (or upper elementary in the case of some schools). Many of us do not live in $1mil houses. Cashing out our home equity means either a) moving way out to Fairfax to get “good” schools or b) making a trade up to MoCo where it’s arguable whether the DCC HS are that much of an upgrade over waiting to see if something works out in DC.


Uhm, the EH boundary includes the entire Maury, Miner & Payne boundaries… That is way beyond even an extended definition of Capitol Hill. All the way out at like 24th & Benning?? No wonder people are saying CH real estate is cheap. CH means the Historic district + maybe out to the Starburst in NE & Congressional Cemetery in SE if we’re going with outer boundaries of neighborhood feel. In no world is 21st & anything “Capitol Hill.”


Most Payne and Maury families and many Miner consider themselves “Capitol Hill” families. And the situation is the same because we all face the same MS/HS dilemma. But sure, if you want to define away the problem, go ahead ….



“Most” Payne and “many” Miner… Probably the ones who live on or at least near Capitol Hill, or perhaps the ones sucked by real estate agents. It’s not defining the problem (which Ward 5 has as well) away to say that almost a mile from the Capitol Hill historic district does not equal Capitol Hill. Geographically Chinatown is closer to the Hill than 24th & Benning, that doesn’t make it Capitol Hill.

Also, when there’s a big discussion on whether people on the Hill could afford to sell their houses and move to Arlington, there’s obviously a huge difference in the answer for folks with houses in the Historic District ($1 million minimum with a few exceptions) and folks living out in an area where the average house seems to be $600K way on the other side of the Starburst. Defining everyone into Capitol Hill actually masks that people have very different options.


Yes, we get it, loud and clear. You don't want to include any black families in your Capitol Hill definition.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm tired of hearing 4th grade parents we've come up through Brent with expressing shock and dismay (and more shock and dismay) that they're way down on the BASIS and Latins waiting lists.

If you don't like being around CH parents who planned ahead for middle school, who made Plan B, for goodness sakes, move. Find your own kind elsewhere.


Well I guarantee the feeling is mutual. None of your fellow Brent 4th grade parents enjoy listening to you expound upon what a genius you are for having a MS plan that doesn't rely on charters, either. Especially if that genius plan involves "buying a house 15 years ago" or "being rich" or "simply not caring about the quality of my kids' schools."

Maybe you're the one who needs to go "find your own kind" and by that I mean: smug a$$holes.


I went ahead and reported the "go find your own kind" post, because it sounded every type of -ist to me.

Meaning that you're desperately seeking -ists, particularly fantasists who go into the 5th grade charter lottery convinced that they'll win at the Latins or BASIS. You needn't look so hard for them: they abound on CH.


Huh?


NP, here but I've also met numerous CH parents who make the assumption they will get into Basis/Latin/Latin Cooper--even during MS (after the 5th grade entry year). I have NO clue on what they base this assumption, it's completely meritless.


Do they actually assume they'll get in, or do they hope they'll get in and plan to move if they don't, and then when they don't get in, they are disappointed about moving?

It sounds like you and the other PP are just mad about having neighbors or fellow school families ever talk about difficulties with the MS/HS path, because you have sorted it out and know exactly what you are doing. Great for you. But it's quite common for people on the Hill to not have a firm plan for MS, because not everyone plans their life 10 years in advance.

People move to the Hill and like it. They have kids and they like it even more, because CH is a great place to have a baby/toddler/preschooler. Then if they are IB for a good elementary (there are several) or luck into a decent charter (there are several), they stick around. At that point they know the deal with MS, but they figure maybe they'll get lucky with the lottery, or maybe they'll get more comfortable with the MS feed. And they don't just look at BASIS or Latin -- they look at ITS, the might see if they can get into a DCI feeder, they might consider TR's middle school option (until more recently it felt way more viable) or if they love Montessori, CHMS.

And if all that falls through, they move. And they are often sad about this. But apparently if they express this sadness or any frustration about the situation, they invoke your ire and judgment. Even though this is extremely common on CH and pretty much everyone knows multiple families who have been through it.

One day something will not work out the way you plan, and I hope people offer you zero empathy as well because you won't deserve it.


Perhaps it's because I grew up in poverty and trauma, I never expect empathy from others. And I always have Plan B, Plan C, etc. We knew we wanted to stay on the Hill so planned accordingly to ensure we weren't reliant on a nefarious lottery and the woeful other MS and HS options. Given the precarious nature of MS and HS on the Hill, to do otherwise is foolish.


This. Different background, similar idea. I did not grow up in poverty - just solidly middle class. My parents worked in K12 education and knew what to look for when it comes to school quality beyond test scores and demographics. I went to Title I schools from elementary on up. I was always one of the wealthiest kids - even with teacher parents - had a more stable home life than many of my classmates and was in the minority as a white kid. My parents did not supplement other than encouraging me to read anything I wanted and then discussing it with me. All of my public schools did offer gifted classes, which I took in some subjects, not all.

I graduated with lots of AP credits, made friends with fellow nerds from all backgrounds, got a master's, make a good living in a competitive field. My sibling went to the same schools and is now a doctor, with a degree from a top med school. But more importantly, as adults, we both have a better understanding of the world and people who aren't like us than most kids who grew up white and middle class. It's served us well professionally and even better personally.

I want the same for my kid and it's made me much more open minded about schools than many folks who post on DCUM, which I guess can be a low bar. Knowing things change or don't turn out like you expect, I've got a Plan A, Plan B, Plan C, Plan D, mostly not requiring lottery luck. We may end up a bad commute if Plan A or B doesn't work, but I think we have found or will find a path that will allow my kid to graduate well prepared for whatever comes next.
Anonymous
Let’s see. You teach at a suburban middle school yet you are somehow an expert on Basis. In fact, your “analysis” is way off.

-The curriculum at Basis is advanced across the board, not just in math. Just take a course catalogue.

-There is plenty of flexibility in taking courses (even though Basis is a lot smaller than many suburban schools), especially starting in high school. Some students take Calc BC in 10th grade; some never take it at all. Some students take an AP class in 8th grade; some don’t. All students start taking AP classes in 9th grade; some end up taking 6 AP classes but others take 10-15. After the first few years, there is effectively tracking at Basis.

-Lots of parents at Big 3 private schools supplement with tutors and camps. Just read the posts on the private school board. That says nothing about the curriculum.

-Basis is a great option for a lot of families, including those on the Hill, who didn’t want to flee to the suburbs. If you don’t want your kid to be challenged, don’t send him or her to Basis.

*NP. We're on the Hill. We left BASIS for Gonzaga last year and couldn't disagree more with the post 2 posts above. The curriculum at BASIS is "advanced" across the board as compared to which? That of DCPS?

My kid needed remedial writing work the summer before 9th grade after studying English with a series of weak, just-out-of-grad-school teachers with weak classroom management skills at BASIS. One of the teachers used to cry in front of the class when the kids got very rowdy. Gonzaga insisted on the writing work.

My kid arrived at high school with two years of iffy middle school Spanish instruction (BASIS now teaches languages from only from 8th grade and only at the beginning level), while most of his classmates started studying Spanish in the Upper ES grades at suburban and private schools. He was placed in Spanish 2 while classmates started in Spanish, 3, 4 or 5 (out of 6 levels).

My kid needed to repeat both geometry and algebra II at Gonzaga after having failed to master too many concepts, despite having earned As in math throughout his BASIS years. He came in a couple years ahead in science, I'll give BASIS that. He was also behind on standard extra-curriculars, sports, music, debate. In our experience, outside science instruction, BASIS is meh.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
*NP. We're on the Hill. We left BASIS for Gonzaga last year and couldn't disagree more with the post 2 posts above. The curriculum at BASIS is "advanced" across the board as compared to which? That of DCPS?

My kid needed remedial writing work the summer before 9th grade after studying English with a series of weak, just-out-of-grad-school teachers with weak classroom management skills at BASIS. One of the teachers used to cry in front of the class when the kids got very rowdy. Gonzaga insisted on the writing work.

My kid arrived at high school with two years of iffy middle school Spanish instruction (BASIS now teaches languages from only from 8th grade and only at the beginning level), while most of his classmates started studying Spanish in the Upper ES grades at suburban and private schools. He was placed in Spanish 2 while classmates started in Spanish, 3, 4 or 5 (out of 6 levels).

My kid needed to repeat both geometry and algebra II at Gonzaga after having failed to master too many concepts, despite having earned As in math throughout his BASIS years. He came in a couple years ahead in science, I'll give BASIS that. He was also behind on standard extra-curriculars, sports, music, debate. In our experience, outside science instruction, BASIS is meh.


NP. Yes, as compared to other free schools. Sounds like your kid didn't excel in English or languages. That's ok. Weird you blame others for that though.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most people on CH can’t afford to move or go private, so they are really stuck. However there are more charter high schools than the ones DCUM finds acceptable and many families I know send their kids to these high schools.


Total BS. Whether a family rents or buys on CH, the same money spent on rent and equity/mortgage payments could be spent on housing in the DC burbs. No middle-class family is stuck with mediocre or bad schooling options in Ward 6.


No, housing is relatively cheaper on the Hill. Many of us can’t trade up that easily.


Cheaper as compared to where? North and Central Arlington 3-bedroom houses and Hill houses are priced comparably (we've done lots of searching). Same with 3-bedroom rentals. Almost all of Fairfax and Falls Church and at least half of MoCo are cheaper than the Hill.



Not for schools that are clearly better.

NW DC, Arlington, Falls Church and MoCo zoned for the “good” schools have almosr nothing under $1m. 20002/20003 currently have 150+ 2br+ properties for under $1 mil. Fairfax is better but you start getting really deep into the burbs and trading off time for money.

This leaves families contemplating a move to the DCC or Richard Montgomery HS. At that point many Hill families will stick it out a bit longer to hope that Walls or McKinley or a cheaper Catholic HS will work out.

You keep saying this. But you've been told over and over again that things sell quickly in these areas so you just won't ever see lots of inventory at any price point. (At least not in the 7 years I've lived in Arlington.) There are never ever 150+ properties on the market in a single price range. You have to watch when things come up and pounce. It doesn't mean that there aren't options. It just means that they don't sit around.


This is not even remotely limited to Arlington. Houses in the Dc area sell fast. And i don’t know where you’re finding homes under 1 million on Capitol Hill. They don’t really exist.

As a final note- Arlington middle schools are not good.
There's some poster who is convinced there are >150 properties on the Hill for sale for less than $1m. That doesn't seem right to me, but I'm not going to waste my time checking. She has some crazy notion that there are endless cheap options on the Hill, but nothing at all is affordable in Arlington. (Of course her reference for Arlington is that nothing is listed the last week of July--literally the worst time to look for real estate in the DMV.).


“I don’t believe you and I’m not going to check but you’re wrong for sure.”

truly amazing


I checked. There is exactly 1 (one) 3 bedroom home on Capitol Hill under a million dollars. One. And the reason for the low price has mostly to do with the condition of the home. If you remove the filter for 3 bedrooms and choose 2 bedrooms and up, there are 5 homes for sale, and 4 of them are condos.

So whoever you are, stop being crazy and pretending there are tons of homes on the hill for sale for under a million. I wish there were- I would happily buy one!


Huh? You’re not using Redfin correctly or you have a very restricted definition of Capitol Hill. Try again because you’re wrong.

Signed, someone who will be selling a Maury-zoned house soon for around 900k.


NP. Out of morbid curiosity, I just looked on Redfin for 3 beds 2 bath on the Hill sold for under $1 million in the last 6 months. I came up with 7 properties, four of which sold for over $950k.


Who said we all live in 3br/2ba homes? And you’re probably not searching the entire SH/EH cachement (an extended definition of the Hill).

The reason this line of discussion came up here is to point out that “move to N Arlington where the schools are better” is not financially feasible for many Hill families facing down MS/HS (or upper elementary in the case of some schools). Many of us do not live in $1mil houses. Cashing out our home equity means either a) moving way out to Fairfax to get “good” schools or b) making a trade up to MoCo where it’s arguable whether the DCC HS are that much of an upgrade over waiting to see if something works out in DC.


Uhm, the EH boundary includes the entire Maury, Miner & Payne boundaries… That is way beyond even an extended definition of Capitol Hill. All the way out at like 24th & Benning?? No wonder people are saying CH real estate is cheap. CH means the Historic district + maybe out to the Starburst in NE & Congressional Cemetery in SE if we’re going with outer boundaries of neighborhood feel. In no world is 21st & anything “Capitol Hill.”


Most Payne and Maury families and many Miner consider themselves “Capitol Hill” families. And the situation is the same because we all face the same MS/HS dilemma. But sure, if you want to define away the problem, go ahead ….



“Most” Payne and “many” Miner… Probably the ones who live on or at least near Capitol Hill, or perhaps the ones sucked by real estate agents. It’s not defining the problem (which Ward 5 has as well) away to say that almost a mile from the Capitol Hill historic district does not equal Capitol Hill. Geographically Chinatown is closer to the Hill than 24th & Benning, that doesn’t make it Capitol Hill.

Also, when there’s a big discussion on whether people on the Hill could afford to sell their houses and move to Arlington, there’s obviously a huge difference in the answer for folks with houses in the Historic District ($1 million minimum with a few exceptions) and folks living out in an area where the average house seems to be $600K way on the other side of the Starburst. Defining everyone into Capitol Hill actually masks that people have very different options.


Newsflash, the list of people who care about the "historic district" designation includes the following:
-Septuagenarian and and octogenarian real estate agents who wear knits and ill fitting ankle length dresses
-Desperate people like you who want a cache that doesn't exist

For most families looking to buy homes for families the historic restrictions are a net negative. You seem sad and desperate. I'd also bet you $5k that you do not have and have not had school age kids at home for several years.


You really think the author of this post was asking if folks previously living at 22nd & Benning regretted that they moved to the NW or burbs? Sure. Whatever. We can talk about everyone EOTP having middle school issues... that's absolutely true. That's still not "Capitol Hill," which is what this post was actually asking about.
Anonymous
We lived near eastern market and had major angst about moving to nw when our daughter was 1. She is now 10. We lived in Shepherd park, next to rock creek park, have a great community, yard and love it! No regrets. Definitely feels more city than suburbs although different than Capitol Hill. But our needs have changed with kids and we’re closer to what we need.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most people on CH can’t afford to move or go private, so they are really stuck. However there are more charter high schools than the ones DCUM finds acceptable and many families I know send their kids to these high schools.


Total BS. Whether a family rents or buys on CH, the same money spent on rent and equity/mortgage payments could be spent on housing in the DC burbs. No middle-class family is stuck with mediocre or bad schooling options in Ward 6.


No, housing is relatively cheaper on the Hill. Many of us can’t trade up that easily.


Cheaper as compared to where? North and Central Arlington 3-bedroom houses and Hill houses are priced comparably (we've done lots of searching). Same with 3-bedroom rentals. Almost all of Fairfax and Falls Church and at least half of MoCo are cheaper than the Hill.


Not for schools that are clearly better.

NW DC, Arlington, Falls Church and MoCo zoned for the “good” schools have almosr nothing under $1m. 20002/20003 currently have 150+ 2br+ properties for under $1 mil. Fairfax is better but you start getting really deep into the burbs and trading off time for money.

This leaves families contemplating a move to the DCC or Richard Montgomery HS. At that point many Hill families will stick it out a bit longer to hope that Walls or McKinley or a cheaper Catholic HS will work out.

You keep saying this. But you've been told over and over again that things sell quickly in these areas so you just won't ever see lots of inventory at any price point. (At least not in the 7 years I've lived in Arlington.) There are never ever 150+ properties on the market in a single price range. You have to watch when things come up and pounce. It doesn't mean that there aren't options. It just means that they don't sit around.


This is not even remotely limited to Arlington. Houses in the Dc area sell fast. And i don’t know where you’re finding homes under 1 million on Capitol Hill. They don’t really exist.

As a final note- Arlington middle schools are not good.
There's some poster who is convinced there are >150 properties on the Hill for sale for less than $1m. That doesn't seem right to me, but I'm not going to waste my time checking. She has some crazy notion that there are endless cheap options on the Hill, but nothing at all is affordable in Arlington. (Of course her reference for Arlington is that nothing is listed the last week of July--literally the worst time to look for real estate in the DMV.).


“I don’t believe you and I’m not going to check but you’re wrong for sure.”

truly amazing


I checked. There is exactly 1 (one) 3 bedroom home on Capitol Hill under a million dollars. One. And the reason for the low price has mostly to do with the condition of the home. If you remove the filter for 3 bedrooms and choose 2 bedrooms and up, there are 5 homes for sale, and 4 of them are condos.

So whoever you are, stop being crazy and pretending there are tons of homes on the hill for sale for under a million. I wish there were- I would happily buy one!


Huh? You’re not using Redfin correctly or you have a very restricted definition of Capitol Hill. Try again because you’re wrong.

Signed, someone who will be selling a Maury-zoned house soon for around 900k.


NP. Out of morbid curiosity, I just looked on Redfin for 3 beds 2 bath on the Hill sold for under $1 million in the last 6 months. I came up with 7 properties, four of which sold for over $950k.


Who said we all live in 3br/2ba homes? And you’re probably not searching the entire SH/EH cachement (an extended definition of the Hill).

The reason this line of discussion came up here is to point out that “move to N Arlington where the schools are better” is not financially feasible for many Hill families facing down MS/HS (or upper elementary in the case of some schools). Many of us do not live in $1mil houses. Cashing out our home equity means either a) moving way out to Fairfax to get “good” schools or b) making a trade up to MoCo where it’s arguable whether the DCC HS are that much of an upgrade over waiting to see if something works out in DC.


Uhm, the EH boundary includes the entire Maury, Miner & Payne boundaries… That is way beyond even an extended definition of Capitol Hill. All the way out at like 24th & Benning?? No wonder people are saying CH real estate is cheap. CH means the Historic district + maybe out to the Starburst in NE & Congressional Cemetery in SE if we’re going with outer boundaries of neighborhood feel. In no world is 21st & anything “Capitol Hill.”


Most Payne and Maury families and many Miner consider themselves “Capitol Hill” families. And the situation is the same because we all face the same MS/HS dilemma. But sure, if you want to define away the problem, go ahead ….



“Most” Payne and “many” Miner… Probably the ones who live on or at least near Capitol Hill, or perhaps the ones sucked by real estate agents. It’s not defining the problem (which Ward 5 has as well) away to say that almost a mile from the Capitol Hill historic district does not equal Capitol Hill. Geographically Chinatown is closer to the Hill than 24th & Benning, that doesn’t make it Capitol Hill.

Also, when there’s a big discussion on whether people on the Hill could afford to sell their houses and move to Arlington, there’s obviously a huge difference in the answer for folks with houses in the Historic District ($1 million minimum with a few exceptions) and folks living out in an area where the average house seems to be $600K way on the other side of the Starburst. Defining everyone into Capitol Hill actually masks that people have very different options.


Newsflash, the list of people who care about the "historic district" designation includes the following:
-Septuagenarian and and octogenarian real estate agents who wear knits and ill fitting ankle length dresses
-Desperate people like you who want a cache that doesn't exist

For most families looking to buy homes for families the historic restrictions are a net negative. You seem sad and desperate. I'd also bet you $5k that you do not have and have not had school age kids at home for several years.


You really think the author of this post was asking if folks previously living at 22nd & Benning regretted that they moved to the NW or burbs? Sure. Whatever. We can talk about everyone EOTP having middle school issues... that's absolutely true. That's still not "Capitol Hill," which is what this post was actually asking about.


NP. That's a straw man. The entire point of this conversation is to discuss school options for people in Capitol Hill elementaries that feed to Eastern, which is viewed by most as a non-starter. EH, SH, and JA are viewed as borderline by some, unacceptable by many (though a major reason they are deemed unacceptable is specifically because they feed to Eastern).

So excluding families zoned for Maury, Payne, Tyler, even Van Ness or JO Wilson (neither of which are on the Hill but feed to schools on the Hill) makes little sense. The conversation obviously includes people in Hill East and really anywhere in Ward 6 where the feeder schools might prompt people to move.

This isn't about who gets to claim they live on the Hill (no one cares!), it's about how families who move because they are dissatisfied with educational options on the Hill, which are accessed by people outside the strict borders of not only the historic district (which is quite small) but even the broader Capitol Hill area. All these families face similar issues, regardless of whether they live at 4th and East Cap or 9th and I St NE or 4th and L SE.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: