Tourist submersible missing on visit to Titanic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What mom would allow her spouse to take her son on this trip?

He was an adult….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What mom would allow her spouse to take her son on this trip?

+100000
Seriously its unbelieavable.

[Anonymous]

I haven't read this entire thread but was this the first time the trip was taken? It might not sound so dangerous if this had been done previously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What mom would allow her spouse to take her son on this trip?

He was an adult….

Yes he is… but he is still a mother’s son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I haven't read this entire thread but was this the first time the trip was taken? It might not sound so dangerous if this had been done previously.

This is the 3rd time this trip has been taken.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What mom would allow her spouse to take her son on this trip?

He was an adult….

I’d leave my husband if he insisted on taking my adult child or child child on something like this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are you people picking on the fact that they were rich? I don’t understand how it’s relevant.

It’s wrong to pick on them though I do think it’s relevant. Bring rich gives people access to do some risky things that make them feel special: Private planes, trips into space, race cars, the depths of the sea…and they do a lot of these things without the knowledge or respect for the seriousness of the adventures.

I’m married to a not rich pilot. I can tell you I would never fly in a private plane and I would never think I could fly myself to my cousins wedding at night. Because I understand the training needed and how important is. Their confidence and money sometimes kill them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m married to a not rich pilot. I can tell you I would never fly in a private plane

Hey there hypocrite. You're not rich pilot spouse first learned to fly and took his first solo in a private plane.

What is this, the shit on anyone who makes more than $75k a year thread? Why the aggression toward her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you people picking on the fact that they were rich? I don’t understand how it’s relevant.

It’s wrong to pick on them though I do think it’s relevant. Bring rich gives people access to do some risky things that make them feel special: Private planes, trips into space, race cars, the depths of the sea…and they do a lot of these things without the knowledge or respect for the seriousness of the adventures.

I’m married to a not rich pilot. I can tell you I would never fly in a private plane and I would never think I could fly myself to my cousins wedding at night. Because I understand the training needed and how important is. Their confidence and money sometimes kill them.

The rich people are the reason this trip could take place, which was not just a sightseeing tour, it’s other purpose is to monitor the titanic site from a preservation and identification perspective.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m married to a not rich pilot. I can tell you I would never fly in a private plane

Hey there hypocrite. You're not rich pilot spouse first learned to fly and took his first solo in a private plane.

What is this, the shit on anyone who makes more than $75k a year thread? Why the aggression toward her?

Also nice edit lmfao.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What mom would allow her spouse to take her son on this trip?

He was an adult….

I’d leave my husband if he insisted on taking my adult child or child child on something like this.

My now ex wanted to take my us over the Grand Canyon by helicopter. In no way would I allow this. I held us back. The next week the same tour crashed.

[Anonymous]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12215003/OceanGate-REFUSED-independent-inspection-missing-sub-fired-worker-raised-safety-concerns.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12215855/Submersible-experts-wrote-OceanGates-missing-CEO-Stockton-Rush-2018.html

Unconscionable hubris

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What mom would allow her spouse to take her son on this trip?

A soon to be single billionaire mom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you people picking on the fact that they were rich? I don’t understand how it’s relevant.

It’s wrong to pick on them though I do think it’s relevant. Bring rich gives people access to do some risky things that make them feel special: Private planes, trips into space, race cars, the depths of the sea…and they do a lot of these things without the knowledge or respect for the seriousness of the adventures.

I’m married to a not rich pilot. I can tell you I would never fly in a private plane and I would never think I could fly myself to my cousins wedding at night. Because I understand the training needed and how important is. Their confidence and money sometimes kill them.

The rich people are the reason this trip could take place, which was not just a sightseeing tour, it’s other purpose is to monitor the titanic site from a preservation and identification perspective.

Bullshit. We don’t need manned subs to perform those activities. This was an unnecessary risk that cost 5 people their lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of unconfirmed reports on Twitter about tapping sounds being picked up by sonar

It really doesn’t matter. I don’t think there’s a way to get them up or out. I hope they have Valium and/or sleeping pills and the ceo told them they have enough oxygen for 4 days so they aren’t aware of what’s actually happening when they become oxygen deprived.

Why would they have sleeping pills for what was supposed to be a 3 hour tour?

Valium is oils be good. I was thinking that one of the people on board could panic and actually strangle and kill someone else on board in a fit of panic. They are very close together and there is no where to escape. Terrible situation.