M.lynch managing director, will he get fired?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dude has apparently been arrested. His life is over. Moron.

25 year successful career with ML, spotless record.....what a complete dumbass, moron.

I hear the Trump 2024 campaign is hiring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dude has apparently been arrested. His life is over. Moron.

25 year successful career with ML, spotless record.....what a complete dumbass, moron.

He’s a bozo who must be lying about being 48

I dunno - he looks like a typical worn out 48 year old to me.

Doesn't look a day younger than 56.

That's what I was thinking. I'm 48 and he looks at least 10 years older than me and everyone I know who's my age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not excusing his behavior but he does not deserve to be fired for this. Search smoothie on You tube and the videos call him Karen. He did not act like the Karen from the park who called cops on the bird watcher guy because he was black. This guy became unhinged for a valid reason. And even after throwing the drink he says he will leave if they give the number and they refuse. He is not obnoxious after that towards the end of the video.

He has a phone with access to the internet. Google “Robeks” +”corporate phone number.” Done,

He didn’t need them to give him a phone number. He was trying to intimidate them and it gloriously and deservedly backfired.

He already had the corporate number because he said he called it and it was busy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dude has apparently been arrested. His life is over. Moron.

25 year successful career with ML, spotless record.....what a complete dumbass, moron.

He’s a bozo who must be lying about being 48

I dunno - he looks like a typical worn out 48 year old to me.

I’m 49 and was shocked to see that he was 48.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If his son truly had that extreme of a reaction went unconscious and was taken via ambulance to ER he should have been at the hospital with his son. Not back at the store "a short time later" according to police.

He told them is son ALMOST went to the hospital.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question: why would someone specify "no peanuts" in a smoothie UNLESS the drink was for someone with allergies? I mean would someone walk in and say "Kale and spinach smoothie, no peanuts" just because they don't like peanuts? Would the store print that request on the receipt as happened here? And if there is some other reason to specify no specific ingredient, should the server ASK if there is an allergy?

I agree that the dad acted badly. But I do not think he should have lost his job. I DO think the kids should lose their jobs. Why the difference? The dad's bad behavior wasn't related to his job at all. If people want to chose another fin adviser they can, but the rate of return his customers get from their investments is not affected by what he did. Nobody can sue Merrill Lynch based on what the dad did. ML is firing him due to the bad publicity.

The kids' mistakes were related to their jobs. There is no question that there was a 911 call from the dad's home about 45 minutes after he bought the smoothie. If the son died, the smoothie store would be facing a wrongful death action. As it is, the son probably has a case for negligence against it.

The fact that the kids' attitude was so cavalier indicates that they had not received sufficient training from their employer about food allergies. That is negligence.

Yes. All the time.

Absolutely. I don't like the taste of something, I just ask for it to be removed or subbed. Including types of nuts.

That smoothie shop btw has 3 smoothies with peanut butter. All of which use it as the base.

Judging by the fact that he ordered it for a 17-year-old teen boy, who love to 'bulk', I'm guessing it was the 800 LB Gorilla. The second ingredient (which means the second most plentiful) is peanut butter. Kid had a death wish.

Lots of stupid to go around, he didn't communicate to the stupid workers what happened so how are they supposed to learn

Turns out it gets worse. Out of the 3 smoothies identified it has been confirmed by actual on-camera reporters that this guy ordered...drumroll please...

a P'NUT POWER PLUS SMOOTHIE!!!

Yes. He ordered the smoothie with the name Peanut in its title for his deathly allergic son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone has a video camera in their hand. Behave accordingly. It's 2022. Who is not aware of this fact?!

Also, the fact that anyone would defend this behavior means many of you are tolerating some awful behavior in your own lives. If my DH, brother, or any other man I knew did this, I would be horrified. This is way outside of my normal.

He was aware he was being filmed and he still chose thise behaviors. So stupid. I think he was truly out of control and I very much doubt this was isolated behavior. Bet it doesn't surprise folks that know him well at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He said no peanut butter
He check receipt no peanut butter
His son went into shock transported to hospital
He yelled at the staff for almost killing son.
He was fired his job.
He was publicly lunched

White girls posted this to get clicks and ruin the guys life.

Meanwhile it should have been dealt with via police or perhaps lawsuit.

Funny the actually folks he yelled at did not post it

No. He ruined his own life with his behavior. If he hadn’t thrown a racist adult temper tantrum in public, there would have been nothing to post.

Next!

Totally. The only thing I agree with is the bolded and its not because of the way PP depicted it. The guy should have collected his receipt and calmly called his lawyer on retainer to sue the establishment. End of story. Now he's out a $2 million a year job and defending himself in criminal court and possibly civil court. He may still sue the smoothie shop but the damage is already done.

You gonna sue them for because he didn’t say peanut allergy I just said no peanut butter because it’s in a place that has all kinds of cross-contamination there may have been some nut dust that got in the smooth he ordered he should sue his dumb ass self.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question: why would someone specify "no peanuts" in a smoothie UNLESS the drink was for someone with allergies? I mean would someone walk in and say "Kale and spinach smoothie, no peanuts" just because they don't like peanuts? Would the store print that request on the receipt as happened here? And if there is some other reason to specify no specific ingredient, should the server ASK if there is an allergy?

I agree that the dad acted badly. But I do not think he should have lost his job. I DO think the kids should lose their jobs. Why the difference? The dad's bad behavior wasn't related to his job at all. If people want to chose another fin adviser they can, but the rate of return his customers get from their investments is not affected by what he did. Nobody can sue Merrill Lynch based on what the dad did. ML is firing him due to the bad publicity.

The kids' mistakes were related to their jobs. There is no question that there was a 911 call from the dad's home about 45 minutes after he bought the smoothie. If the son died, the smoothie store would be facing a wrongful death action. As it is, the son probably has a case for negligence against it.

The fact that the kids' attitude was so cavalier indicates that they had not received sufficient training from their employer about food allergies. That is negligence.

He did not indicate allergies you idiot he just said no peanut butter I order stuff from menus and ask certain things to be removed or swapped out but I don’t have allergies I just don’t like them.
Yes. All the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
He did not indicate allergies you idiot he just said no peanut butter I order stuff from menus and ask certain things to be removed or swapped out but I don’t have allergies I just don’t like them.
Yes. All the time.

He said no peanut butter because my son's allergic. But if you want to split hairs he didn't say "allergy".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
He did not indicate allergies you idiot he just said no peanut butter I order stuff from menus and ask certain things to be removed or swapped out but I don’t have allergies I just don’t like them.
Yes. All the time.

He said no peanut butter because my son's allergic. But if you want to split hairs he didn't say "allergy".

Where are you getting that info? Can you link it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
He did not indicate allergies you idiot he just said no peanut butter I order stuff from menus and ask certain things to be removed or swapped out but I don’t have allergies I just don’t like them.
Yes. All the time.

He said no peanut butter because my son's allergic. But if you want to split hairs he didn't say "allergy".

BS. Just because he’s now claiming it doesn’t make it true. It’s called CYA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
He did not indicate allergies you idiot he just said no peanut butter I order stuff from menus and ask certain things to be removed or swapped out but I don’t have allergies I just don’t like them.
Yes. All the time.

He said no peanut butter because my son's allergic. But if you want to split hairs he didn't say "allergy".

“According to police, employees reported Iannazzo never mentioned a peanut allergy, but only asked that them not to put peanut butter in the drink.”

You can go find the change.org petition for him to get his job back which has zero signatures.

[Anonymous]

That's a seriously rough 48.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That's a seriously rough 48.

As my farmer grandfather would say. “rode hard and put away wet.”