M.lynch managing director, will he get fired?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guilty of being a good parent

Good parents prepare at the start, rather than reacting violently at the end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guilty of being a good parent

+1 I would have found forgiveness for the Robeks girls if they owned covering for their coworkers and if the acknowledged that "he's allergic", while not saying the lexigraphical word "allergy" makes it exceedingly clear. They should not have hidden the part of him trying desperately trying to get the ingredients and getting cut off. The shop was EMPTY when he came in with no line. Robeks used to be my favorite, but I no longer shop there.

[Anonymous]

If he behaved the Robles idiots would be fired, but he didn't and it turned on him and he was fired and the idiots working there look like saints

[Anonymous]

If he behaved the Robles idiots would be fired, but he didn't and it turned on him and he was fired and the idiots working there look like saints

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty of being a good parent

+1 I would have found forgiveness for the Robeks girls if they owned covering for their coworkers and if the acknowledged that "he's allergic", while not saying the lexigraphical word "allergy" makes it exceedingly clear. They should not have hidden the part of him trying desperately trying to get the ingredients and getting cut off. The shop was EMPTY when he came in with no line. Robeks used to be my favorite, but I no longer shop there.

What are you talking about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guilty of being a good parent

Yeah, sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty of being a good parent

+1 I would have found forgiveness for the Robeks girls if they owned covering for their coworkers and if the acknowledged that "he's allergic", while not saying the lexigraphical word "allergy" makes it exceedingly clear. They should not have hidden the part of him trying desperately trying to get the ingredients and getting cut off. The shop was EMPTY when he came in with no line. Robeks used to be my favorite, but I no longer shop there.

Tell us more about where you are getting this info from, PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guilty of being a good parent

Guilty of being a lazy, crap parent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guilty of being a good parent

Based on his behavior in the video, I think there’s a decent chance he’s at least verbally or emotionally abusive to his family.

At best, the guy has anger management issues. (Not saying that he doesn’t have the right to be angry. But clearly he does not always have enough self-control to express his anger in a productive, non-absuive way.)

More likely, he is a control freak who has lost his sh*t in all sorts of situations when things go wrong. They guy who’s always screaming at his assistants, engaging in road rage, yelling from the sidelines at his kids’ coaches or refs etc. You know the type.

So a “good parent”? Maybe. But my bet is he’s the guy whose family walks around on eggshells, remembering the time last week when he screamed at and demeaned his kid for loading the dishwasher wrong. Classic bully.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty of being a good parent

+1 I would have found forgiveness for the Robeks girls if they owned covering for their coworkers and if the acknowledged that "he's allergic", while not saying the lexigraphical word "allergy" makes it exceedingly clear. They should not have hidden the part of him trying desperately trying to get the ingredients and getting cut off. The shop was EMPTY when he came in with no line. Robeks used to be my favorite, but I no longer shop there.

Do tell us more. You mean he wanted to find out if the peanut butter smoothie he ordered contained peanut butter because his son who is allergic to peanuts reacted to the peanut butter smoothie?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty of being a good parent

Based on his behavior in the video, I think there’s a decent chance he’s at least verbally or emotionally abusive to his family.

At best, the guy has anger management issues. (Not saying that he doesn’t have the right to be angry. But clearly he does not always have enough self-control to express his anger in a productive, non-absuive way.)

More likely, he is a control freak who has lost his sh*t in all sorts of situations when things go wrong. They guy who’s always screaming at his assistants, engaging in road rage, yelling from the sidelines at his kids’ coaches or refs etc. You know the type.

So a “good parent”? Maybe. But my bet is he’s the guy whose family walks around on eggshells, remembering the time last week when he screamed at and demeaned his kid for loading the dishwasher wrong. Classic bully.

+1 This. what kid with a deadly allergy to peanuts orders a peanut smoothie without the peanut butter. Just get vanilla or don’t go to the store that has peanut particles floating around (cross contaminants for spoons.). And what kind of behavior are you modeling for your (privileged) teenage child by calling a hard working teenager an immigrant loser?

[Anonymous]

from the Daily Mail (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10764703/Disgraced-financier-fired-racist-smoothie-tossing-rant-sent-rehab-dodges-criminal-conviction.html):

Disgraced Merrill Lynch financier, 48, who was fired for a racist smoothie-throwing tirade at Robeks is ordered to go to REHAB and pay $500 to victim as he dodges criminal conviction

James Iannazzo, 48, agreed to participate in one-year rehabilitation program to avoid a criminal conviction on Thursday

The disgraced financier was filmed hurling smoothies and slurs at the teenage employees of a Connecticut smoothie store in January

Iannazzo went into a rage after the employees put peanut butter in his sons smoothie and he went into anaphylactic shock

'You f**king immigrant loser' Iannazzo yelled in the video. He was fired from Merrill Lynch after over twenty-five years of employment soon after the incident

[Anonymous]

Rehab hmm? Wonder what he was addicted to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty of being a good parent

Based on his behavior in the video, I think there’s a decent chance he’s at least verbally or emotionally abusive to his family.

At best, the guy has anger management issues. (Not saying that he doesn’t have the right to be angry. But clearly he does not always have enough self-control to express his anger in a productive, non-absuive way.)

More likely, he is a control freak who has lost his sh*t in all sorts of situations when things go wrong. They guy who’s always screaming at his assistants, engaging in road rage, yelling from the sidelines at his kids’ coaches or refs etc. You know the type.

So a “good parent”? Maybe. But my bet is he’s the guy whose family walks around on eggshells, remembering the time last week when he screamed at and demeaned his kid for loading the dishwasher wrong. Classic bully.

+1 This. what kid with a deadly allergy to peanuts orders a peanut smoothie without the peanut butter. Just get vanilla or don’t go to the store that has peanut particles floating around (cross contaminants for spoons.). And what kind of behavior are you modeling for your (privileged) teenage child by calling a hard working teenager an immigrant loser?

There is no way, no way, that the doctors said “we need you to go immediately to the smoothie shop and get a list of ingredients.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rehab hmm? Wonder what he was addicted to.

He is a rage-aholic