M.lynch managing director, will he get fired?

[Anonymous]

Don't order food or a smoothie from a palace that has peanut butter or nuts even if they are not in the drink ordered .Simple as that. This is on him.
In a restaurant even if the server knows it and the chef knows it, the food runner and other severs might miss it, and ofcourse there's cross-contamination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How hard is it to make a smoothie?

If your kid has an allergy that is that severe, then why take the risk?

My kid has a shellfish allergy so, we don't go to seafood restaurants as a general rule.

If we are in a restaurant that also serves shellfish, we limit what we order off of the menu.

Is said allergen cooked in the same oil as the other, not allergenic food? Answer: Yes = don't order. Answer: Don't know? = don't order, Answer: no. = Then maybe order...why risk that a hurried waiter or kid waiter, cares enough to ask, observe or enforce. Because my DCs life is my responsibility, who else cares as much as I do, I have the epi-pen ready just in case.

Hope for best prepare for the worst, but my first instinct wouldn't be to beat up the teenager who made the food item.

I would feel shame as a parent and concern for my kid.

This guy clearly felt heavy-duty guilt, he almost killed his kid, because he's the one who found it easier to go to the store and buy a smoothie, rather than make one at home, or have his kid make his own smoothie at home.

It's a smoothie, no one needs a store-bought smoothie.

Learn to manage your anger people, and if you can't squash it then directing it inward, and beating yourself up, is way better than this garbage.

So tired of all of these middle-aged, old people getting caught on cell cameras acting like idiots.

You think the wait staff knows what cooking oil is shared and isn't? What happens when a chef makes a mistake cooking shellfish in the wrong pan or oil? There is always a small non-zero risk eating out. Why do you take it?

See point 3. We eat out when we travel, and at other times, and if we do we carry the epi-pen. This is my responsibility and one day it will be my DCs. It would be nice if people were perfect, but they aren't so I am prepared for accidental ingestion. I assume the risk when we eat out. What is the point of getting mad at some stranger whose primary concern isn't me and mine.

His son had an EpiPen as well. I don't see the difference.

The difference is that mistakes happen, and you can't just assume that no allergen means no allergen. Shellfish allergies tend to be one of the most severe and they are ones that you don't outgrow, and you can't become desensitized to, and they can crop up, develop at any time for anyone. Meaning one day you can eat shrimp and then the next you can have an anaphylactic reaction.

So you have to learn to live with it, and only an idiot would think the proper reaction to accidental ingestion is to beat someone up. Even my DC who is in elementary school wouldn't wander into a Robeks and order a peanut drink, and then say but wait, hold the peanuts.

Plus anyone with a severe food allergy has two epi-pens because the protocol is first shot, call an ambulance, second shot while waiting for the ambulance. So having to go to administer the shot and then go to the hospital via ambulance isn't exactly an unusual thing, it is protocol. They were just following protocol unless they didn't administer 2 pens, and then well that's on them now, isn't it? If they have the time and money to go to Robek's then they have the time and money to have at least two epi-pens.

If this kids allergy is that severe again you shouldn't be ordering a peanut butter smoothie in a Robek's, if no reaction up until this point they were just playing with a loaded gun.

He ordered without peanut butter. Regardless, you can't control cross contamination in any restaurant. Visiting any food establishment is playing with a loaded gun if you have foo allergies. Even if it's your first, second, or third trip. Claiming that you have "special precautions" that prevent these accidents, like limiting what you order from the menu, is not actually controlling for any of the risk.

Um yes that is the entire point. You can’t control food prepared for someone else, heck recalls happen every day in prepared and packaged food products so the proper course of action is to be prepared and accept that it is fairly probable that sooner or later you will accidentally ingest something and rage at the preparer is stupid.

This guy lost his job because he is a moron. His kid had a bad reaction because he has a bad allergy. No point in blaming some kid in a fast food restaurant. They took a risk and this time it didn’t go thrived way. Assume risk accept consequences.

I am not saying what the guy did is right. But posters claiming that you can safely order in a restaurant using "special techniques" like limiting your choices, carefully reading ingredients, or making inferences on the names of products are delusional.

[Anonymous]

Ianazzo is NOT an Anglo-Saxon name .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Never put your life or your career in the hands of someone making $10 an hour. Facts.

If this money manager hasn't figured this out by now, then of course he should be fired.

#facts#real.facts

Dumbest comment of the thread .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The kid is 17 and should also know better than to order a P-Nut smoothie without double checking and alerting the staff of his severe allergy. Btw, that severe of an allergy should not go to smoothie stores. Cross contamination is always a possibility.

Exactly! It's not like they lacked the means to make their own smoothies . Lazy losers much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ianazzo is NOT an Anglo-Saxon name .

Yes, there are lots of observations about his Italian family suffering the same thing generations ago that he did to this girl.

[Anonymous]

First of all, why is "immigrant" a horrendous insult? I never thought of immigrants as a bad thing, and many men marry even marry bottom of the barrel if she doesn't have a green card. Sophia Vergara fakes an accent because being an immigrant is so advantageous. When a woman (like Vergara) who is an unwed teenage mother has an accent, she's a role model/sexiest woman/etc. If an American-born woman is an unwed teen mom, it's "black women are so irresponsible/wh0r3$". How is that not racist?

How is not racist to say it would be okay if James had an Irish last name, but not an Italian one? He's obviously very remorseful and apologetic, which can't be said about Gianna the teen who's gone through 3 customer service jobs (now 4) in two years.

What percent of American-born teens think "because he's allergic" means he didn't mention an "allergy"? Most people taught English in this country think "allergic" is a derivation of "allergy".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:First of all, why is "immigrant" a horrendous insult? I never thought of immigrants as a bad thing, and many men marry even marry bottom of the barrel if she doesn't have a green card. Sophia Vergara fakes an accent because being an immigrant is so advantageous. When a woman (like Vergara) who is an unwed teenage mother has an accent, she's a role model/sexiest woman/etc. If an American-born woman is an unwed teen mom, it's "black women are so irresponsible/wh0r3$". How is that not racist?

How is not racist to say it would be okay if James had an Irish last name, but not an Italian one? He's obviously very remorseful and apologetic, which can't be said about Gianna the teen who's gone through 3 customer service jobs (now 4) in two years.

What percent of American-born teens think "because he's allergic" means he didn't mention an "allergy"? Most people taught English in this country think "allergic" is a derivation of "allergy".

It's not okay to scream at anyone and call them a stupid immigrant. People are merely pointing out the irony of someone who's obviously a decendant of immigrants to come at these girls for being immigrants as well.

No smoothie shop employee is charged with knowing the degree of anyone allergies. I am allergic to pollen, but can walk outside in springtime without calling 911. The dumb dad ordered the drink without peanut butter but did not ask the staff to sterilize the equipment because his son has such a severe allergy that even the slightest cross contamination could kill him.

Perhaps he's truly remorseful, which would be great. But chances are he is expressing his abject remorse because he is still trying to salvage his reputation and is still facing multiple charges. But if you take his remorse as sincere, then why don't you accept his assertion that what he said and did was wrong? Why are you trying to blame the employees when he is not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How hard is it to make a smoothie?

If your kid has an allergy that is that severe, then why take the risk?

My kid has a shellfish allergy so, we don't go to seafood restaurants as a general rule.

If we are in a restaurant that also serves shellfish, we limit what we order off of the menu.

Is said allergen cooked in the same oil as the other, not allergenic food? Answer: Yes = don't order. Answer: Don't know? = don't order, Answer: no. = Then maybe order...why risk that a hurried waiter or kid waiter, cares enough to ask, observe or enforce. Because my DCs life is my responsibility, who else cares as much as I do, I have the epi-pen ready just in case.

Hope for best prepare for the worst, but my first instinct wouldn't be to beat up the teenager who made the food item.

I would feel shame as a parent and concern for my kid.

This guy clearly felt heavy-duty guilt, he almost killed his kid, because he's the one who found it easier to go to the store and buy a smoothie, rather than make one at home, or have his kid make his own smoothie at home.

It's a smoothie, no one needs a store-bought smoothie.

Learn to manage your anger people, and if you can't squash it then directing it inward, and beating yourself up, is way better than this garbage.

So tired of all of these middle-aged, old people getting caught on cell cameras acting like idiots.

You think the wait staff knows what cooking oil is shared and isn't? What happens when a chef makes a mistake cooking shellfish in the wrong pan or oil? There is always a small non-zero risk eating out. Why do you take it?

See point 3. We eat out when we travel, and at other times, and if we do we carry the epi-pen. This is my responsibility and one day it will be my DCs. It would be nice if people were perfect, but they aren't so I am prepared for accidental ingestion. I assume the risk when we eat out. What is the point of getting mad at some stranger whose primary concern isn't me and mine.

His son had an EpiPen as well. I don't see the difference.

The difference is that mistakes happen, and you can't just assume that no allergen means no allergen. Shellfish allergies tend to be one of the most severe and they are ones that you don't outgrow, and you can't become desensitized to, and they can crop up, develop at any time for anyone. Meaning one day you can eat shrimp and then the next you can have an anaphylactic reaction.

So you have to learn to live with it, and only an idiot would think the proper reaction to accidental ingestion is to beat someone up. Even my DC who is in elementary school wouldn't wander into a Robeks and order a peanut drink, and then say but wait, hold the peanuts.

Plus anyone with a severe food allergy has two epi-pens because the protocol is first shot, call an ambulance, second shot while waiting for the ambulance. So having to go to administer the shot and then go to the hospital via ambulance isn't exactly an unusual thing, it is protocol. They were just following protocol unless they didn't administer 2 pens, and then well that's on them now, isn't it? If they have the time and money to go to Robek's then they have the time and money to have at least two epi-pens.

If this kids allergy is that severe again you shouldn't be ordering a peanut butter smoothie in a Robek's, if no reaction up until this point they were just playing with a loaded gun.

He ordered without peanut butter. Regardless, you can't control cross contamination in any restaurant. Visiting any food establishment is playing with a loaded gun if you have foo allergies. Even if it's your first, second, or third trip. Claiming that you have "special precautions" that prevent these accidents, like limiting what you order from the menu, is not actually controlling for any of the risk.

Um yes that is the entire point. You can’t control food prepared for someone else, heck recalls happen every day in prepared and packaged food products so the proper course of action is to be prepared and accept that it is fairly probable that sooner or later you will accidentally ingest something and rage at the preparer is stupid.

This guy lost his job because he is a moron. His kid had a bad reaction because he has a bad allergy. No point in blaming some kid in a fast food restaurant. They took a risk and this time it didn’t go thrived way. Assume risk accept consequences.

I am not saying what the guy did is right. But posters claiming that you can safely order in a restaurant using "special techniques" like limiting your choices, carefully reading ingredients, or making inferences on the names of products are delusional.

Agreed. The entire thing is ridiculous. When it comes to something that can risk your health, why leave fate up to someone who has absolutely no skin in the game!

Scenario, I make $10 an hour to make a smoothie, your kid gets sick, the worst-case scenario for me personally I lose my job, maybe you sue my employer, oh well, your child is still worst-case... scenario dead.

The man is an entitled meathead no excuses!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kid is 17 and should also know better than to order a P-Nut smoothie without double checking and alerting the staff of his severe allergy. Btw, that severe of an allergy should not go to smoothie stores. Cross contamination is always a possibility.

Exactly! It's not like they lacked the means to make their own smoothies . Lazy losers much?

While at the same time, a mom on another thread is being criticized for wasting time making two kinds of muffins to accommodate the multiple food allergies within her family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kid is 17 and should also know better than to order a P-Nut smoothie without double checking and alerting the staff of his severe allergy. Btw, that severe of an allergy should not go to smoothie stores. Cross contamination is always a possibility.

Exactly! It's not like they lacked the means to make their own smoothies . Lazy losers much?

While at the same time, a mom on another thread is being criticized for wasting time making two kinds of muffins to accommodate the multiple food allergies within her family.

Two things can be true at the same time. Go cry somewhere else .

[Anonymous]

CFP Board Imposes Interim Suspension on James Iannazzo of Southport, Connecticut
https://www.news-journal.com/cfp-board-imposes-interim-suspension-on-james-iannazzo-of-southport-connecticut/article_4ef392a4-5211-5526-bded-49a593fa0545.html

"After reviewing the matter, a Hearing Panel of the Commission determined that CFP Board Counsel demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Iannazzo's conduct significantly impinges upon the reputation of the profession and the CFP® certification marks."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ianazzo is NOT an Anglo-Saxon name .

Um ok? Anglo-saxons immigrated to America too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:CFP Board Imposes Interim Suspension on James Iannazzo of Southport, Connecticut
https://www.news-journal.com/cfp-board-imposes-interim-suspension-on-james-iannazzo-of-southport-connecticut/article_4ef392a4-5211-5526-bded-49a593fa0545.html

"After reviewing the matter, a Hearing Panel of the Commission determined that CFP Board Counsel demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Iannazzo's conduct significantly impinges upon the reputation of the profession and the CFP® certification marks."

*whistles* He really f**ked over his entire career didn’t he?

[Anonymous]

Guilty of being a good parent