LCPS sexual assualt - who is held accountable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If my kid is ever sexually assaulted at school, I’m dialing 911. F the school.

+1

I told my daughter to call 911 if, God forbid, something like this happens at school. Because I have lost any faith I had that something like this would be handled appropriately by the admin.

Often the sheriff's department has a massive multi-year annual contract with the school district for patrols, resource officers, DARE, etc. So don't assume even local police will have your back over their cronies in a school bureaucracy.

To add, who you do think marched in there to arrest (?) the victim's dad the first time at the school and again at the school board meeting? Sheriff's deputies, whose department probably collects millions of dollars from the district.

Did you hear that the first victims Dad, when he was called by the school to come in to be told of his daughters' assault, was not permitted in right away because he didn't have his drivers' license or id on him. WTF

Because in the era of school shootings, no one is allowed into the building without ID to prove their identity. Did he drive to the school?

’

He was with his wife. She drove. They knew damn well who he was

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Based on this case, It’s just as true to say that girls are at risk from rapists in classroom as they are from rapists in school bathrooms. It has nothing to do with whether the rapist pretended to be gender fluid?. He raped anothe student anyway without any pretense about gender fluidity or using a bathroom. The kid is a predator. But the bigots here want to make it all aboutthat.

The actual crime has nothing to do with the perpetrator being gender fluid. A rapist is a rapist. However the cover up by the school and their refusal to treat the issue seriously has everything to do with the district wanting to pass the trans gender bathroom policy. So no you can’t separate the two issues. Also the bathroom policy is extremely liberal with whom is considered trans. Basically any boy who feels like saying he is a girl that day (whether lying or not) can use the bathroom. So a layer of protection is removed from girls because of this policy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The whole transgender issue is distracting and not what people need to realize. School personnel NOT believing a rape victim is the issue!

A girl was sexually assaulted in a bathroom at school. She says right after being attacked she was forced to perform oral sex and sodomized. Not days later, not weeks later, that same day. The school is making it seem like they were so quick to respond and within minutes called the police to this crime scene.

Someone working at the school called the school resource officer (SRO) into the school office so the school district can now say they called the sheriff department within minutes. Don’t be fooled into thinking this means the same thing as calling an impartial 911 dispatcher. The SRO is friendly with the school administration who absolutely doesn’t want this to get out. It is May 28 and there are only a few more days of school left. Is the SRO thinking what’s in the best interest of the student or the administration?

Does the school counselor or school nurse or SRO tell the parents to go to the ER for a rape kit? Does a Detective in sex crimes division get called to the school that same day to start investigating? Take pictures of crime scene? Is the bathroom sealed off? Apparently not because they would have put that in the press release. No, the counselor tells the mother and daughter not to talk to each other. The father isn’t allowed into school because he has no ID and then gets escorted out by police. The principal puts out a press release about a disturbance. Then the press release further maligned the victim by saying she knew the perpetrator so that’s her fault for delaying the case.

Imagine you are working in an office at a courthouse or government building and are raped in a bathroom at work by someone you might have been in a training with. Your boss calls the sheriff who works there who is his buddy. Your spouse comes and they tell you not to talk to each other so then your husband is enraged and gets escorted out when he protests. They don’t tell you to go to the ER and say the friendly courthouse sheriff can just take the report.

What did the SRO and admin tell investigators Since investigating this crime is was NOT a priority because it took until July to make any sort of progress on this case.

The take away from this is if your kid is attacked at school get your kid out of the school building ASAP and call 911 from your car as you drive to the ER so it is documented. Don’t trust that the admin and SRO are going to be a on your side.

100% this

[Anonymous]

The focus of this whole issue should be how LCPS needs to chance its policies and practices to prevent assaults from happening in its school. Unfortunately the focus has become what narrow-minded RWNJs LouDoun residents are because they’re more interested in using this for their anti-trans agenda than in ensuring student safety.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The focus of this whole issue should be how LCPS needs to chance its policies and practices to prevent assaults from happening in its school. Unfortunately the focus has become what narrow-minded RWNJs LouDoun residents are because they’re more interested in using this for their anti-trans agenda than in ensuring student safety.

Bingo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The focus of this whole issue should be how LCPS needs to chance its policies and practices to prevent assaults from happening in its school. Unfortunately the focus has become what narrow-minded RWNJs LouDoun residents are because they’re more interested in using this for their anti-trans agenda than in ensuring student safety.

Exactly. They detract from the actual issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The focus of this whole issue should be how LCPS needs to chance its policies and practices to prevent assaults from happening in its school. Unfortunately the focus has become what narrow-minded RWNJs LouDoun residents are because they’re more interested in using this for their anti-trans agenda than in ensuring student safety.

Exactly. They detract from the actual issue.

Two wrongs don’t make a right. The LWNJs tried to sweep this under the rug out of fear it would detract from their agenda. Politics in this area are disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The focus of this whole issue should be how LCPS needs to chance its policies and practices to prevent assaults from happening in its school. Unfortunately the focus has become what narrow-minded RWNJs LouDoun residents are because they’re more interested in using this for their anti-trans agenda than in ensuring student safety.

Exactly. They detract from the actual issue.

Two wrongs don’t make a right. The LWNJs tried to sweep this under the rug out of fear it would detract from their agenda. Politics in this area are disgusting.

It should be handled like any other crime.

And RWNJs shouldn’t exploit it politically.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The focus of this whole issue should be how LCPS needs to chance its policies and practices to prevent assaults from happening in its school. Unfortunately the focus has become what narrow-minded RWNJs LouDoun residents are because they’re more interested in using this for their anti-trans agenda than in ensuring student safety.

Exactly. They detract from the actual issue.

Two wrongs don’t make a right. The LWNJs tried to sweep this under the rug out of fear it would detract from their agenda. Politics in this area are disgusting.

And there you go, proving the point.

[Anonymous]

It should be handled like any other crime.

And RWNJs shouldn’t exploit it politically.

The cover up is the political exploitation. Not the outrage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

It should be handled like any other crime.

And RWNJs shouldn’t exploit it politically.

The cover up is the political exploitation. Not the outrage.

Calling it a “cover up” is politically motivated and not based on facts.

Jeff’s timeline & summary of facts:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1007838.page

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you know what wasn't covered by ABC, CBS, and NBC the other night? The Loudoun County School Board covered up the reported sexual assault of a 9th grade girl to pass a transgender bathroom policy:

Louder once more for the folks in the back. LCPS didn’t have a choice. It is Virginia state law that they must do this. Even if the truth had come out fully that night, they still didn’t have a choice. JFC how many times do we have to explain this? Take it up with your state legislators.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you know what wasn't covered by ABC, CBS, and NBC the other night? The Loudoun County School Board covered up the reported sexual assault of a 9th grade girl to pass a transgender bathroom policy:

Louder once more for the folks in the back. LCPS didn’t have a choice. It is Virginia state law that they must do this. Even if the truth had come out fully that night, they still didn’t have a choice. JFC how many times do we have to explain this? Take it up with your state legislators.

+1. They’re as stupid as they are malicious.

[Anonymous]

The boy was described as gender fluid. This is different than gender non conforming. A boy can wear dresses and makeup and still identify as a boy. However with gender fluid their gender identity can shift between a boy and a girl. So if a boy labels himself as gender fluid then he can go into both the girls and boys bathroom depending on how he feels that particular day? What about kids that are non-binary?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you know what wasn't covered by ABC, CBS, and NBC the other night? The Loudoun County School Board covered up the reported sexual assault of a 9th grade girl to pass a transgender bathroom policy:

Louder once more for the folks in the back. LCPS didn’t have a choice. It is Virginia state law that they must do this. Even if the truth had come out fully that night, they still didn’t have a choice. JFC how many times do we have to explain this? Take it up with your state legislators.

So, why did they have to discuss it at all? Why did they have to pass a policy if it is law.
They could have just stated that it is law and they don't have to take any action.