This exactly. Seems like there are plenty of problems in the world to get upset about. Dog Mom doesn't seem like one of them. |
So your argument here is that the inherent value of a dogs life is the same as that of a human? Wow wow wow. |
NP: eh, depends on the human, depends on the dog. |
No, that's the exact opposite of what I'm saying. I'm saying there is no inherent value in a dog or a human, the only value is that which we personally assign to it. For me personally, the value of my dog is the same or greater as that of any human except for my wife. For you it is apparently different, and we are both right because value is meaningless outside of what we perceive it as. |
If you’ve never been a parent to an actual child you will never know the depth of love and joy that they give you. I didn’t, before I had my own. |
Please seek help. |
No.... |
|
My sister will never have human children, so she calls herself a dog mom.
Why does anyone care? |
Do you know what the trolley problem is? If not, imagine a trolley speeding towards you. You are standing at the switch that can divert the trolley onto one of two tracks. On one track, there is your child, on the other track, is a random child that you have never met before. They are both tied to the tracks and there is no way to reach them in time. You have to choose which way to flip the switch, will the trolley kill your child, or will it kill the other child you don't know. Now obviously you flip the switch so it spares your child, right? But why? The random child is a human just like your child. It has parents that love them every bit as much as you love your own child. If you truly believe all humans have inherent and equal worth, there should be no difference which child you save. But of course you don't believe they have equal worth because you saved your child over the random one. But wait, if it was that random child's parents at the switch, they would have saved their child! So clearly that worth can neither be inherent nor equal, otherwise the same decision would be made regardless of which parent was at the switch. The only possible conclusion is that the value of those lives are subjective, neither inherent nor equal, and if you would choose your own child, you agree with me whether you want to admit it or not. |
Yes...a child...You are so close to understanding. So close. |
I mean, this is basically true. Dogs, though domesticated, are better equipped to fend for themselves in the wild, if they had to, than children. Because of humans acting like their parents, they're dependent. There is a band of stray cats near me that seem to have a routine and a regular route they follow and appear to be doing ok fending for themselves. |
My children have a sister who is a cat They tell me that the cat is my favourite child.
|
|
Somewhere out there, on a farm not so distantly far from you, cats and dogs are still out there living their lives outside and behaving like animals. |
Is the PP suggesting they would save their dog over a child they didn’t know?? That’s actually crazy. I don’t care if people call themselves “dog moms”, but man after this thread I definitely think there’s something wrong with dog moms. Wow. |