Arlington GA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would 08 Arlington players leave? They got Mo for a coach who is supposed to be amazing. Switch to McLean for who? Haytham? Jaon? This is a developmental year. That would be a huge mistake. Stay with Mo for 2 years and you will be light years ahead of anyone at McLean and can easily switch over later. In fact if I were a McLean 08 I would switch to Arlington if it's not too late. Play for Mo on a reasonable sized team or play on a 30 person team?

hmmm. play for him before you believe the hype.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would 08 Arlington players leave? They got Mo for a coach who is supposed to be amazing. Switch to McLean for who? Haytham? Jaon? This is a developmental year. That would be a huge mistake. Stay with Mo for 2 years and you will be light years ahead of anyone at McLean and can easily switch over later. In fact if I were a McLean 08 I would switch to Arlington if it's not too late. Play for Mo on a reasonable sized team or play on a 30 person team?

My pout completely. Not necessarily regarding Arlington but the point stands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see topics on other clubs I figured why not Arlington? What are they saying? Is the 2008 Arlington team switching to Mclean ECNL? Are the 2007 Girls switching clubs?

They are saying they don't care much for the girls as they do for the boys side...

[Anonymous]

What 30-person team? U18/19 has 24+ but that is all girls who are among the best and the region and are in their jr/sr year with other commitment, hence, they need a large roster. By the way, from what I understand, all the girls on that team had DI offers including some to top programs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What 30-person team? U18/19 has 24+ but that is all girls who are among the best and the region and are in their jr/sr year with other commitment, hence, they need a large roster. By the way, from what I understand, all the girls on that team had DI offers including some to top programs.

That team is done. HUUUUGE difference between a team formed 6 years ago when there was only 2 ECNL options and a 08 team now.

There is zero to correlate two age groups at the bookend of their development.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What 30-person team? U18/19 has 24+ but that is all girls who are among the best and the region and are in their jr/sr year with other commitment, hence, they need a large roster. By the way, from what I understand, all the girls on that team had DI offers including some to top programs.

Anyone who joins McLean at 08 based on how the U18/19s performed might as well consider BRYC because Mia Hamm played there almost half a century ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would 08 Arlington players leave? They got Mo for a coach who is supposed to be amazing. Switch to McLean for who? Haytham? Jaon? This is a developmental year. That would be a huge mistake. Stay with Mo for 2 years and you will be light years ahead of anyone at McLean and can easily switch over later. In fact if I were a McLean 08 I would switch to Arlington if it's not too late. Play for Mo on a reasonable sized team or play on a 30 person team?

hmmm. play for him before you believe the hype.

Wasn’t he coach of the year twice? What is wrong with him? Please tell me

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would 08 Arlington players leave? They got Mo for a coach who is supposed to be amazing. Switch to McLean for who? Haytham? Jaon? This is a developmental year. That would be a huge mistake. Stay with Mo for 2 years and you will be light years ahead of anyone at McLean and can easily switch over later. In fact if I were a McLean 08 I would switch to Arlington if it's not too late. Play for Mo on a reasonable sized team or play on a 30 person team?

I thought Mo was not the coach? Didn’t they release the coaches on the GA call?

[Anonymous]

Mo is the next stop on the conveyor belt of a flawed end product. Arlington looks for the easy way out by keeping their fingers crossed that they have enough "elite" players (who are BFS - bugger faster stronger) than most peers - simply based on numbers. When you have a squad like that anyone can coach and it makes the coach look good with Ws but little development. Cracks show as they get older.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mo is the next stop on the conveyor belt of a flawed end product. Arlington looks for the easy way out by keeping their fingers crossed that they have enough "elite" players (who are BFS - bugger faster stronger) than most peers - simply based on numbers. When you have a squad like that anyone can coach and it makes the coach look good with Ws but little development. Cracks show as they get older.

So I know some 08 players at Arlington are unhappy with the lack of skill training and no expectation of technical play. That type of system works for some players but not for others. I have seen players regress to the point where they stop moving to space after a pass because they know the ball will rarely be passed back. How many times will you try a give and go if the other player never passes back? In the spring an hour and 1/2 practice was 55 minutes of conditioning work and four touches on the ball...at u12?

Before the pandemic I know two parents who contacted Mclean to attend a practice but got no call back. I guess MU calls you back, maybe it’s that simple?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mo is the next stop on the conveyor belt of a flawed end product. Arlington looks for the easy way out by keeping their fingers crossed that they have enough "elite" players (who are BFS - bugger faster stronger) than most peers - simply based on numbers. When you have a squad like that anyone can coach and it makes the coach look good with Ws but little development. Cracks show as they get older.

So I know some 08 players at Arlington are unhappy with the lack of skill training and no expectation of technical play. That type of system works for some players but not for others. I have seen players regress to the point where they stop moving to space after a pass because they know the ball will rarely be passed back. How many times will you try a give and go if the other player never passes back? In the spring an hour and 1/2 practice was 55 minutes of conditioning work and four touches on the ball...at u12?

Before the pandemic I know two parents who contacted Mclean to attend a practice but got no call back. I guess MU calls you back, maybe it’s that simple?

Arlington 08 played McLean 08 this past season and looked much better technically than McLean. I would say Arlington possessed the ball 75% of the time. So I'm not sure this argument carries over. At least not in the 08 age group. At the 08 age group I've been able to watch almost all of the teams play within the past year. Here is my prediction of teams and how they will perform.
1. VDA
2. Loudoun
3. Arlington
4. BRYC
5. McLean
6. FCV

[Anonymous]

Can someone tell me what is wrong with Mo? We decided to stay because of his reputation.

[Anonymous]

Wrong the list is

1)VDA
2)FCV
3)Mclean
4)Loudoun

any other club is not worth mentioning

[Anonymous]

Agree that VDA should be #1. The rest? Flip a coin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would 08 Arlington players leave? They got Mo for a coach who is supposed to be amazing. Switch to McLean for who? Haytham? Jaon? This is a developmental year. That would be a huge mistake. Stay with Mo for 2 years and you will be light years ahead of anyone at McLean and can easily switch over later. In fact if I were a McLean 08 I would switch to Arlington if it's not too late. Play for Mo on a reasonable sized team or play on a 30 person team?

hmmm. play for him before you believe the hype.

Wasn’t he coach of the year twice? What is wrong with him? Please tell me

DD had Mo for 2 years. He is tough, and not warm and fuzzy at all. But she liked him and learned a lot from him. He made her work harder than she had ever worked. There were definitely some tears after many practices.