Who cares. We don't need it. |
Really? I'm Arlington and I have huge concerns over GA beyond next year. I personally hope that Arlington can figure out a way to get ECNL for the girls because I think GA will gradually become weaker each year. I hope I'm wrong. |
That's one view, but the reality is that no one knows. In this area, the GA is in general stronger and the GA mid atlantic is a good place to be from a competition and geographical range standpoint. Arlington doesn't need ECNL. |
Blah, Blah, Blah! It sounds like sour grapes. Why did Arlington apply to ECNL if GA Mid Atlantic division is stronger? Arlington's actions speak louder than your words. |
Ahh, Loudoun ECNL parent, probably 2007. Makes sense. Thanks. |
Everyone applied to ECNL to cover their bases. GA seemed to do a pretty good job putting a league together under very trying circumstances. Imagine ECNL letting all those clubs walk. Which is harder, adding clubs into an established league or starting a brand new league? Just insane the short sightedness of ECNL. They had a golden opportunity to end it once and for all. |
ECNL took the best DA clubs. Arlington was not one of them. Nor was MU. |
But BRYC and Loudoun are. LOL. OK, “The best” |
agreed--PP is a clown. He'll learn when his 13 year old WNT member grows up
|
|
Correction - they did not lose "all of the FCV travel teams" just the boys travel program is gone. The few that did leave were not top players. |
Right. |
BRYC and Loudoun were not in DA, when it fell apart. When DA fell apart, ECNL had the pick of the litter. Arlington and MU were not among the top DA programs. ECNL took Arlington boys, who had a stronger program. |
ECNL picked two bad clubs who are performing poorly. ECNL is not terribly selective sorry to break that to you. |
This is accurate. There’s no differentiation by club or player quality locally between the two leagues. There are better and worse teams, across both. Either are a step up from the alternatives, though. |