You are correct my math may be off by a couple years. I did a quick estimate of graduating HS at 17, 4 years undergrad and 2 years grad school making me 23 when I entered the workforce full time but yes, it may be closer to 11 or 12. |
|
^^ also I roughly estimated my age, I’ll be 36 soon (New Years babies!). Should have known DCUM will catch that!
Honestly, it was just a rough outline answering the question. Of course those are not exact figures, rounded figures, for my assets either |
I WAH and make $170k. It would be considerably less because my husband makes $400k. But, I have all of the health benefits, etc. We are 21 years in so 1 house is paid off and the other house almost there. That is protection too since there wouldn't be a mortgage and kids (pre-teen, teen) already have maxed out 529s. My parents ALWAYS said to always have your own form of income. Keep one foot in the door, even if it is part-time. You always need a means to support yourself---and have your own retirement! |
That will be split upon divorce. Always having income helps you stay afloat at the start of the divorce so that is definitely smart. |
So you became a SAHM in like, recent months? |
|
I like to point out in this threads about stability and finances that you really don’t know if your husbands health or your health will support a career.
I work in healthcare, so of course I see all the men and women in their 40’s and on with debilitating diseases that make them unable to work (Multiple sclerosis, ALS, Parkinson’s, early onset dementia, stroke, car accidents). So to me, having 2 working adults is great, but it’s not this magical guarantee. It could be said that it’s just as likely that a working mom will have to support her family on the lesser income, or go full time, as a SAHM taking a few years off to be home with their babies. If they are alive, and have a chronic progressive disease, there is no life insurance and you are on the hook for medical bills as well. So for all those crowing over their financial security over a mom that steps out of the workforce for years while the children are young, it’s possible that you too could become the sole breadwinner for your family and lose that big husband income as well. Life happens, and we make the best choices we can. I’m certainly not going to work through my children’s infant years on the chance we could get divorced just as many of you are not working full time 80 hours per week saving every penny on the chance your husband is in a car accident and paralyzed. It just is not that simple |
No, 2 years ago. I have one on the way and will want a 3rd quickly as well, hence my example of having a 4, 2 and newborn to keep me plenty busy at home and why when we planned for me to stay home it made the most sense. |
How do you kids have trust funds if your husband only earns $350k a year? Where do you live where you have such a cheap house? |
This is like one of those "how I paid off my debt in three years" articles that magazines like to run. The answer is ALWAYS generational wealth. |
|
PP here. Generational wealth plus working out asses off and saving before we had children. |
WHy did he continue to work? Seriously. Why couldn't he work for a nonprofit or accidentally get fired or something. Do people actually get forced to work post-divorce? In this guy's case, they probably had assets at the time of divorce. Move to Kansas and downsize life. |
|
I plan to die young.
If Mother Nature doesn’t cooperate, I’ll help her along. |
|
I have a small nest egg plus an inheritance coming my way. |
Because he signed a legal document agreeing to make the payments. Most likely his wife got the agreement she did because he was desperate to be rid of her. So many men will sign whatever the ex wants just to be rid of them. |